| Literature DB >> 24089609 |
Dogan Atilgan1, Bekir S Parlaktas, Nihat Uluocak, Fikret Erdemir, Sahin Kilic, Unal Erkorkmaz, Huseyin Ozyurt, Fatma Markoc.
Abstract
Aim. We aimed to evaluate the antioxidant effects of weight loss and melatonin on the obesity-induced oxidative damage in rat testes. Materials and Methods. 28 male Wistar albino rats were randomly divided into 4 groups, each consisting of 7 rats: control group (Group 1), obesity group (Group 2), obesity + MLT group (Group 3), and weight loss group (Group 4). Rats were weighed at the beginning and at the end of the study. Bilateral orchiectomy was performed and 5 cc blood samples were obtained from all of the rats. Superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA), and protein carbonyl (PC) levels were analysed in the testicular tissues and serum. Spermatogenesis was evaluated with the Johnsen scoring system. Results. The testicular tissue and serum levels of MDA, PC, and SOD activity were increased in the obesity group in comparison to the sham operated group (P < 0.05). Weight loss and melatonin treatment ameliorated MDA, PC, and SOD levels in testicular tissue and serum significantly (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between groups in terms of mean Johnsen score (P = 0.727). Conclusion. Experimentally created obesity caused oxidative stress and both melatonin and weight loss reduced oxidative stress parameters in rat testes.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24089609 PMCID: PMC3780536 DOI: 10.1155/2013/836121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Urol ISSN: 1687-6369
Weights of rats at the beginning and at the end of study.
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | * | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (base) | 311.43 ± 2.94 | 314.29 ± 3.59 | 320 ± 3.65 | 315.71 ± 3.40 | 0.003a |
| Weight (8th week) | 323.71 ± 1.80 | 383.93 ± 5.20 | 391.43 ± 4.35 | 388.57 ± 5.03 | <0.001b |
| ** |
|
|
|
| |
| Weight differences (base to 8th week) | 12.29 ± 1.89 | 69.64 ± 6.73 | 71.43 ± 7.59 | 72.86 ± 6.01 | 0.001b |
| Weight (12th week) | — | — | — | 369.43 ± 5.56 | |
| *** | — | — | — | 0.001c |
Data were shown as mean ± standard deviation.
*P values of the comparisons among four groups.
**P values of the comparisons between base and 8th week weights separately for groups.
***P values of the comparisons among base 8th week and 12th week weights for group 4.
aThere was statistically significant difference between group 1 and group 3. However there were no statistically significant difference between other pairwise comparisons.
bThere was statistically significant difference between group 1 and other groups. However there were no statistically significant difference between other pairwise comparisons.
cThere was statistically significant difference between measures of base and 8th and 12th week. However there were no statistically significant difference between measures of 8th and 12th week.
Tissue MDA, PC levels and SOD activities.
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOD (U/mg protein) | 0.008 ± 0.002 | 0.035 ± 0.009 | 0.014 ± 0.007 | 0.014 ± 0.002 |
|
| MDA (nmol/g wet tissue) | 20.10 ± 11.69 | 42.36 ± 12.28 | 23.65 ± 6.46 | 21.05 ± 15.33 |
|
| Protein Carbonyl (nmol/mg prot) | 2.90 ± 0.70 | 4.59 ± 0.78 | 3.66 ± 0.84 | 3.55 ± 0.95 |
|
Data were shown as mean ± standard deviation and range (min–max).
aThere was statistically significant difference from group 1.
bThere was statistically significant difference from group 2.
Serum SOD, MDA, and PC levels of all groups.
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOD (U/mg protein) | 1.93 ± 1.71 | 5.72 ± 1.59 | 1.81 ± 0.18 | 1.84 ± 0.68 |
|
| MDA ( | 4.06 ± 0.58 | 8.68 ± 1.16 | 4.59 ± 1.92 | 4.73 ± 1.71 |
|
| Protein carbonyl (nmol/mL) | 1403.6 ± 397.4 | 2358.2 ± 190.1 | 1688.4 ± 204.6 | 1826.9 ± 317.7 |
|
Data were shown as mean ± standard deviation and range (min–max).
aThere was statistically significant difference from group 1.
bThere was statistically significant difference from group 2.
Johnsen Scores and the statistical analysis results.
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johnsen Score | 9.05 ± 0.37 | 8.68 ± 0.89 | 8.83 ± 0.37 | 9.1 ± 0.39 | 0.727 |
Data were shown as mean ± standard deviation and range (min–max).