Literature DB >> 24091594

The non-interventional BonViva Intravenous Versus Alendronate (VIVA) study: real-world adherence and persistence to medication, efficacy, and safety, in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

P Hadji1, D Felsenberg, M Amling, L C Hofbauer, J A Kandenwein, A Kurth.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonates in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis is suboptimal. In this study, patients were treated with either oral or intravenous bisphosphonates. The increased adherence and persistence observed in patients receiving intravenous medication compared with those receiving oral medication may improve health outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Poor adherence and persistence to oral medication are often observed in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO). The purpose of the non-interventional BonViva Intravenous Versus Alendronate (VIVA) study was to determine whether, in a real-world setting, (1) increased adherence and persistence to medication would be observed in women with PMO receiving intravenous (i.v.) ibandronate versus oral alendronate, (2) a correlation exists between adherence and persistence to medication and drug efficacy, and (3) any unexpected adverse events/serious adverse events (AEs/SAEs) may occur.
METHODS: The study was conducted in 632 centers in Germany. A total of 6,064 females with PMO were enrolled and recruited into one of two treatment arms: quarterly i.v. administration of 3 mg ibandronate or weekly oral medication of 70 mg alendronate, for 12 months. At the end of the study, adherence and persistence to medication, new osteoporotic fractures, mobility, use of analgesics, and AEs/SAEs were determined.
RESULTS: Greater adherence and persistence to medication were observed in the ibandronate treatment arm compared with the alendronate treatment arm. Although there was no significant difference in the number of patients with new vertebral, hip, or forearm fractures between treatment arms, a significantly greater increase in mobility and decrease in the use of analgesics were reported in the ibandronate treatment arm. No unexpected AEs/SAEs occurred in either arm.
CONCLUSIONS: Adherence and persistence to medication were greater in women with PMO receiving i.v. ibandronate compared with those receiving oral alendronate. This may have led to an increase in mobility and a decrease in pain in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24091594     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-013-2515-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  40 in total

1.  Persistence and compliance of medications used in the treatment of osteoporosis--analysis using a large scale, representative, longitudinal German database.

Authors:  Volker Ziller; Karel Kostev; Ioannis Kyvernitakis; Jelena Boeckhoff; Peyman Hadji
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.366

2.  The epidemiology of osteoporosis--Bone Evaluation Study (BEST): an analysis of routine health insurance data.

Authors:  Peyman Hadji; Silvia Klein; Holger Gothe; Bertram Häussler; Thomas Kless; Torsten Schmidt; Thomas Steinle; Frank Verheyen; Roland Linder
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Treatment satisfaction and persistence among postmenopausal women on osteoporosis medications: 12-month results from POSSIBLE US™.

Authors:  E Barrett-Connor; S W Wade; T P Do; S Satram-Hoang; R Stewart; G Gao; D Macarios
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Three monthly intravenous injections of ibandronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  D Thiébaud; P Burckhardt; H Kriegbaum; H Huss; H Mulder; J R Juttmann; K H Schöter
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Upper gastrointestinal and overall tolerability of alendronate once weekly in patients with osteoporosis: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  J A Eisman; R Rizzoli; J Roman-Ivorra; S Lipschitz; N Verbruggen; K A Gaines; M E Melton
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.580

6.  Early discontinuation of treatment for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Anna N A Tosteson; Margaret R Grove; Cristina S Hammond; Megan M Moncur; G Thomas Ray; Gwen M Hebert; Alice R Pressman; Bruce Ettinger
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Treatment preference for monthly oral ibandronate and weekly oral alendronate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: A randomized, crossover study (BALTO II).

Authors:  Peyman Hadji; Helmut Minne; Michael Pfeifer; Pierre Bourgeois; Patrice Fardellone; Angelo Licata; Vipul Devas; Daiva Masanauskaite; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  Efficacy and tolerability of intravenous ibandronate injections in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2-year results from the DIVA study.

Authors:  John A Eisman; Roberto Civitelli; Silvano Adami; Edward Czerwinski; Chris Recknor; Richard Prince; Jean-Yves Reginster; Mone Zaidi; Dieter Felsenberg; Claire Hughes; Nicole Mairon; Daiva Masanauskaite; David M Reid; Pierre D Delmas; Robert R Recker
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.666

9.  Patient preference for once-weekly alendronate 70 mg versus once-daily alendronate 10 mg: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover study.

Authors:  James A Simon; E Michael Lewiecki; Mary E Smith; Richard A Petruschke; Lixia Wang; Joanne J Palmisano
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.393

10.  The Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW): rationale and study design.

Authors:  F H Hooven; J D Adachi; S Adami; S Boonen; J Compston; C Cooper; P Delmas; A Diez-Perez; S Gehlbach; S L Greenspan; A LaCroix; R Lindsay; J C Netelenbos; J Pfeilschifter; C Roux; K G Saag; P Sambrook; S Silverman; E Siris; N B Watts; F A Anderson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Managing Osteoporosis in Patients on Long-Term Bisphosphonate Treatment: Report of a Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Authors:  Robert A Adler; Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan; Douglas C Bauer; Pauline M Camacho; Bart L Clarke; Gregory A Clines; Juliet E Compston; Matthew T Drake; Beatrice J Edwards; Murray J Favus; Susan L Greenspan; Ross McKinney; Robert J Pignolo; Deborah E Sellmeyer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Increased treatment persistence and its determinants in women with osteoporosis with prior fracture compared to those without fracture.

Authors:  L Jacob; M Dreher; K Kostev; P Hadji
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Evaluation of pain, quality of life, and patient satisfaction in parenterally treated patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Tuğba Özsoy-Ünübol; Gülseren Akyüz; Samaya Mirzayeva; Tuba Güler
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-02-26

4.  Factors affecting continuation of weekly teriparatide administration in rural areas.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Tsuchie; Naohisa Miyakoshi; Yuji Kasukawa; Hidekazu Abe; Norimitsu Masutani; Yoichi Shimada
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Comparative adherence to weekly oral and quarterly intravenous bisphosphonates among patients with limited heath literacy who sustained distal radius fractures.

Authors:  Young Hak Roh; Jung Ho Noh; Hyun Sik Gong; Goo Hyun Baek
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Persistence, adherence, and medication-taking behavior in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis receiving denosumab in routine practice in Germany, Austria, Greece, and Belgium: 12-month results from a European non-interventional study.

Authors:  P Hadji; N Papaioannou; E Gielen; M Feudjo Tepie; E Zhang; I Frieling; P Geusens; P Makras; H Resch; G Möller; L Kalouche-Khalil; A Fahrleitner-Pammer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Factors associated with high 24-month persistence with denosumab: results of a real-world, non-interventional study of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis in Germany, Austria, Greece, and Belgium.

Authors:  A Fahrleitner-Pammer; N Papaioannou; E Gielen; M Feudjo Tepie; C Toffis; I Frieling; P Geusens; P Makras; E Boschitsch; J Callens; A D Anastasilakis; C Niedhart; H Resch; L Kalouche-Khalil; P Hadji
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.617

8.  A prospective comparative study of intravenous alendronate and ibandronate for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Akira Horikawa; Naohisa Miyakoshi; Michio Hongo; Yuji Kasukawa; Hiroyuki Kodama; Yoichi Shimada
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Comparison of effectiveness and safety of ibandronate and minodronate combined with eldecalcitol in primary osteoporosis of women: A 1-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Mizue Tanaka; Yukio Nakamura; Soichiro Itoh; Yoshiharu Kato
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2017-01-17

10.  What are we paying for? A cost-effectiveness analysis of patented denosumab and generic alendronate for postmenopausal osteoporotic women in Australia.

Authors:  Jonathan Karnon; Ainul Shakirah Shafie; Nneka Orji; Sofoora Kawsar Usman
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2016-10-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.