Literature DB >> 24089655

Awareness and Acceptable Practices: IRB and Researcher Reflections on the Havasupai Lawsuit.

Nanibaa' A Garrison1, Mildred K Cho.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2003, Havasupai tribe members in Arizona discovered that their DNA samples, collected for genetic studies on Type II diabetes, had been used for studies on schizophrenia, migration, and inbreeding without their approval. The resulting lawsuit brought by the Havasupai reached a settlement in April 2010 in which tribe members received monetary compensation and the return of DNA samples. In this study, we examine the perceptions of Institutional Review Board (IRB) chairpersons and human genetic researchers about the case and its impact on the practice of research.
METHODS: Twenty-minute semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 Institutional Review Board (IRB) chairs and researchers at six top NIH-funded institutions. Participants were questioned about their knowledge and perceived impact of the Havasupai case and their perceptions of informed consent in genetic research studies.
RESULTS: We found that most study participants did not perceive that the Havasupai case had a large impact. However, we identified key concerns and opinions of the case, in particular, increased awareness of culturally sensitive issues with informed consent and secondary uses of samples.
CONCLUSIONS: The results provide a deeper understanding of how informed consent issues are understood by IRB members and human genetic researchers and the implications for research ethics education.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Havasupai; Informed Consent; Institutional Review Boards; Research Ethics

Year:  2013        PMID: 24089655      PMCID: PMC3786163          DOI: 10.1080/21507716.2013.770104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJOB Prim Res        ISSN: 2150-7724


  20 in total

1.  Triggers for research ethics consultation.

Authors:  Molly Havard; Mildred K Cho; David Magnus
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  The legacy of Tuskegee and trust in medical care: is Tuskegee responsible for race differences in mistrust of medical care?

Authors:  Dwayne T Brandon; Lydia A Isaac; Thomas A LaVeist
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Strangers at the benchside: research ethics consultation.

Authors:  Mildred K Cho; Sara L Tobin; Henry T Greely; Jennifer McCormick; Angie Boyce; David Magnus
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Newborn screening: a spot of trouble.

Authors:  Mary Carmichael
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Attitudes toward genetic research review: results from a survey of human genetics researchers.

Authors:  K L Edwards; A A Lemke; S B Trinidad; S M Lewis; H Starks; M T Quinn Griffin; G L Wiesner
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 6.  Burdens on research imposed by institutional review boards: the state of the evidence and its implications for regulatory reform.

Authors:  George Silberman; Katherine L Kahn
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.911

7.  Research ethics. Research practice and participant preferences: the growing gulf.

Authors:  S B Trinidad; S M Fullerton; E J Ludman; G P Jarvik; E B Larson; W Burke
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Informed consent and other ethical issues in human population genetics.

Authors:  H T Greely
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 16.830

9.  The "how" and "whys" of research: life scientists' views of accountability.

Authors:  J M Ladd; M D Lappé; J B McCormick; A M Boyce; M K Cho
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Biomedical scientists' perceptions of ethical and social implications: is there a role for research ethics consultation?

Authors:  Jennifer B McCormick; Angie M Boyce; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

1.  Enhance Diversity Among Researchers to Promote Participant Trust in Precision Medicine Research.

Authors:  Demetrio Sierra-Mercado; Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  Scientists' perspectives on consent in the context of biobanking research.

Authors:  Zubin Master; Lisa Campo-Engelstein; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Still Human: A Call for Increased Focus on Ethical Standards in Cadaver Research.

Authors:  Michelle C Bach
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2016-12

4.  Implementing Qualitative Data Management Plans to Ensure Ethical Standards in Multi-Partner Centers.

Authors:  Lisa J Hardy; Amy Hughes; Elizabeth Hulen; Anna L Schwartz
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 5.  Institutional Review Board Preparedness for Disaster Research: a Practical Approach.

Authors:  Joan P Packenham; Richard Rosselli; Alice Fothergill; Julia Slutsman; Steve Ramsey; Janet E Hall; Aubrey Miller
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2021-05-11

Review 6.  Informed Consent in the Genomics Era.

Authors:  Shannon Rego; Megan E Grove; Mildred K Cho; Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 5.159

7.  To Share or Not to Share? A Survey of Biomedical Researchers in the U.S. Southwest, an Ethnically Diverse Region.

Authors:  Mai H Oushy; Rebecca Palacios; Alan E C Holden; Amelie G Ramirez; Kipling J Gallion; Mary A O'Connell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  "It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa.

Authors:  Keymanthri Moodley; Shenuka Singh
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 9.  A framework for enhancing ethical genomic research with Indigenous communities.

Authors:  Katrina G Claw; Matthew Z Anderson; Rene L Begay; Krystal S Tsosie; Keolu Fox; Nanibaa' A Garrison
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  A Multilevel Approach to Stakeholder Engagement in the Formulation of a Clinical Data Research Network.

Authors:  Alaina P Boyer; Alecia M Fair; Yvonne A Joosten; Rowena J Dolor; Neely A Williams; Lisa Sherden; Sarah Stallings; Duane T Smoot; Consuelo H Wilkins
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.