Literature DB >> 17208349

Public policy, private landholders: perspectives on policy mechanisms for sustainable land management.

Chris Cocklin1, Naomi Mautner, Jacqui Dibden.   

Abstract

A variety of tools can be employed in support of environmental policy objectives, but achieving preferred outcomes also requires the cooperation of private landholders and others with vested interests in the land. The Land Stewardship project in the state of Victoria, Australia, is an initiative devoted to exploring the ways in which private landholders could be encouraged towards more sustainable land management. Following the view that the success of policy initiatives is contingent on effective stakeholder engagement, a component of the Land Stewardship project involved a dialogue with landholders about policy tools (e.g., regulation, economic instruments) that might be deployed to encourage improved land management practices. This paper provides an account of the views and attitudes of landholders, as revealed in a series of three workshops, which consisted of discussions about the factors influencing agriculture, participants' interpretations of sustainability, and policy methods. The focus of the paper is on what landholders believe to be the strengths and limitations of standard policy tools, and the essential requirements for these tools to deliver the best land management outcomes. One of the main findings of the project was a 'preference hierarchy' in respect of policy methods, according to which the strongest support was expressed for voluntary and education-based tools, followed by market-based instruments, with command-and-control regulation identified as a measure of 'last resort'. In the paper we reflect also on how the views and outlook of landholders should be positioned relative to other inputs in the design of policy interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17208349     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  7 in total

1.  Farmer participation in U.S. Farm Bill conservation programs.

Authors:  Adam P Reimer; Linda S Prokopy
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Oasis land-use change and its effects on the eco-environment in Yanqi Basin, Xinjiang, China.

Authors:  Zulpiya Mamat; Hamid Yimit; Anwar Eziz; Ajigul Ablimit
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Towards a duty of care for biodiversity.

Authors:  G Earl; A Curtis; C Allan
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Psychosocial drivers of land management behaviour: How threats, norms, and context influence deforestation intentions.

Authors:  B Alexander Simmons; Kerrie A Wilson; Angela J Dean
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 6.943

5.  Cross-scale and social-ecological changes constitute main threats to private land conservation in South Africa.

Authors:  Hayley S Clements; Reinette Biggs; Graeme S Cumming
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 6.789

6.  Trust Versus Content in Multi-functional Land Management: Assessing Soil Function Messaging in Agricultural Networks.

Authors:  Lilian O'Sullivan; Cees Leeuwis; Linde de Vries; David P Wall; Talke Heidkroß; Kirsten Madena; Rogier P O Schulte
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.644

7.  Managing the risk of Hendra virus spillover in Australia using ecological approaches: A report on three community juries.

Authors:  Chris Degeling; Gwendolyn L Gilbert; Edward Annand; Melanie Taylor; Michael G Walsh; Michael P Ward; Andrew Wilson; Jane Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.