OBJECTIVE: Temporomandibular dysfunction involves osteoarthritis of the TMJ, including degeneration and morphologic changes of the mandibular condyle. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of novel 3D-UTE MRI versus micro-CT (μCT) for quantitative evaluation of mandibular condyle morphology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine TMJ condyle specimens were harvested from cadavers (2 M, 3 F; age 85 ± 10 years, mean ± SD). 3D-UTE MRI (TR = 50 ms, TE = 0.05 ms, 104-μm isotropic-voxel) was performed using a 3-T MR scanner and μCT (18-μm isotropic-voxel) was also performed. MR datasets were spatially registered with a μCT dataset. Two observers segmented bony contours of the condyles. Fibrocartilage was segmented on the MR dataset. Using a custom program, bone and fibrocartilage surface coordinates, Gaussian curvature, volume of segmented regions, and fibrocartilage thickness were determined for quantitative evaluation of joint morphology. Agreement between techniques (MRI vs. μCT) and observers (MRI vs. MRI) for Gaussian curvature, mean curvature, and segmented volume of the bone were determined using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis. RESULTS: Between MRI and μCT, the average deviation of surface coordinates was 0.19 ± 0.15 mm, slightly higher than the spatial resolution of MRI. Average deviation of the Gaussian curvature and volume of segmented regions, from MRI to μCT, was 5.7 ± 6.5% and 6.6 ± 6.2%, respectively. ICC coefficients (MRI vs. μCT) for Gaussian curvature, mean curvature, and segmented volumes were 0.892, 0.893, and 0.972, respectively. Between observers (MRI vs. MRI), the ICC coefficients were 0.998, 0.999, and 0.997, respectively. Fibrocartilage thickness was 0.55 ± 0.11 mm, as previously described in the literature for grossly normal TMJ samples. CONCLUSIONS: 3D-UTE MR quantitative evaluation of TMJ condyle morphology ex-vivo, including surface, curvature, and segmented volume, shows high correlation against μCT and between observers. In addition, UTE MRI allows quantitative evaluation of the fibrocartilaginous condylar component.
OBJECTIVE:Temporomandibular dysfunction involves osteoarthritis of the TMJ, including degeneration and morphologic changes of the mandibular condyle. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of novel 3D-UTE MRI versus micro-CT (μCT) for quantitative evaluation of mandibular condyle morphology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine TMJ condyle specimens were harvested from cadavers (2 M, 3 F; age 85 ± 10 years, mean ± SD). 3D-UTE MRI (TR = 50 ms, TE = 0.05 ms, 104-μm isotropic-voxel) was performed using a 3-T MR scanner and μCT (18-μm isotropic-voxel) was also performed. MR datasets were spatially registered with a μCT dataset. Two observers segmented bony contours of the condyles. Fibrocartilage was segmented on the MR dataset. Using a custom program, bone and fibrocartilage surface coordinates, Gaussian curvature, volume of segmented regions, and fibrocartilage thickness were determined for quantitative evaluation of joint morphology. Agreement between techniques (MRI vs. μCT) and observers (MRI vs. MRI) for Gaussian curvature, mean curvature, and segmented volume of the bone were determined using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis. RESULTS: Between MRI and μCT, the average deviation of surface coordinates was 0.19 ± 0.15 mm, slightly higher than the spatial resolution of MRI. Average deviation of the Gaussian curvature and volume of segmented regions, from MRI to μCT, was 5.7 ± 6.5% and 6.6 ± 6.2%, respectively. ICC coefficients (MRI vs. μCT) for Gaussian curvature, mean curvature, and segmented volumes were 0.892, 0.893, and 0.972, respectively. Between observers (MRI vs. MRI), the ICC coefficients were 0.998, 0.999, and 0.997, respectively. Fibrocartilage thickness was 0.55 ± 0.11 mm, as previously described in the literature for grossly normal TMJ samples. CONCLUSIONS: 3D-UTE MR quantitative evaluation of TMJ condyle morphology ex-vivo, including surface, curvature, and segmented volume, shows high correlation against μCT and between observers. In addition, UTE MRI allows quantitative evaluation of the fibrocartilaginous condylar component.
Authors: Ines L H Reichert; Michael Benjamin; Peter D Gatehouse; Karyn E Chappell; Joanne Holmes; Taigang He; Graeme M Bydder Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Liliane R Gomes; Marcelo Gomes; Bryan Jung; Beatriz Paniagua; Antonio C Ruellas; João Roberto Gonçalves; Martin A Styner; Larry Wolford; Lucia Cevidanes Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2015-07-07
Authors: Won C Bae; Monica Tafur; Eric Y Chang; Jiang Du; Reni Biswas; Kyu-Sung Kwack; Robert Healey; Sheronda Statum; Christine B Chung Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2015-12-19 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Upasana Upadhyay Bharadwaj; Adam Coy; Daria Motamedi; Dong Sun; Gabby B Joseph; Roland Krug; Thomas M Link Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2022-01-28 Impact factor: 2.128
Authors: Justin J Kim; Hyejin Nam; Neelambar R Kaipatur; Paul W Major; Carlos Flores-Mir; Manuel O Lagravere; Daniel L Romanyk Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2019-12-03 Impact factor: 2.419