Literature DB >> 24102625

Commercial DNA extraction kits impact observed microbial community composition in permafrost samples.

Tatiana A Vishnivetskaya1, Alice C Layton, Maggie C Y Lau, Archana Chauhan, Karen R Cheng, Arthur J Meyers, Jasity R Murphy, Alexandra W Rogers, Geetha S Saarunya, Daniel E Williams, Susan M Pfiffner, John P Biggerstaff, Brandon T Stackhouse, Tommy J Phelps, Lyle Whyte, Gary S Sayler, Tullis C Onstott.   

Abstract

The total community genomic DNA (gDNA) from permafrost was extracted using four commercial DNA extraction kits. The gDNAs were compared using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) targeting 16S rRNA genes and bacterial diversity analyses obtained via 454 pyrosequencing of the 16S rRNA (V3 region) amplified in single or nested PCR. The FastDNA(®) SPIN (FDS) Kit provided the highest gDNA yields and 16S rRNA gene concentrations, followed by MoBio PowerSoil(®) (PS) and MoBio PowerLyzer™ (PL) kits. The lowest gDNA yields and 16S rRNA gene concentrations were from the Meta-G-Nome™ (MGN) DNA Isolation Kit. Bacterial phyla identified in all DNA extracts were similar to that found in other soils and were dominated by Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Gemmatimonadetes, Proteobacteria, and Acidobacteria. Weighted UniFrac and statistical analyses indicated that bacterial community compositions derived from FDS, PS, and PL extracts were similar to each other. However, the bacterial community structure from the MGN extracts differed from other kits exhibiting higher proportions of easily lysed β- and γ-Proteobacteria and lower proportions of Actinobacteria and Methylocystaceae important in carbon cycling. These results indicate that gDNA yields differ between the extraction kits, but reproducible bacterial community structure analysis may be accomplished using gDNAs from the three bead-beating lysis extraction kits.
© 2013 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA; bacteria; fluorescent in situ hybridization; mCherry seeded approach; pyrosequences; qPCR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24102625     DOI: 10.1111/1574-6941.12219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol        ISSN: 0168-6496            Impact factor:   4.194


  33 in total

1.  An active atmospheric methane sink in high Arctic mineral cryosols.

Authors:  M C Y Lau; B T Stackhouse; A C Layton; A Chauhan; T A Vishnivetskaya; K Chourey; J Ronholm; N C S Mykytczuk; P C Bennett; G Lamarche-Gagnon; N Burton; W H Pollard; C R Omelon; D M Medvigy; R L Hettich; S M Pfiffner; L G Whyte; T C Onstott
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Suitability of various DNA extraction methods for a traditional Chinese paocai system.

Authors:  Nan Zhao; Jialiang Cai; Chuchu Zhang; Zhuang Guo; Wenwei Lu; Bo Yang; Feng-Wei Tian; Xiao-Ming Liu; Hao Zhang; Wei Chen
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 3.269

3.  Exploring the Root Microbiome: Extracting Bacterial Community Data from the Soil, Rhizosphere, and Root Endosphere.

Authors:  Tuesday Simmons; Daniel F Caddell; Siwen Deng; Devin Coleman-Derr
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Influence of DNA extraction method, 16S rRNA targeted hypervariable regions, and sample origin on microbial diversity detected by 454 pyrosequencing in marine chemosynthetic ecosystems.

Authors:  Perrine Cruaud; Adrien Vigneron; Céline Lucchetti-Miganeh; Pierre Emmanuel Ciron; Anne Godfroy; Marie-Anne Cambon-Bonavita
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Removal of Exogenous Materials from the Outer Portion of Frozen Cores to Investigate the Ancient Biological Communities Harbored Inside.

Authors:  Robyn A Barbato; Natàlia Garcia-Reyero; Karen Foley; Robert Jones; Zoe Courville; Thomas Douglas; Edward Perkins; Charles M Reynolds
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-07-03       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Optimised biomolecular extraction for metagenomic analysis of microbial biofilms from high-mountain streams.

Authors:  Susheel Bhanu Busi; Paraskevi Pramateftaki; Jade Brandani; Stilianos Fodelianakis; Hannes Peter; Rashi Halder; Paul Wilmes; Tom J Battin
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 7.  Metagenomics: tools and insights for analyzing next-generation sequencing data derived from biodiversity studies.

Authors:  Anastasis Oulas; Christina Pavloudi; Paraskevi Polymenakou; Georgios A Pavlopoulos; Nikolas Papanikolaou; Georgios Kotoulas; Christos Arvanitidis; Ioannis Iliopoulos
Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights       Date:  2015-05-05

8.  Effort versus Reward: Preparing Samples for Fungal Community Characterization in High-Throughput Sequencing Surveys of Soils.

Authors:  Zewei Song; Dan Schlatter; Peter Kennedy; Linda L Kinkel; H Corby Kistler; Nhu Nguyen; Scott T Bates
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Metagenomes from thawing low-soil-organic-carbon mineral cryosols and permafrost of the canadian high arctic.

Authors:  Archana Chauhan; Alice C Layton; Tatiana A Vishnivetskaya; Daniel Williams; Susan M Pfiffner; Bhanu Rekepalli; Brandon Stackhouse; Maggie C Y Lau; Tommy J Phelps; Nadia Mykytczuk; Jennifer Ronholm; Lyle Whyte; Tullis C Onstott; Gary S Sayler
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2014-11-20

10.  Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis.

Authors:  Agata Wesolowska-Andersen; Martin Iain Bahl; Vera Carvalho; Karsten Kristiansen; Thomas Sicheritz-Pontén; Ramneek Gupta; Tine Rask Licht
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 14.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.