Literature DB >> 24096438

Labor induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix: double balloon catheter versus dinoprostone.

Katarzyna Suffecool, Barak M Rosenn, Stefanie Kam, Juliet Mushi, Janelle Foroutan, Kimberly Herrera.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the efficacy of the double-balloon catheter and dinoprostone for induction of labor among nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix. STUDY
DESIGN: Nulliparous women with a Bishop score <6 were randomized to receive a 10-mg intra-vaginal dinoprostone insert or a double-balloon catheter. Primary outcome was time to delivery. Statistical analyses were performed by intention to treat using the chi-square, Fisher's exact, and Student's t-test, as appropriate.
RESULTS: The mean induction-to-delivery time was shorter in the double-balloon group as compared to the dinoprostone group (17.9±5.8 vs. 26.3±9.7 h) as was the time from induction to vaginal delivery (19.13±5 vs. 24.45±8.7 h, respectively). More women in the catheter group were delivered within 24 h compared to the dinoprostone group (87.1% vs. 47.4%). Approximately 50% of women in both groups delivered by cesarean section.
CONCLUSION: Induction of labor with the double-balloon catheter in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix is associated with a shorter time to delivery compared to dinoprostone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24096438     DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2013-0152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinat Med        ISSN: 0300-5577            Impact factor:   1.901


  7 in total

Review 1.  The Renaissance of Transcervical Balloon Catheters for Cervical Ripening and Labour Induction.

Authors:  W Rath; S Kehl
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Effectiveness of Dinoprostone and Cook's Balloon for Labor Induction in Primipara Women at Term.

Authors:  Hui Du; Na Zhang; Chan-Yun Xiao; Guo-Qiang Sun; Yun Zhao
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2020-10-29

3.  Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Induction of Labor in Women with Low-Risk Pregnancies: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Nguyen Duy Anh; Tran Anh Duc; Nguyen-Thi Thu Ha; Duong-Thi Tra Giang; Do Tuan Dat; Phan-Thi Huyen Thuong; Nguyen Khac Toan; Nguyen Tai Duc; Nguyen Minh Duc
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2022-02

4.  Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ge Zhao; Guang Song; Jing Liu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 5.  Mechanical methods for induction of labour.

Authors:  Marieke Dt de Vaan; Mieke Lg Ten Eikelder; Marta Jozwiak; Kirsten R Palmer; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Kitty Wm Bloemenkamp; Ben Willem J Mol; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-18

6.  Double balloon catheters: A promising tool for induction of labor in multiparous women with unfavorable cervices

Authors:  Fırat Tülek; Ali Gemici; Feride Söylemez
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2018-09-17

7.  Double Balloon Catheter (Plus Oxytocin) versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Term Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RUBAPRO).

Authors:  Eric Devillard; Fanny Petillon; Marion Rouzaire; Bruno Pereira; Marie Accoceberry; Céline Houlle; Lydie Dejou-Bouillet; Pamela Bouchet; Amélie Delabaere; Denis Gallot
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.