Literature DB >> 12728024

Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological deficit. A prospective, randomized study.

K Wood1, G Buttermann, G Butterman, A Mehbod, T Garvey, R Jhanjee, V Sechriest.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, a prospective, randomized study comparing operative and nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture in patients without a neurological deficit has never been performed. Our hypothesis was that operative treatment would lead to superior long-term clinical outcomes.
METHODS: From 1994 to 1998, forty-seven consecutive patients (thirty-two men and fifteen women) with a stable thoracolumbar burst fracture and no neurological deficit were randomized to one of two treatment groups: operative (posterior or anterior arthrodesis and instrumentation) or nonoperative treatment (application of a body cast or orthosis). Radiographs and computed tomography scans were analyzed for sagittal alignment and canal compromise. All patients completed a questionnaire to assess any disability they may have had before the injury, and they indicated the degree of pain at the time of presentation with use of a visual analog scale. The average duration of follow-up was forty-four months (minimum, twenty-four months). After treatment, patients indicated the degree of pain with use of the visual analog scale and they completed the Roland and Morris disability questionnaire, the Oswestry back-pain questionnaire, and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) health survey.
RESULTS: In the operative group (twenty-four patients), the average fracture kyphosis was 10.1 degrees at the time of admission and 13 degrees at the final follow-up evaluation. The average canal compromise was 39% on admission, and it improved to 22% at the final follow-up examination. In the nonoperative group (twenty-three patients), the average kyphosis was 11.3 degrees at the time of admission and 13.8 degrees at the final follow-up examination after treatment. The average canal compromise was 34% at the time of admission and improved to 19% at the final follow-up examination. On the basis of the numbers available, no significant difference was found between the two groups with respect to return to work. The average pain scores at the time of the latest follow-up were similar for both groups. The preinjury scores were similar for both groups; however, at the time of the final follow-up, those who were treated nonoperatively reported less disability. Final scores on the SF-36 and Oswestry questionnaires were similar for the two groups, although certain trends favored those treated without surgery. Complications were more frequent in the operative group.
CONCLUSION: We found that operative treatment of patients with a stable thoracolumbar burst fracture and normal findings on the neurological examination provided no major long-term advantage compared with nonoperative treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12728024     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200305000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  119 in total

1.  Thoracolumbar spine fractures in the geriatric fracture center: early ambulation leads to good results on short term and is a successful and safe alternative compared to immobilization in elderly patients with two-column vertebral fractures.

Authors:  L B M Weerink; E C Folbert; M Kraai; R S Smit; J H Hegeman; D van der Velde
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

2.  Mid-term results of PLIF/TLIF in trauma.

Authors:  Rene Schmid; Dietmar Krappinger; Michael Blauth; Anton Kathrein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comments on "Management of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures ...".

Authors:  C Knop; M Blauth
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Principles of management of thoracolumbar fractures.

Authors:  Li-yang Dai
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.071

5.  Surgical outcome of posterior short segment trans-pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fractures.

Authors:  Shailendra Khare; Vijay Sharma
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2013-10-28

6.  The Relationship between the Progression of Kyphosis in Stable Thoracolumbar Fractures and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings.

Authors:  Deuk Soo Jun; Won Ju Shin; Byoung Keun An; Je Won Paik; Min Ho Park
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-04-15

7.  [Operative treatment of traumatic fractures of the thorax and lumbar spine. Part II: surgical treatment and radiological findings].

Authors:  M Reinhold; C Knop; R Beisse; L Audigé; F Kandziora; A Pizanis; R Pranzl; E Gercek; M Schultheiss; A Weckbach; V Bühren; M Blauth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Measuring the impact of the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score among 458 consecutively treated patients.

Authors:  Andrei F Joaquim; Brandon Lawrence; Michael Daubs; Darrel Brodke; Helder Tedeschi; Alexander R Vaccaro; Alpesh A Patel
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.985

9.  Six-year outcome of thoracoscopic ventral spondylodesis after unstable incomplete cranial burst fractures of the thoracolumbar junction: ventral versus dorso-ventral strategy.

Authors:  Ulrich Spiegl; Stefan Hauck; Patricia Merkel; Volker Bühren; Oliver Gonschorek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  [Delayed indications for additive ventral treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures : What correction loss is to be expected].

Authors:  U J A Spiegl; J-S Jarvers; C-E Heyde; S Glasmacher; N Von der Höh; C Josten
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.