Literature DB >> 24103253

Low-methane yield sheep have smaller rumens and shorter rumen retention time.

John P Goopy1, Alastair Donaldson1, Roger Hegarty2, Philip E Vercoe3, Fay Haynes2, Mark Barnett2, V Hutton Oddy1.   

Abstract

In the present study, following the measurement of methane emissions from 160 mature ewes three times, a subset of twenty ewes was selected for further emission and physiological studies. Ewes were selected on the basis of methane yield (MY; g CH4/kg DM intake) being low (Low MY: >1 sd below the mean; n 10) or high (High MY: >1 sd above the mean; n 10) when fed a blended chaff ration at a fixed feeding level (1·2-fold maintenance energy requirements). The difference between the Low- and High-MY groups observed at the time of selection was maintained (P= 0·001) when remeasured 1-7 months later during digesta kinetics studies. Low MY was associated with a shorter mean retention time of particulate (P< 0·01) and liquid (P< 0·001) digesta, less amounts of rumen particulate contents (P< 0·01) and a smaller rumen volume (P< 0·05), but not apparent DM digestibility (P= 0·27) or urinary allantoin excretion (P= 0·89). Computer tomography scanning of the sheep's rumens after an overnight fast revealed a trend towards the Low-MY sheep having more clearly demarcated rumen gas and liquid phases (P= 0·10). These findings indicate that the selection of ruminants for low MY may have important consequences for an animal's nutritional physiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24103253     DOI: 10.1017/S0007114513002936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  47 in total

1.  Buccal swabbing as a noninvasive method to determine bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryotic microbial community structures in the rumen.

Authors:  Sandra Kittelmann; Michelle R Kirk; Arjan Jonker; Alan McCulloch; Peter H Janssen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  The rumen microbiome: balancing food security and environmental impacts.

Authors:  Itzhak Mizrahi; R John Wallace; Sarah Moraïs
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Replacement of Tifton hay by spineless cactus in Girolando post-weaned heifers´ diets.

Authors:  Leonardo José Assis de Barros; Marcelo de Andrade Ferreira; Julio César Vieira de Oliveira; Djalma Cordeiro Dos Santos; Juana Catarina Cariri Chagas; Adryanne Marjorie Souza Vitor Alves; Aghata Elins Moreira da Silva; Wandemberg Rocha Freitas
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  RUMINANT NUTRITION SYMPOSIUM: Tiny but mighty: the role of the rumen microbes in livestock production.

Authors:  Kristi M Cammack; Kathleen J Austin; William R Lamberson; Gavin C Conant; Hannah C Cunningham
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  What is the digestibility and caloric value of different botanical parts in corn residue to cattle?1.

Authors:  Emily A Petzel; Evan C Titgemeyer; Alexander J Smart; Kristin E Hales; Andrew P Foote; Subash Acharya; Eric A Bailey; Jeffrey E Held; Derek W Brake
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Eating Time as a Genetic Indicator of Methane Emissions and Feed Efficiency in Australian Maternal Composite Sheep.

Authors:  Boris J Sepulveda; Stephanie K Muir; Sunduimijid Bolormaa; Matthew I Knight; Ralph Behrendt; Iona M MacLeod; Jennie E Pryce; Hans D Daetwyler
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Lambs fed fresh winter forage rape (Brassica napus L.) emit less methane than those fed perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.), and possible mechanisms behind the difference.

Authors:  Xuezhao Sun; Gemma Henderson; Faith Cox; German Molano; Scott J Harrison; Dongwen Luo; Peter H Janssen; David Pacheco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Animal board invited review: genetic possibilities to reduce enteric methane emissions from ruminants.

Authors:  N K Pickering; V H Oddy; J Basarab; K Cammack; B Hayes; R S Hegarty; J Lassen; J C McEwan; S Miller; C S Pinares-Patiño; Y de Haas
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Non-invasive methods for the determination of body and carcass composition in livestock: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound: invited review.

Authors:  A M Scholz; L Bünger; J Kongsro; U Baulain; A D Mitchell
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Two different bacterial community types are linked with the low-methane emission trait in sheep.

Authors:  Sandra Kittelmann; Cesar S Pinares-Patiño; Henning Seedorf; Michelle R Kirk; Siva Ganesh; John C McEwan; Peter H Janssen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.