Literature DB >> 16227897

A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status.

Alexander R Vaccaro1, Ronald A Lehman, R John Hurlbert, Paul A Anderson, Mitchel Harris, Rune Hedlund, James Harrop, Marcel Dvorak, Kirkham Wood, Michael G Fehlings, Charles Fisher, Steven C Zeiller, D Greg Anderson, Christopher M Bono, Gordon H Stock, Andrew K Brown, Timothy Kuklo, F C Oner.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A new proposed classification system for thoracolumbar (TL) spine injuries, including injury severity assessment, designed to assist in clinical management.
OBJECTIVE: To devise a practical, yet comprehensive, classification system for TL injuries that assists in clinical decision-making in terms of the need for operative versus nonoperative care and surgical treatment approach in unstable injury patterns. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The most appropriate classification of traumatic TL spine injuries remains controversial. Systems currently in use can be cumbersome and difficult to apply. None of the published classification schemata is constructed to aid with decisions in clinical management.
METHODS: Clinical spine trauma specialists from a variety of institutions around the world were canvassed with respect to information they deemed pivotal in the communication of TL spine trauma and the clinical decision-making process. Traditional injury patterns were reviewed and reconsidered in light of these essential characteristics. An initial validation process to determine the reliability and validity of an earlier version of this system was also undertaken.
RESULTS: A new classification system called the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) was devised based on three injury characteristics: 1) morphology of injury determined by radiographic appearance, 2) integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and 3) neurologic status of the patient. A composite injury severity score was calculated from these characteristics stratifying patients into surgical and nonsurgical treatment groups. Finally, a methodology was developed to determine the optimum operative approach for surgical injury patterns.
CONCLUSIONS: Although there will always be limitations to any cataloging system, the TLICS reflects accepted features cited in the literature important in predicting spinal stability, future deformity, and progressive neurologic compromise. This classification system is intended to be easy to apply and to facilitate clinical decision-making as a practical alternative to cumbersome classification systems already in use. The TLICS may improve communication between spine trauma physicians and the education of residents and fellows. Further studies are underway to determine the reliability and validity of this tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16227897     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000182986.43345.cb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  180 in total

1.  The development and evaluation of the subaxial injury classification scoring system for cervical spine trauma.

Authors:  Peter G Whang; Alpesh A Patel; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  MRI study of post-traumatic incompetence of posterior ligamentous complex: importance of the supraspinous ligament. Prospective study of 74 traumatic fractures.

Authors:  Javier Pizones; Lorenzo Zúñiga; Felisa Sánchez-Mariscal; Patricia Alvarez; Alejandro Gómez-Rice; Enrique Izquierdo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Imaging evaluation of traumatic thoracolumbar spine injuries: Radiological review.

Authors:  Shivanand Gamanagatti; Deepak Rathinam; Krithika Rangarajan; Atin Kumar; Kamran Farooque; Vijay Sharma
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-28

4.  Computed tomography of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  N Eames
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Reverse and pseudoreverse cortical sign in thoracolumbar burst fracture: radiologic description and distinction--a propos of three cases.

Authors:  Vincent Arlet; Douglas G Orndorff; Jay Jagannathan; Aaron Dumont
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  [Type B injuries of the thoracolumbar spine : misinterpretations of the integrity of the posterior ligament complex using radiologic diagnostics].

Authors:  K J Schnake; F von Scotti; N P Haas; F Kandziora
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 7.  Upper cervical injuries - a rational approach to guide surgical management.

Authors:  Andrei F Joaquim; Enrico Ghizoni; Helder Tedeschi; Brandon Lawrence; Darrel S Brodke; Alexander R Vaccaro; Alpesh A Patel
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Measuring the impact of the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score among 458 consecutively treated patients.

Authors:  Andrei F Joaquim; Brandon Lawrence; Michael Daubs; Darrel Brodke; Helder Tedeschi; Alexander R Vaccaro; Alpesh A Patel
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 9.  Relationships between the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen Spine System and the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System: an analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Andrei F Joaquim; Alpesh A Patel
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  CT for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: Can CT findings accurately predict posterior ligament complex injury?

Authors:  Bharti Khurana; Luciano M Prevedello; Christopher M Bono; Erwin Lin; Steven T McCormack; Hamdi Jimale; Mitchel B Harris; Aaron D Sodickson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.