Literature DB >> 23366430

The depth, waveform and pulse rate for electrical microstimulation of the auditory cortex.

Andrew S Koivuniemi1, Kevin J Otto.   

Abstract

Intracortical microstimulation of primary sensory regions of the brain offers a compelling platform for the development of sensory prostheses. However, fundamental questions remain regarding the optimal stimulation parameters. The purpose of this paper is to summarize a series of experiments which were designed to answer the following three questions. 1) What is the best electrode implantation depth? 2) What is the optimal stimulation waveform? 3) What is the maximal useful stimulus pulse rate? The present results suggest the following answers: 1) cortical layers V&IV, 2) biphasic, charge balanced, symmetric, cathode leading pulses with of duration of ∼ 100 microseconds per phase, and 3) 80 pulses-per-second.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23366430     DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  12 in total

1.  Behavioral assessment of sensitivity to intracortical microstimulation of primate somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Sungshin Kim; Thierri Callier; Gregg A Tabot; Robert A Gaunt; Francesco V Tenore; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Comparing temporal aspects of visual, tactile, and microstimulation feedback for motor control.

Authors:  Jason M Godlove; Erin O Whaite; Aaron P Batista
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Constant RMS versus constant peak modulation for the perceptual equivalence of sinusoidal amplitude modulated signals.

Authors:  Oliver B Regele; Andrew S Koivuniemi; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2013

4.  A computational model that predicts behavioral sensitivity to intracortical microstimulation.

Authors:  Sungshin Kim; Thierri Callier; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 5.  Toward a Proprioceptive Neural Interface that Mimics Natural Cortical Activity.

Authors:  Tucker Tomlinson; Lee E Miller
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 6.  The science and engineering behind sensitized brain-controlled bionic hands.

Authors:  Chethan Pandarinath; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  Workshops of the Fifth International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting: Defining the Future.

Authors:  Jane E Huggins; Christoph Guger; Brendan Allison; Charles W Anderson; Aaron Batista; Anne-Marie A-M Brouwer; Clemens Brunner; Ricardo Chavarriaga; Melanie Fried-Oken; Aysegul Gunduz; Disha Gupta; Andrea Kübler; Robert Leeb; Fabien Lotte; Lee E Miller; Gernot Müller-Putz; Tomasz Rutkowski; Michael Tangermann; David Edward Thompson
Journal:  Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon)       Date:  2014-01

8.  The effects of chronic intracortical microstimulation on neural tissue and fine motor behavior.

Authors:  Alexander T Rajan; Jessica L Boback; John F Dammann; Francesco V Tenore; Brock A Wester; Kevin J Otto; Robert A Gaunt; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of cortical microstimulation parameters.

Authors:  Bilal A Bari; Douglas R Ollerenshaw; Daniel C Millard; Qi Wang; Garrett B Stanley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Duration of Motor Responses Evoked with Intracortical Microstimulation in Rats Is Primarily Modulated by Stimulus Amplitude and Train Duration.

Authors:  Meghan Watson; Mohamad Sawan; Numa Dancause
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.