Literature DB >> 24106908

Challenges and prospects in the telemetry of insects.

W Daniel Kissling1, David E Pattemore, Melanie Hagen.   

Abstract

Radio telemetry has been widely used to study the space use and movement behaviour of vertebrates, but transmitter sizes have only recently become small enough to allow tracking of insects under natural field conditions. Here, we review the available literature on insect telemetry using active (battery-powered) radio transmitters and compare this technology to harmonic radar and radio frequency identification (RFID) which use passive tags (i.e. without a battery). The first radio telemetry studies with insects were published in the late 1980s, and subsequent studies have addressed aspects of insect ecology, behaviour and evolution. Most insect telemetry studies have focused on habitat use and movement, including quantification of movement paths, home range sizes, habitat selection, and movement distances. Fewer studies have addressed foraging behaviour, activity patterns, migratory strategies, or evolutionary aspects. The majority of radio telemetry studies have been conducted outside the tropics, usually with beetles (Coleoptera) and crickets (Orthoptera), but bees (Hymenoptera), dobsonflies (Megaloptera), and dragonflies (Odonata) have also been radio-tracked. In contrast to the active transmitters used in radio telemetry, the much lower weight of harmonic radar and RFID tags allows them to be used with a broader range of insect taxa. However, the fixed detection zone of a stationary radar unit (< 1 km diameter) and the restricted detection distance of RFID tags (usually < 1-5 m) constitute major constraints of these technologies compared to radio telemetry. Most of the active transmitters in radio telemetry have been applied to insects with a body mass exceeding 1 g, but smaller species in the range 0.2-0.5 g (e.g. bumblebees and orchid bees) have now also been tracked. Current challenges of radio-tracking insects in the field are related to the constraints of a small transmitter, including short battery life (7-21 days), limited tracking range on the ground (100-500 m), and a transmitter weight that sometimes approaches the weight of a given insect (the ratio of tag mass to body mass varies from 2 to 100%). The attachment of radio transmitters may constrain insect behaviour and incur significant energetic costs, but few studies have addressed this in detail. Future radio telemetry studies should address (i) a larger number of species from different insect families and functional groups, (ii) a better coverage of tropical regions, (iii) intraspecific variability between sexes, ages, castes, and individuals, and (iv) a larger tracking range via aerial surveys with helicopters and aeroplanes equipped with external antennae. Furthermore, field and laboratory studies, including observational and experimental approaches as well as theoretical modelling, could help to clarify the behavioural and energetic consequences of transmitter attachment. Finally, the development of commercially available systems for automated tracking and potential future options of insect telemetry from space will provide exciting new avenues for quantifying movement and space use of insects from local to global spatial scales.
© 2013 The Authors. Biological Reviews © 2013 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automated telemetry; body size; dispersal; invertebrates; landscape ecology; radio tag; radio tracking; receiver; satellite

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24106908     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  25 in total

1.  Deep learning and computer vision will transform entomology.

Authors:  Toke T Høye; Johanna Ärje; Kim Bjerge; Oskar L P Hansen; Alexandros Iosifidis; Florian Leese; Hjalte M R Mann; Kristian Meissner; Claus Melvad; Jenni Raitoharju
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  GRAPHITE: A Graphical Environment for Scalable in situ Video Tracking of Moving Insects.

Authors:  B J Rossetti; T Dynes; B Brosi; J C de Roode; J Kong
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 7.781

Review 3.  Methods in field chronobiology.

Authors:  Davide M Dominoni; Susanne Åkesson; Raymond Klaassen; Kamiel Spoelstra; Martin Bulla
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Potential for identification of wild night-flying moths by remote infrared microscopy.

Authors:  Meng Li; Clara Seinsche; Samuel Jansson; Julio Hernandez; Jadranka Rota; Eric Warrant; Mikkel Brydegaard
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.293

5.  Assessing the effect of complex ground types on ground-dwelling arthropod movements with video monitoring: Dealing with concealed movements under a layer of plant residues.

Authors:  Blanche Collard; Philippe Tixier; Dominique Carval; Claire Lavigne; Thomas Delattre
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Tracking the invasive hornet Vespa velutina in complex environments by means of a harmonic radar.

Authors:  Simone Lioy; Daniela Laurino; Marco Porporato; Riccardo Maggiora; Daniele Milanesio; Maurice Saccani; Peter J Mazzoglio; Aulo Manino
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Low relative error in consumer-grade GPS units make them ideal for measuring small-scale animal movement patterns.

Authors:  Greg A Breed; Paul M Severns
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Short-term behavioural impact contrasts with long-term fitness consequences of biologging in a long-lived seabird.

Authors:  Natasha Gillies; Annette L Fayet; Oliver Padget; Martyna Syposz; Joe Wynn; Sarah Bond; James Evry; Holly Kirk; Akiko Shoji; Ben Dean; Robin Freeman; Tim Guilford
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Self-Powered Smart Beehive Monitoring and Control System (SBMaCS).

Authors:  Elias Ntawuzumunsi; Santhi Kumaran; Louis Sibomana
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Integrating high-speed videos in capture-mark-recapture studies of insects.

Authors:  Rassim Khelifa; Hayat Mahdjoub; Leithen K M'Gonigle; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.