Literature DB >> 24113845

Mammographic artifacts on full-field digital mammography.

Jae Jeong Choi1, Sung Hun Kim, Bong Joo Kang, Byung Gil Choi, ByungJoo Song, Haijo Jung.   

Abstract

This study investigates the incidence of full-field digital mammographic (FFDM) artifacts with three systems at two institutions and compares the artifacts between two detector types and two grid types. A total of 4,440 direct and 4,142 indirect FFDM images were reviewed by two radiologists, and artifacts were classified as patient related, hardware related, and software processing. The overall incidence of FFDM artifacts was 3.4% (292/8,582). Patient related artifacts (motion artifacts and skin line artifacts) were the most commonly detected types (1.7%). Underexposure among hardware related artifacts and high-density artifacts among software processing artifacts also were common (0.7 and 0.5%, respectively). These artifacts, specific to digital mammography, were more common with the direct detector type and the crossed air grid type than with the indirect type and linear grid type (p < 0.05). The most common mammographic artifacts on FFDM were patient related, which might be controlled by the instruction of a patient and technologist. Underexposure and high-density artifacts were more common with direct detector and crossed air type of grid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24113845      PMCID: PMC3948935          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-013-9641-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  6 in total

Review 1.  Challenges in mammography: part 1, artifacts in digital mammography.

Authors:  William R Geiser; Tamara Miner Haygood; Lumarie Santiago; Tanya Stephens; Debra Thames; Gary J Whitman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Digital mammographic artifacts on full-field systems: what are they and how do I fix them?

Authors:  Rama S Ayyala; Maryann Chorlton; Richard H Behrman; Phyllis J Kornguth; Priscilla J Slanetz
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Development and Monte Carlo analysis of antiscatter grids for mammography.

Authors:  John M Boone; Olga V Makarova; Vladislav N Zyryanov; Cha-Mei Tang; Derrick C Mancini; Nikolaie Moldovan; Ralu Divan
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2002-12

4.  Lag and ghosting in a clinical flat-panel selenium digital mammography system.

Authors:  Aili K Bloomquist; Martin J Yaffe; Gordon E Mawdsley; David M Hunter; Daniel J Beideck
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Artifacts in digital mammography.

Authors:  C Van Ongeval; J Jacobs; H Bosmans
Journal:  JBR-BTR       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec

6.  Screen film vs full-field digital mammography: image quality, detectability and characterization of lesions.

Authors:  S Obenauer; S Luftner-Nagel; D von Heyden; U Munzel; F Baum; E Grabbe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Extra patient movement during mammographic imaging: an experimental study.

Authors:  W K Ma; D Brettle; D Howard; J Kelly; S Millington; P Hogg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  The impact of simulated motion blur on lesion detection performance in full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Ahmed K Abdullah; Judith Kelly; John D Thompson; Claire E Mercer; Rob Aspin; Peter Hogg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Differences between human and machine perception in medical diagnosis.

Authors:  Taro Makino; Stanisław Jastrzębski; Witold Oleszkiewicz; Celin Chacko; Robin Ehrenpreis; Naziya Samreen; Chloe Chhor; Eric Kim; Jiyon Lee; Kristine Pysarenko; Beatriu Reig; Hildegard Toth; Divya Awal; Linda Du; Alice Kim; James Park; Daniel K Sodickson; Laura Heacock; Linda Moy; Kyunghyun Cho; Krzysztof J Geras
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  The augmented radiologist: artificial intelligence in the practice of radiology.

Authors:  Erich Sorantin; Michael G Grasser; Ariane Hemmelmayr; Sebastian Tschauner; Franko Hrzic; Veronika Weiss; Jana Lacekova; Andreas Holzinger
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-10-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.