Literature DB >> 20921927

Nidek MP1 is able to detect subtle decline in function in inherited and age-related atrophic macular disease with stable visual acuity.

Fred K Chen1, Praveen J Patel, Andrew R Webster, Peter J Coffey, Adnan Tufail, Lyndon Da Cruz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the Nidek MP1 microperimeter (NAVIS software Version 1.7; Nidek Technologies, Padua, Italy) can detect functional decline in progressive atrophic macular disease with stable visual acuity.
METHODS: Nine eyes of nine patients with stable acuity but progressive inherited or age-related atrophic macular disease evident on fundus autofluorescence imaging were reviewed. Each patient underwent 3 consecutive microperimetry tests at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Acuity, fixation, and microperimetry tests were performed at each visit. Changes in acuity, fixation stability, and macular sensitivity were analyzed. To detect regional change in retinal sensitivity, the test grid was divided into clusters based on either topographical or functional features. The mean sensitivities within each zone were also compared across the three visits.
RESULTS: In this cohort, there was no significant change in visual acuity, fixation stability, and macular sensitivity over 1 year. However, significant decline in mean sensitivity within the central macula and test loci adjacent to dense scotoma was found (P = 0.004 and 0.002, respectively). In contrast, mean sensitivity elsewhere remained stable.
CONCLUSION: The MP1 can detect significant change in regional retinal sensitivity within 12 months in patients with progressive atrophic macular disease and stable acuity. Individualized analysis of regional sensitivity may be a useful method for quantifying microperimetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20921927     DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181e46af3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Retina        ISSN: 0275-004X            Impact factor:   4.256


  17 in total

1.  Macular function in macular degenerations: repeatability of microperimetry as a potential outcome measure for ABCA4-associated retinopathy trials.

Authors:  Artur V Cideciyan; Malgorzata Swider; Tomas S Aleman; Willam J Feuer; Sharon B Schwartz; Robert C Russell; Janet D Steinberg; Edwin M Stone; Samuel G Jacobson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Longitudinal Microperimetric Changes of Macular Sensitivity in Stargardt Disease After 12 Months: ProgStar Report No. 13.

Authors:  Etienne M Schönbach; Rupert W Strauss; Beatriz Muñoz; Yulia Wolfson; Mohamed A Ibrahim; David G Birch; Eberhart Zrenner; Janet S Sunness; Michael S Ip; SriniVas R Sadda; Sheila K West; Hendrik P N Scholl
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 7.389

Review 3.  Fundus-driven perimetry (microperimetry) compared to conventional static automated perimetry: similarities, differences, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Jennifer H Acton; Vivienne C Greenstein
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 1.882

Review 4.  Microperimetry for geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Karl G Csaky; Praveen J Patel; Yasir J Sepah; David G Birch; Diana V Do; Michael S Ip; Robyn H Guymer; Chi D Luu; Shamika Gune; Hugh Lin; Daniela Ferrara
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 6.048

5.  Macular function and morphologic features in juvenile stargardt disease: longitudinal study.

Authors:  Francesco Testa; Paolo Melillo; Valentina Di Iorio; Ada Orrico; Marcella Attanasio; Settimio Rossi; Francesca Simonelli
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Three-year follow-up after unilateral subretinal delivery of adeno-associated virus in patients with Leber congenital Amaurosis type 2.

Authors:  Francesco Testa; Albert M Maguire; Settimio Rossi; Eric A Pierce; Paolo Melillo; Kathleen Marshall; Sandro Banfi; Enrico M Surace; Junwei Sun; Carmela Acerra; J Fraser Wright; Jennifer Wellman; Katherine A High; Alberto Auricchio; Jean Bennett; Francesca Simonelli
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  The effect of photodynamic therapy on macular sensitivity in eyes with acute central serous chorioretinopathy.

Authors:  Stefan Hagen; Siamak Ansari-Shahrezaei; Eva Smretschnig; Carl Glittenberg; Ilse Krebs; Alexandra Graf; Susanne Binder
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Test-Retest Reproducibility of the Microperimeter MP3 With Fundus Image Tracking in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Macular Disease.

Authors:  Stefan Palkovits; Nino Hirnschall; Stefan Georgiev; Christoph Leisser; Oliver Findl
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Intersession test-retest variability of conventional and novel parameters using the MP-1 microperimeter.

Authors:  Evan N Wong; David A Mackey; William H Morgan; Fred Kuanfu Chen
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-23

10.  Intersession Test-Retest Variability of Microperimetry in Type 2 Macular Telangiectasia.

Authors:  Evan N Wong; Jehan D A De Soyza; David A Mackey; Ian J Constable; Fred K Chen
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.