Xiaolian Su1, Yixuan Zhang2, Qiuming Gao3, Zonghui Liang4, Lidi Wan1, Lin Zhang1, Guangyu Tang1. 1. Department of Radiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 2. Department of Radiology, Hebei Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, Cangzhou, China. 3. Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 4. Department of Radiology, Shanghai Jing'an District Central Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
Background: To investigate the feasibility of quantitative ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging (UTE-MRI) techniques for assessing early cartilage degeneration in vivo. Methods: A total of 46 patients with knee pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) as the main complaint were recruited into the study. We performed MRI examinations with different quantitative UTE-MRI techniques, including UTE-based magnetization transfer (MT), UTE-adiabaticT1ρ, and UTE-T2* mapping on a 3.0T clinical magnetic resonance (MR) scanner (MR750; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA). Three regions of interest (ROIs) were manually drawn on the medial and lateral femoral condyles and the corresponding medial and lateral tibial plateaus, respectively. A total of 561 ROIs (12 ROIs for each knee) were finally included and divided into 3 groups according to the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS): normal (MOAKS 0, n=175), mild degeneration (MOAKS 1, n=283), and moderate degeneration (MOAKS 2, n=103). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tamhane's T2 test were used to compare the differences of quantitative UTE-biomarkers among different groups. The analysis of Spearman's correlation was used to assess the correlation between the UTE-biomarkers and MOAKS grading. The diagnostic efficacy of different quantitative UTE-MRI techniques for detecting mild cartilage degeneration was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The UTE-MT ratio (UTE-MTR) and the UTE-adiabatic T1ρ values had a moderate correlation with the MOAKS grading (r=-0.523, P<0.001; r=0.531, P<0.001, respectively), while the UTE-T2* was weakly correlated with the MOAKS grading (r=-0.396, P<0.001). For the normal group (MOAKS 0) and the mild group (MOAKS 1), the UTE-MTR values were 21.09%±3.03% and 17.30%±3.22%, respectively. The UTE-adiabatic T1ρ values were 30.43±6.26 ms and 35.05±8.78 ms for the normal group (MOAKS 0) and the mild group (MOAKS 1), respectively. With respect to the UTE-T2* values, the normal group (MOAKS 0) values were 21.49±3.96 ms and the mild group (MOAKS 1) values were 19.86±3.08 ms. All the differences between the 2 groups of the 3 UTE-MRI values were significant. The AUCs of the UTE-MTR, UTE-adiabatic T1ρ, and UTE-T2* mapping were 0.794, 0.732, and 0.651, respectively. Conclusions: The quantitative UTE-MRI techniques (UTE-MT, UTE-adiabatic T1ρ, and UTE-T2* mapping) show great promise for assessing the early degeneration of articular cartilage in vivo, and the UTE-MT and UTE-adiabatic T1ρ values show better diagnostic efficacy than UTE-T2* mapping. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Background: To investigate the feasibility of quantitative ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging (UTE-MRI) techniques for assessing early cartilage degeneration in vivo. Methods: A total of 46 patients with knee pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) as the main complaint were recruited into the study. We performed MRI examinations with different quantitative UTE-MRI techniques, including UTE-based magnetization transfer (MT), UTE-adiabaticT1ρ, and UTE-T2* mapping on a 3.0T clinical magnetic resonance (MR) scanner (MR750; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA). Three regions of interest (ROIs) were manually drawn on the medial and lateral femoral condyles and the corresponding medial and lateral tibial plateaus, respectively. A total of 561 ROIs (12 ROIs for each knee) were finally included and divided into 3 groups according to the MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS): normal (MOAKS 0, n=175), mild degeneration (MOAKS 1, n=283), and moderate degeneration (MOAKS 2, n=103). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tamhane's T2 test were used to compare the differences of quantitative UTE-biomarkers among different groups. The analysis of Spearman's correlation was used to assess the correlation between the UTE-biomarkers and MOAKS grading. The diagnostic efficacy of different quantitative UTE-MRI techniques for detecting mild cartilage degeneration was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The UTE-MT ratio (UTE-MTR) and the UTE-adiabatic T1ρ values had a moderate correlation with the MOAKS grading (r=-0.523, P<0.001; r=0.531, P<0.001, respectively), while the UTE-T2* was weakly correlated with the MOAKS grading (r=-0.396, P<0.001). For the normal group (MOAKS 0) and the mild group (MOAKS 1), the UTE-MTR values were 21.09%±3.03% and 17.30%±3.22%, respectively. The UTE-adiabatic T1ρ values were 30.43±6.26 ms and 35.05±8.78 ms for the normal group (MOAKS 0) and the mild group (MOAKS 1), respectively. With respect to the UTE-T2* values, the normal group (MOAKS 0) values were 21.49±3.96 ms and the mild group (MOAKS 1) values were 19.86±3.08 ms. All the differences between the 2 groups of the 3 UTE-MRI values were significant. The AUCs of the UTE-MTR, UTE-adiabatic T1ρ, and UTE-T2* mapping were 0.794, 0.732, and 0.651, respectively. Conclusions: The quantitative UTE-MRI techniques (UTE-MT, UTE-adiabatic T1ρ, and UTE-T2* mapping) show great promise for assessing the early degeneration of articular cartilage in vivo, and the UTE-MT and UTE-adiabatic T1ρ values show better diagnostic efficacy than UTE-T2* mapping. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Entities:
Keywords:
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); cartilage degeneration; in vivo; ultrashort echo time (UTE)
Authors: Guinel H Filho; Jiang Du; Byung C Pak; Sheronda Statum; Richard Znamorowski; Parviz Haghighi; Graeme Bydder; Christine B Chung Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Eric Y Chang; Juliana C Campos; Won C Bae; Richard Znamirowski; Sheronda Statum; Jiang Du; Christine B Chung Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2015 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Ashley A Williams; Jennifer C Erhart-Hledik; Jessica L Asay; Gordhan B Mahtani; Matthew R Titchenal; Amelie M Lutz; Thomas P Andriacchi; Constance R Chu Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2021-01-28 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Chantal Pauli; Won C Bae; Michael Lee; Martin Lotz; Graeme M Bydder; Darryl L D'Lima; Christine B Chung; Jiang Du Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 11.105