UNLABELLED: IMPORTANCE It is not known whether hospital and surgeon volumes have an association with readmission among patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient-, surgeon-, and hospital-level factors associated with readmission. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data with cases diagnosed from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2005, and followed up until December 2007. Population-based cancer registry data were linked to Medicare data for the corresponding patients. A total of 1488 unique individuals who underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy were identified. INTERVENTIONS: Undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy at hospitals classified by volume of pancreatoduodenectomy procedures performed at the facility were either very-low, low, medium, or high volume. Undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy by surgeons classified by volume of pancreatoduodenectomy procedures performed by the surgeon were either very-low, low, medium, or high volume. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: In-hospital morbidity, mortality, and 30-day readmission were examined. RESULTS: The median age was 74 years, and 1436 patients (96.5%) had a least 1 medical comorbidity. Patients were treated by 575 distinct surgeons at 298 distinct hospitals. Length of stay was longest (median, 17 days) and 90-day mortality highest (17.2%) at very-low-volume hospitals (P < .001). Among all pancreatoduodenectomy patients, 292 (21.3%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. There was no effect of surgeon volume and a modest effect of hospital volume (odds ratio for highest- vs lowest-volume quartiles, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.22-2.80; P = .02). The presence of significant preoperative medical comorbidities was associated with an increased risk for hospital readmission after pancreatoduodenectomy. A comorbidity score greater than 13 had a pronounced effect on the chance of readmission following pancreatoduodenectomy (odds ratio, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.56-2.71; P < .001). The source of variation in readmission was primarily attributable to patient-related factors (95.4%), while hospital factors accounted for 4.3% of the variability and physician factors for only 0.3%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Nearly 1 in 5 patients are readmitted following pancreatoduodenectomy. While variation in readmission is, in part, attributable to differences among hospitals, the largest share of variation was found at the patient level.
UNLABELLED: IMPORTANCE It is not known whether hospital and surgeon volumes have an association with readmission among patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient-, surgeon-, and hospital-level factors associated with readmission. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data with cases diagnosed from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2005, and followed up until December 2007. Population-based cancer registry data were linked to Medicare data for the corresponding patients. A total of 1488 unique individuals who underwent a pancreatoduodenectomy were identified. INTERVENTIONS: Undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy at hospitals classified by volume of pancreatoduodenectomy procedures performed at the facility were either very-low, low, medium, or high volume. Undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy by surgeons classified by volume of pancreatoduodenectomy procedures performed by the surgeon were either very-low, low, medium, or high volume. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: In-hospital morbidity, mortality, and 30-day readmission were examined. RESULTS: The median age was 74 years, and 1436 patients (96.5%) had a least 1 medical comorbidity. Patients were treated by 575 distinct surgeons at 298 distinct hospitals. Length of stay was longest (median, 17 days) and 90-day mortality highest (17.2%) at very-low-volume hospitals (P < .001). Among all pancreatoduodenectomy patients, 292 (21.3%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. There was no effect of surgeon volume and a modest effect of hospital volume (odds ratio for highest- vs lowest-volume quartiles, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.22-2.80; P = .02). The presence of significant preoperative medical comorbidities was associated with an increased risk for hospital readmission after pancreatoduodenectomy. A comorbidity score greater than 13 had a pronounced effect on the chance of readmission following pancreatoduodenectomy (odds ratio, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.56-2.71; P < .001). The source of variation in readmission was primarily attributable to patient-related factors (95.4%), while hospital factors accounted for 4.3% of the variability and physician factors for only 0.3%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Nearly 1 in 5 patients are readmitted following pancreatoduodenectomy. While variation in readmission is, in part, attributable to differences among hospitals, the largest share of variation was found at the patient level.
Authors: Eric B Schneider; Omar Hyder; Benjamin S Brooke; Jonathan Efron; John L Cameron; Barish H Edil; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; Christopher L Wolfgang; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2012-01-29 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Timothy J Kennedy; Maria A Cassera; Ronald Wolf; Lee L Swanstrom; Paul D Hansen Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2010-07-30 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Robert C G Martin; Russell Brown; Lisa Puffer; Stacey Block; Glenda Callender; Amy Quillo; Charles R Scoggins; Kelly M McMasters Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Hari Nathan; Andrew D Shore; Robert A Anders; Elizabeth C Wick; Susan L Gearhart; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2010-12-21 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Eric B Schneider; Omar Hyder; Christopher L Wolfgang; Kenzo Hirose; Michael A Choti; Martin A Makary; Joseph M Herman; John L Cameron; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Syed A Ahmad; Michael J Edwards; Jeffrey M Sutton; Sanjeet S Grewal; Dennis J Hanseman; Shishir K Maithel; Sameer H Patel; David J Bentram; Sharon M Weber; Clifford S Cho; Emily R Winslow; Charles R Scoggins; Robert C Martin; Hong Jin Kim; Justin J Baker; Nipun B Merchant; Alexander A Parikh; David A Kooby Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Francisco Igor B Macedo; Prakash Jayanthi; Mia Mowzoon; Danny Yakoub; Vikas Dudeja; Nipun Merchant Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-07-25 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Marion van der Kolk; Mark van den Boogaard; Femke Becking-Verhaar; Hettie Custers; Hans van der Hoeven; Peter Pickkers; Kees van Laarhoven Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Alex W Lois; Matthew J Frelich; Natasha A Sahr; Samuel F Hohmann; Tao Wang; Jon C Gould Journal: Surgery Date: 2015-05-29 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Justin A Barnes; Melissa L Ellis; Sharon Hwang; Joan Emarine; Patti Merwin; Gregory D Salinas; Benjamin L Musher Journal: J Gastrointest Cancer Date: 2019-03
Authors: Jason T Wiseman; Amanda M Guzman; Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Travis L Engelbert; R Scott Saunders; K Craig Kent Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2014-05-22 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Dimitrios Xourafas; Akweley Ablorh; Thomas E Clancy; Richard S Swanson; Stanley W Ashley Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Javier Valero-Elizondo; Yuhree Kim; Jason D Prescott; Georgios A Margonis; Thuy B Tran; Lauren M Postlewait; Shishir K Maithel; Tracy S Wang; Jason A Glenn; Ioannis Hatzaras; Rivfka Shenoy; John E Phay; Kara Keplinger; Ryan C Fields; Linda X Jin; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Jason K Sicklick; Shady Gad; Adam C Yopp; John C Mansour; Quan-Yang Duh; Natalie Seiser; Carmen C Solorzano; Colleen M Kiernan; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos; Edward A Levine; George A Poultsides; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Lennart B van Rijssen; Poorvi Narwade; Nadine C M van Huijgevoort; Dorine S J Tseng; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Isaac Q Molenaar; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Casper H J van Eijck; Olivier R C Busch; Marc G H Besselink Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 3.647