CONTEXT: The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) was proposed to improve injury classification and guide surgical decision-making of thoracolumbar spinal trauma (TLST), but its impact on the care of patients has not been quantified. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Analysis of 458 patients treated for TLST trauma from 2000 through 2010 at a single center. Outcome measures Neurological status - ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS), failure of conservative treatment, and surgical complications. METHODS: Clinical and radiological data were evaluated. Patients were grouped according to the period before (2000-2006) and after (2007-2010) utilization of the TLICS. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2006, 148 patients were initially treated conservatively (C) and 66 were surgically (S) treated. In the C group, the TLICS ranged from 1 to 7 (median 1; mean 1.57). In the S group, the TLICS ranged from 2 to 10 (median 2; mean 4.14). The TLICS matched treatment in 97.9% of conservatively treated patients. From 2007 to 2010, 162 patients were initially treated C and 82 were treated S. In the C group, the TLICS ranged from 1 to 4 (median 1; mean 1.48). In the S group, the TLICS ranged from 2-10 (median 4; mean 4.4). The TLICS matched treatment in 98.8% of C-treated patients. Overall, failure of C treatment occurred in nine patients; most failures (7/9) and all three missed distractive injuries occurred prior to use of the TLICS. CONCLUSIONS: After introduction of the TLICS, there was a trend towards more successful conservative treatment with fewer conversions to surgical treatment.
CONTEXT: The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) was proposed to improve injury classification and guide surgical decision-making of thoracolumbar spinal trauma (TLST), but its impact on the care of patients has not been quantified. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Analysis of 458 patients treated for TLST trauma from 2000 through 2010 at a single center. Outcome measures Neurological status - ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS), failure of conservative treatment, and surgical complications. METHODS: Clinical and radiological data were evaluated. Patients were grouped according to the period before (2000-2006) and after (2007-2010) utilization of the TLICS. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2006, 148 patients were initially treated conservatively (C) and 66 were surgically (S) treated. In the C group, the TLICS ranged from 1 to 7 (median 1; mean 1.57). In the S group, the TLICS ranged from 2 to 10 (median 2; mean 4.14). The TLICS matched treatment in 97.9% of conservatively treated patients. From 2007 to 2010, 162 patients were initially treated C and 82 were treated S. In the C group, the TLICS ranged from 1 to 4 (median 1; mean 1.48). In the S group, the TLICS ranged from 2-10 (median 4; mean 4.4). The TLICS matched treatment in 98.8% of C-treated patients. Overall, failure of C treatment occurred in nine patients; most failures (7/9) and all three missed distractive injuries occurred prior to use of the TLICS. CONCLUSIONS: After introduction of the TLICS, there was a trend towards more successful conservative treatment with fewer conversions to surgical treatment.
Authors: Alexander R Vaccaro; Eli M Baron; James Sanfilippo; Sidney Jacoby; Jacob Steuve; Eric Grossman; Matthew DiPaola; Paul Ranier; Luke Austin; Ray Ropiak; Michael Ciminello; Chuka Okafor; Matthew Eichenbaum; Venkat Rapuri; Eric Smith; Fabio Orozco; Peter Ugolini; Mark Fletcher; Jonathan Minnich; Gregory Goldberg; Jared Wilsey; Joon Y Lee; Moe R Lim; Anthony Burns; Ralph Marino; Christian DiPaola; Laura Zeiller; Steven C Zeiler; James Harrop; D Greg Anderson; Todd J Albert; Alan S Hilibrand Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2006-05-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Alpesh A Patel; Alexander R Vaccaro; Todd J Albert; Alan S Hilibrand; James S Harrop; D Greg Anderson; Ashwani Sharan; Peter G Whang; Kornelius A Poelstra; Paul Arnold; John Dimar; Ignacio Madrazo; Sajan Hegde Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Y Raja Rampersaud; Charles Fisher; Jared Wilsey; Paul Arnold; Neel Anand; Chris M Bono; Andrew T Dailey; Marcel Dvorak; Michael G Fehlings; James S Harrop; F C Oner; Alexander R Vaccaro Journal: J Spinal Disord Tech Date: 2006-10
Authors: Jan Siebenga; Vincent J M Leferink; Michiel J M Segers; Matthijs J Elzinga; Fred C Bakker; Henk J Th M Haarman; Pol M Rommens; Henk-Jan ten Duis; Peter Patka Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2006-12-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Alexander R Vaccaro; Ronald A Lehman; R John Hurlbert; Paul A Anderson; Mitchel Harris; Rune Hedlund; James Harrop; Marcel Dvorak; Kirkham Wood; Michael G Fehlings; Charles Fisher; Steven C Zeiller; D Greg Anderson; Christopher M Bono; Gordon H Stock; Andrew K Brown; Timothy Kuklo; F C Oner Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2005-10-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: William P Waring; Fin Biering-Sorensen; Stephen Burns; William Donovan; Daniel Graves; Amitabh Jha; Linda Jones; Steven Kirshblum; Ralph Marino; M J Mulcahey; Ronald Reeves; William M Scelza; Mary Schmidt-Read; Adam Stein Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2010 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: F C Oner; L M P Ramos; R K J Simmermacher; P T D Kingma; C H Diekerhof; W J A Dhert; A J Verbout Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: K Wood; G Buttermann; G Butterman; A Mehbod; T Garvey; R Jhanjee; V Sechriest Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Andrei Fernandes Joaquim; Sérgio Augusto Rodrigues; Felipe Soares DA Silva; Otávio Turolo DA Silva; Enrico Ghizoni; Helder Tedeschi; Gregory D Schroeder; Alexander R Vaccaro; Alpesh A Patel Journal: Int J Spine Surg Date: 2018-08-15