Literature DB >> 24103913

Restoration of sensorimotor functions after spinal cord injury.

Volker Dietz1, Karim Fouad.   

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to discuss the achievements and perspectives regarding rehabilitation of sensorimotor functions after spinal cord injury. In the first part we discuss clinical approaches based on neuroplasticity, a term referring to all adaptive and maladaptive changes within the sensorimotor systems triggered by a spinal cord injury. Neuroplasticity can be facilitated through the training of movements with assistance as needed, and/or by electrical stimulation techniques. The success of such training in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury critically depends on the presence of physiological proprioceptive input to the spinal cord leading to meaningful muscle activations during movement performances. The addition of rehabilitation technology, such as robotic devices allows for longer training times and provision of feedback information regarding changes in movement performance. Nevertheless, the improvement of function by such approaches for rehabilitation is limited. In the second part, we discuss preclinical approaches to restore function by compensating for the loss of descending input to spinal networks following complete spinal cord injury. This can be achieved with stimulation of spinal networks or approaches to restore their descending input. Electrical and pharmacological stimulation of spinal neural networks is still in an experimental stage; and despite promising repair studies in animal models, translations to humans up to now have not been convincing. It is likely that combinations of techniques targeting the promotion of axonal regeneration and meaningful plasticity are necessary to advance the restoration of function. In the future, refinement of animal studies may contribute to greater translational success.

Entities:  

Keywords:  neuronal plasticity; neurorehabilitation; rehabilitation engineering; spinal cord injury; spinal cord injury repair

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24103913     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awt262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  62 in total

1.  Electrical neuromodulation of the cervical spinal cord facilitates forelimb skilled function recovery in spinal cord injured rats.

Authors:  Monzurul Alam; Guillermo Garcia-Alias; Benita Jin; Jonathan Keyes; Hui Zhong; Roland R Roy; Yury Gerasimenko; Daniel C Lu; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Blocking Autophagy in Oligodendrocytes Limits Functional Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Sujata Saraswat Ohri; Andrew N Bankston; S Ashley Mullins; Yu Liu; Kariena R Andres; Jason E Beare; Russell M Howard; Darlene A Burke; Amberly S Riegler; Allison E Smith; Michal Hetman; Scott R Whittemore
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Brain-controlled neuromuscular stimulation to drive neural plasticity and functional recovery.

Authors:  C Ethier; J A Gallego; L E Miller
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Ability of sit-to-stand with hands reflects neurological and functional impairments in ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Wilairat Saensook; Lugkana Mato; Nattaset Manimmanakorn; Pipatana Amatachaya; Thanat Sooknuan; Sugalya Amatachaya
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Electrical Stimulation as a Tool to Promote Plasticity of the Injured Spinal Cord.

Authors:  Andrew S Jack; Caitlin Hurd; John Martin; Karim Fouad
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Stimulation Promotes Long-Term Recovery of Upper Extremity Function in Chronic Tetraplegia.

Authors:  Fatma Inanici; Soshi Samejima; Parag Gad; V Reggie Edgerton; Christoph P Hofstetter; Chet T Moritz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Evaluation of optimal electrode configurations for epidural spinal cord stimulation in cervical spinal cord injured rats.

Authors:  Monzurul Alam; Guillermo Garcia-Alias; Prithvi K Shah; Yury Gerasimenko; Hui Zhong; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Dual-Task Obstacle Crossing Training Could Immediately Improve Ability to Control a Complex Motor Task and Cognitive Activity in Chronic Ambulatory Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Sugalya Amatachaya; Kitiyawadee Srisim; Preeda Arrayawichanon; Thiwabhorn Thaweewannakij; Pipatana Amatachaya
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2019-05-16

9.  Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Rehabilitative Training Enhances Motor Recovery After Bilateral Spinal Cord Injury to Cervical Forelimb Motor Pools.

Authors:  Michael J Darrow; Miranda Torres; Maria J Sosa; Tanya T Danaphongse; Zainab Haider; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.919

10.  CSPGs inhibit axon branching by impairing mitochondria-dependent regulation of actin dynamics and axonal translation.

Authors:  Rajiv Sainath; Andrea Ketschek; Leah Grandi; Gianluca Gallo
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.964

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.