Literature DB >> 19001654

Digital mammographic artifacts on full-field systems: what are they and how do I fix them?

Rama S Ayyala1, Maryann Chorlton, Richard H Behrman, Phyllis J Kornguth, Priscilla J Slanetz.   

Abstract

The recent introduction of digital mammography represents a significant technologic advance in breast imaging. However, many radiologists and technologists are unfamiliar with artifacts that are commonly seen with this modality, and recognizing these artifacts is critical for optimizing image quality. Commonly encountered artifacts include patient-related artifacts (motion artifact, antiperspirant artifact, thin breast artifact), hardware-related artifacts (field inhomogeneity, detector-associated artifacts, collimator misalignment, underexposure, grid lines, grid misplacement, vibration artifact), and software processing artifacts ("breast-within-a-breast" artifact, vertical processing bars, loss of edge, high-density artifacts). Although some of these artifacts are similar to those seen with screen-film mammography, many are unique to digital mammography--specifically, those due to software processing errors or digital detector deficiencies. In addition, digital mammographic artifacts depend on detector technology (direct vs indirect) and therefore can be vendor specific. It is important that the technologist, radiologist, and physicist become familiar with the spectrum of digital mammographic artifacts and pay careful attention to digital quality control procedures to ensure optimal image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19001654     DOI: 10.1148/rg.287085053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  4 in total

1.  Mammographic artifacts on full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Jae Jeong Choi; Sung Hun Kim; Bong Joo Kang; Byung Gil Choi; ByungJoo Song; Haijo Jung
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Breast Positioning during Mammography: Mistakes to be Avoided.

Authors:  Manju Bala Popli; Rahul Teotia; Meenakshi Narang; Hare Krishna
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2014-07-30

3.  X-ray interferometry without analyzer for breast CT application: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jingzhu Xu; Kyungmin Ham; Joyoni Dey
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-03-26

4.  Shielding a high-sensitivity digital detector from electromagnetic interference.

Authors:  David E Hintenlang; Xia Jiang; Kevin J Little
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.