Literature DB >> 24102812

The comparison between implant stability quotient and bone-implant contact revisited: an experiment in Beagle dog.

Carolina Manresa1, Manel Bosch2, José J Echeverría1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) is applied clinically for the assessment of implant stability, and the relevance of this application is widely accepted. However, the relationship between resonance frequency (RF) and other parameters of implant stability, such as the histomorphometrical bone-to-implant contact (BIC) parameter, has become controversial in the last decade.
OBJECTIVE: To analyse and clarify the controversial relationship between RF and histomorphometrical BIC measurements.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 36 dental implants (9 mm length, Ø 4.0 mm; Biohorizons(®) Implant Systems Inc., Birmingham, AL, USA) with a soluble blasting media (sandblasting with soluble particles) surface were implanted in six beagle dog mandibles. RFA assessments were performed with a magnetic Osstel Mentor(®) device at the time of implant installation, and during the monitoring period at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8, before implant retrieval. The dogs were sacrificed and the implants were removed in block after 8, 6, 4, 2, 1 and 0 weeks, respectively. One group was obtained at time 0, immediately after the implantation. The samples were embedded in methyl methacrylate polymers (Technovit(®) ) and cut along their long axis. BIC values were assessed by a non-subjective and systematic method based on backscattered scanning electron microscopy (BS-SEM) images. BIC% at the different time points was compared with the corresponding implant stability quotient (ISQ) values of the RFA assessment.
RESULTS: No statistically significant correlation between BIC and ISQ values (Osstell Mentor(®) ) was identified. The absence of a relationship between these two parameters is in agreement with several previous studies in humans and experimental animals.
CONCLUSIONS: The lack of correlation between BIC and ISQ values suggests that ISQ as determined by RFA is not able to identify the relationship between RF and histomorphometrical data.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  backscattered scanning electron microscopy; bone-to-implant contact; histomorphometric analysis; implant stability; osseointegration; resonance frequency

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24102812     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  15 in total

1.  Effects on the torsional vibration behavior in the investigation of dental implant osseointegration using resonance frequency analysis: a numerical approach.

Authors:  Min Zhai; Bing Li; Dehua Li
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Correlation between resonance frequency, insertion torque and bone-implant contact in self-cutting threaded implants.

Authors:  Yahya Açil; Jan Sievers; Aydin Gülses; Mustafa Ayna; Jörg Wiltfang; Hendrik Terheyden
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  3D full-field strain in bone-implant and bone-tooth constructs and their morphological influential factors.

Authors:  Yuxiao Zhou; Chujie Gong; Mehran Hossaini-Zadeh; Jing Du
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2020-05-19

4.  Customized SmartPeg for measurement of resonance frequency of mini dental implants.

Authors:  Jagjit Singh Dhaliwal; Rubens F Albuquerque; Ali Fakhry; Sukhbir Kaur; Jocelyne S Feine
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-02-01

5.  Resonance frequency analysis of dental implants placed at the posterior maxilla varying the surface treatment only: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Marcelo M Novellino; Newton Sesma; Piero R Zanardi; Dalva C Laganá
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.932

Review 6.  Treatment concepts for the posterior maxilla and mandible: short implants versus long implants in augmented bone.

Authors:  Daniel Stefan Thoma; Jae-Kook Cha; Ui-Won Jung
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.614

7.  Monitoring the Changes of Material Properties at Bone-Implant Interface during the Healing Process In Vivo: A Viscoelastic Investigation.

Authors:  Hsiang-Ho Chen; Wei-Yi Lai; Tze-Jian Chee; Ya-Hui Chan; Sheng-Wei Feng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Relationship between Implant Length and Implant Stability of Single-Implant Restorations: A 12-Month Follow-Up Clinical Study.

Authors:  Juan Manuel Aragoneses; Javier Aragoneses; Vanessa Arlette Brugal; Margarita Gomez; Ana Suarez
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.430

9.  Development of a quantitative preclinical screening model for implant osseointegration in rat tail vertebra.

Authors:  Sándor Farkasdi; Dávid Pammer; Róbert Rácz; Gergely Hriczó-Koperdák; Bence Tamás Szabó; Csaba Dobó-Nagy; Beáta Kerémi; József Blazsek; Frederic Cuisinier; Gang Wu; Gábor Varga
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 10.  Clinical Assessment of Dental Implant Stability During Follow-Up: What Is Actually Measured, and Perspectives.

Authors:  Elisabetta M Zanetti; Giulia Pascoletti; Michele Calì; Cristina Bignardi; Giordano Franceschini
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.