| Literature DB >> 24089599 |
Evellyne de Oliveira Figueirôa1, Luís Cláudio Nascimento da Silva, Cristiane Moutinho Lagos de Melo, Juliana Kelle de Andrade Lemoine Neves, Nicácio Henrique da Silva, Valéria Rêgo Alves Pereira, Maria Tereza dos Santos Correia.
Abstract
An increasing number of biological activities presented by medicinal plants has been investigated over the years, and they are used in the search for new substances with lower side effects. Eugenia uniflora L. and Eugenia malaccensis L. (Myrtaceae) have many folk uses in various countries. This current study was designed to quantify the polyphenols and flavonoids contents and evaluate the immunomodulatory, antioxidant, and cytotoxic potentials of fractions from E. uniflora L. and E. malaccensis L. It was observed that the polyphenol content was higher in ethyl acetate fractions. These fractions have high antioxidant potential. E. malaccensis L. seeds showed the largest DPPH radical scavenger capacity (EC50 = 22.62). The fractions of E. malaccensis L. leaves showed lower antioxidant capacity. The samples did not alter the profile of proinflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide release. The results indicate that species of the family Myrtaceae are rich in compounds with antioxidant capacity, which can help reduce the inflammatory response.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24089599 PMCID: PMC3780708 DOI: 10.1155/2013/125027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Flavonoid and total phenolic content and hemolytic activity of extracts from E. uniflora and E. malaccensis.
| Extract | Total phenolic content (mgGAE/g) | Flavonoid content (mgQE/g) | Hemolysis (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| LEtOAc Fr. | 2756 ± 15.5 | 84.3 ± 3.4 | 72.73 ± 0.96 |
| Ln-BuOH Fr. | 2492 ± 58.1 | 8.6 ± 0.9 | 1.9 ± 0.72 |
| LH2O Fr. | 2445 ± 15.5 | 2.1 ± 0.07 | 0 |
| SEtOAc Fr. | 2831 ± 23.0 | 31.2 ± 1.1 | 72.23 ± 0.68 |
| Sn-BuOH Fr. | 2365 ± 38.3 | 5.6 ± 0.4 | 2.1 ± 0.74 |
| SH2O Fr. | 2351 ± 12.3 | 2.9 ± 0.4 | 0 |
|
| |||
| LEtOAc Fr. | 1641 ± 31.9 | 40.7 ± 1.5 | 100 |
| Ln-BuOH Fr. | 565 ± 32.7 | 20.7 ± 6.6 | 100 |
| LH2O Fr. | 264 ± 9.5 | 2.0 ± 0.4 | 0 |
| SEtOAc Fr. | 2920 ± 24.4 | 5.8 ± 0.3 | 100 |
| Sn-BuOH Fr. | 2341 ± 36.5 | 2.9 ± 0.9 | 100 |
| SH2O Fr. | 2256 ± 37.3 | 0 | 3.39 ± 0.82 |
Legend: (LEtOAc Fr.): ethyl acetate fraction of leaves, (Ln-BuOH Fr.): butanol fraction of leaves, (LH2O Fr.): aqueous fraction of leaves, (SEtOAc Fr.): ethyl acetate fraction of seeds, (Sn-BuOH Fr.): butanol fraction of seeds, and (SH2O Fr.): aqueous fraction of seeds. Values are means ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 1DPPH radical inhibition of different extracts from E. uniflora and E. malaccensis. (a) EtOAc Fr. (b) n-BuOH Fr. (c) H2O Fr. EC50 is the concentration needed for 50% of inhibition. The values are represented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Leaves E. uniflora (LEuni), seeds E. uniflora (SEuni), leaves E. malaccensis (LEmal), and seeds E. malaccensis (SEmal).
Cytotoxicity assay using splenocytes from BALB/c mice treated with extracts of E. uniflora and E. malaccensis.
| Extract | Concentrations ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 10 | 25 | 50 | 100 | |
|
| ||||||
| LEtOAc Fr. | − | − | − | − | + | + |
| Ln-BuOH Fr. | − | − | − | − | − | + |
| LH2O Fr. | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| SEtOAc Fr. | − | − | − | + | + | + |
| Sn-BuOH Fr. | − | − | − | − | − | + |
| SH2O Fr. | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| ||||||
| LEtOAc Fr. | − | − | − | − | + | + |
| Ln-BuOH Fr. | − | − | − | − | + | + |
| LH2O Fr. | − | − | − | − | − | + |
| SEtOAc Fr. | − | − | − | + | + | + |
| Sn-BuOH Fr. | − | − | − | − | − | + |
| SH2O Fr. | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Saponin** | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Legend: *Nontoxic concentrations were determined by 3H-thymidine incorporation. Percentages below 30% compared to the immune cells not treated (control) are considered nontoxic (−). (LEtOAc Fr.): Ethyl acetate fraction of leaves, (Ln-BuOH Fr.): butanol fraction of leaves, (LH2O Fr.): aqueous fraction of leaves, (SEtOAc Fr.): ethyl acetate fraction of seeds, (Sn-BuOH Fr.): butanol fraction of seeds, and (SH2O Fr.): aqueous fraction of seeds.
Figure 2Percentage of apoptotic cells and necrotic cells treated with extracts from E. uniflora (a) and E. malaccensis (b). Values are given as mean ± SD (n = 4). Ethyl acetate fraction of leaves (LEtOAc Fr.), butanol fraction of leaves. (Ln-BuOH Fr.), aqueous fraction of leaves (LH2O Fr.), ethyl acetate fraction of seeds (SEtOAc Fr), butanol fraction of seeds (Sn-BuOH Fr.), and aqueous fraction of seeds (SH2O Fr.).