Literature DB >> 21886159

Real-time quantum feedback prepares and stabilizes photon number states.

Clément Sayrin1, Igor Dotsenko, Xingxing Zhou, Bruno Peaudecerf, Théo Rybarczyk, Sébastien Gleyzes, Pierre Rouchon, Mazyar Mirrahimi, Hadis Amini, Michel Brune, Jean-Michel Raimond, Serge Haroche.   

Abstract

Feedback loops are central to most classical control procedures. A controller compares the signal measured by a sensor (system output) with the target value or set-point. It then adjusts an actuator (system input) to stabilize the signal around the target value. Generalizing this scheme to stabilize a micro-system's quantum state relies on quantum feedback, which must overcome a fundamental difficulty: the sensor measurements cause a random back-action on the system. An optimal compromise uses weak measurements, providing partial information with minimal perturbation. The controller should include the effect of this perturbation in the computation of the actuator's operation, which brings the incrementally perturbed state closer to the target. Although some aspects of this scenario have been experimentally demonstrated for the control of quantum or classical micro-system variables, continuous feedback loop operations that permanently stabilize quantum systems around a target state have not yet been realized. Here we have implemented such a real-time stabilizing quantum feedback scheme following a method inspired by ref. 13. It prepares on demand photon number states (Fock states) of a microwave field in a superconducting cavity, and subsequently reverses the effects of decoherence-induced field quantum jumps. The sensor is a beam of atoms crossing the cavity, which repeatedly performs weak quantum non-demolition measurements of the photon number. The controller is implemented in a real-time computer commanding the actuator, which injects adjusted small classical fields into the cavity between measurements. The microwave field is a quantum oscillator usable as a quantum memory or as a quantum bus swapping information between atoms. Our experiment demonstrates that active control can generate non-classical states of this oscillator and combat their decoherence, and is a significant step towards the implementation of complex quantum information operations.

Year:  2011        PMID: 21886159     DOI: 10.1038/nature10376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  21 in total

1.  Preparing pure photon number states of the radiation field

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-17       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Error Correcting Codes in Quantum Theory.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1996-07-29       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Experimental demonstration of fully coherent quantum feedback.

Authors:  R J Nelson; Y Weinstein; D Cory; S Lloyd
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2000-10-02       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Capture and release of a conditional state of a cavity QED system by quantum feedback.

Authors:  W P Smith; J E Reiner; L A Orozco; S Kuhr; H M Wiseman
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2002-09-04       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Preparation and measurement of three-qubit entanglement in a superconducting circuit.

Authors:  L Dicarlo; M D Reed; L Sun; B R Johnson; J M Chow; J M Gambetta; L Frunzio; S M Girvin; M H Devoret; R J Schoelkopf
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Optical coherent state discrimination using a closed-loop quantum measurement.

Authors:  Robert L Cook; Paul J Martin; J M Geremia
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Progressive field-state collapse and quantum non-demolition photon counting.

Authors:  Christine Guerlin; Julien Bernu; Samuel Deléglise; Clément Sayrin; Sébastien Gleyzes; Stefan Kuhr; Michel Brune; Jean-Michel Raimond; Serge Haroche
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Photon-by-photon feedback control of a single-atom trajectory.

Authors:  A Kubanek; M Koch; C Sames; A Ourjoumtsev; P W H Pinkse; K Murr; G Rempe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Properties of a quantum system during the time interval between two measurements.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev A       Date:  1990-01-01       Impact factor: 3.140

10.  Experimental repetitive quantum error correction.

Authors:  Philipp Schindler; Julio T Barreiro; Thomas Monz; Volckmar Nebendahl; Daniel Nigg; Michael Chwalla; Markus Hennrich; Rainer Blatt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  24 in total

1.  Measurement-based control of a mechanical oscillator at its thermal decoherence rate.

Authors:  D J Wilson; V Sudhir; N Piro; R Schilling; A Ghadimi; T J Kippenberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Observing single quantum trajectories of a superconducting quantum bit.

Authors:  K W Murch; S J Weber; C Macklin; I Siddiqi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Autonomously stabilized entanglement between two superconducting quantum bits.

Authors:  S Shankar; M Hatridge; Z Leghtas; K M Sliwa; A Narla; U Vool; S M Girvin; L Frunzio; M Mirrahimi; M H Devoret
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Dissipative production of a maximally entangled steady state of two quantum bits.

Authors:  Y Lin; J P Gaebler; F Reiter; T R Tan; R Bowler; A S Sørensen; D Leibfried; D J Wineland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Mechanical quantum systems controlled.

Authors:  Michael R Vanner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Stabilizing Rabi oscillations in a superconducting qubit using quantum feedback.

Authors:  R Vijay; C Macklin; D H Slichter; S J Weber; K W Murch; R Naik; A N Korotkov; I Siddiqi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Mapping the optimal route between two quantum states.

Authors:  S J Weber; A Chantasri; J Dressel; A N Jordan; K W Murch; I Siddiqi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Coherent feedback control of a single qubit in diamond.

Authors:  Masashi Hirose; Paola Cappellaro
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Quantum control of a nanoparticle optically levitated in cryogenic free space.

Authors:  Felix Tebbenjohanns; M Luisa Mattana; Massimiliano Rossi; Martin Frimmer; Lukas Novotny
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Real-time optimal quantum control of mechanical motion at room temperature.

Authors:  Lorenzo Magrini; Philipp Rosenzweig; Constanze Bach; Andreas Deutschmann-Olek; Sebastian G Hofer; Sungkun Hong; Nikolai Kiesel; Andreas Kugi; Markus Aspelmeyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.