Eric K Shang1, Derek P Nathan1, Edward Y Woo2, Ronald M Fairman2, Grace J Wang2, Robert C Gorman3, Joseph H Gorman3, Benjamin M Jackson4. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa; Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa. 3. Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa; Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa. 4. Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa; Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa. Electronic address: benjamin.jackson@uphs.upenn.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Growing evidence suggests that peak wall stress (PWS) derived from finite element analysis (FEA) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) predicts clinical outcomes better than diameter alone. Prior models assume uniform wall thickness (UWT). We hypothesize that the inclusion of locally variable wall thickness (VWT) into FEA of AAAs will improve its ability to predict clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patients with AAAs (n = 26) undergoing radiologic surveillance were identified. Custom MATLAB algorithms generated UWT and VWT aortic geometries from computed tomography angiography images, which were subsequently loaded with systolic blood pressure using FEA. PWS and aneurysm expansion (as a proxy for rupture risk and the need for repair) were examined. RESULTS: The average radiologic follow-up time was 22.0 ± 13.6 months and the average aneurysm expansion rate was 2.8 ± 1.7 mm/y. PWS in VWT models significantly differed from PWS in UWT models (238 ± 68 vs 212 ± 73 kPa; P = .025). In our sample, initial aortic diameter was not found to be correlated with aneurysm expansion (r = 0.26; P = .19). A stronger correlation was found between aneurysm expansion and PWS derived from VWT models compared with PWS from UWT models (r = 0.86 vs r = 0.58; P = .032 by Fisher r to Z transformation). CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of locally VWT significantly improved the correlation between PWS and aneurysm expansion. Aortic wall thickness should be incorporated into future FEA models to accurately predict clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: Growing evidence suggests that peak wall stress (PWS) derived from finite element analysis (FEA) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) predicts clinical outcomes better than diameter alone. Prior models assume uniform wall thickness (UWT). We hypothesize that the inclusion of locally variable wall thickness (VWT) into FEA of AAAs will improve its ability to predict clinical outcomes. METHODS:Patients with AAAs (n = 26) undergoing radiologic surveillance were identified. Custom MATLAB algorithms generated UWT and VWT aortic geometries from computed tomography angiography images, which were subsequently loaded with systolic blood pressure using FEA. PWS and aneurysm expansion (as a proxy for rupture risk and the need for repair) were examined. RESULTS: The average radiologic follow-up time was 22.0 ± 13.6 months and the average aneurysm expansion rate was 2.8 ± 1.7 mm/y. PWS in VWT models significantly differed from PWS in UWT models (238 ± 68 vs 212 ± 73 kPa; P = .025). In our sample, initial aortic diameter was not found to be correlated with aneurysm expansion (r = 0.26; P = .19). A stronger correlation was found between aneurysm expansion and PWS derived from VWT models compared with PWS from UWT models (r = 0.86 vs r = 0.58; P = .032 by Fisher r to Z transformation). CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of locally VWT significantly improved the correlation between PWS and aneurysm expansion. Aortic wall thickness should be incorporated into future FEA models to accurately predict clinical outcomes.
Authors: Shalin A Parikh; Raymond Gomez; Mirunalini Thirugnanasambandam; Sathyajeeth S Chauhan; Victor De Oliveira; Satish C Muluk; Mark K Eskandari; Ender A Finol Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Thomas Schmitz-Rixen; M Keese; M Hakimi; A Peters; D Böckler; K Nelson; R T Grundmann Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2016-03-21 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Lik Chuan Lee; Martin Genet; Alan B Dang; Liang Ge; Julius M Guccione; Mark B Ratcliffe Journal: J Card Surg Date: 2014-04-07 Impact factor: 1.620
Authors: Noel Conlisk; Rachael O Forsythe; Lyam Hollis; Barry J Doyle; Olivia M B McBride; Jennifer M J Robson; Chengjia Wang; Calum D Gray; Scott I K Semple; Tom MacGillivray; Edwin J R van Beek; David E Newby; Peter R Hoskins Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2017-08-14 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Moritz Lindquist Liljeqvist; Marko Bogdanovic; Antti Siika; T Christian Gasser; Rebecka Hultgren; Joy Roy Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-09-10 Impact factor: 4.379