Literature DB >> 24085144

Short-term surgical outcomes and characteristics of patients with mesh complications from pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence surgery.

Jessica Hammett1, Ann Peters, Elisa Trowbridge, Kathie Hullfish.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) can include the use of synthetic materials. Placement of synthetic materials into the vaginal wall, through either the vagina or the abdomen, includes the risk of complications such as vaginal wall extrusion or pain. There is little data regarding outcomes following treatment of mesh complications.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent excision of mesh placed for POP or SUI between 1 January 2001 and 31 October 2012 was performed at the University of Virginia. Chart abstraction queried patient demographics, clinical history, physical examination, pre- and post-excision symptoms, and operative findings. The International Continence Society (ICS) and International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) classification system was used to define the nature and location of mesh complications.
RESULTS: A total of 57 patients (26 mid-urethral slings, 23 transvaginal prolapse, 9 intraperitoneal prolapse) with the diagnosis of mesh extrusion into the vaginal wall were analyzed. Twenty-five (average 2.8 cases/year) original mesh surgeries occurred between January 2001 and January 2010 and 41 (average 20.5 cases/year) occurred after January 2010. The most common presenting patient complaints were chronic pelvic pain (55.9 %), dyspareunia (54.4 %), and vaginal discharge (30.9 %). At a 6-week post-operative visit, 57.3 % of patient's symptoms were completely resolved and 14.6 % were improved.
CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be cognizant of the variable presentations of post-operative vaginal mesh complications. Mesh excision by experienced pelvic surgeons is an effective and safe treatment for these complications; however, a significant number of patients may have persistent symptoms following surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24085144     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-013-2227-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  14 in total

1.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related to native tissue female pelvic floor surgery.

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Robert M Freeman; Joseph Lee; Steven E Swift; Michel Cosson; Jan Deprest; Peter L Dwyer; Brigitte Fatton; Ervin Kocjancic; Chris Maher; Eckhard Petri; Diaa E Rizk; Gabriel N Schaer; Ralph Webb
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Vaginal mesh contraction: definition, clinical presentation, and management.

Authors:  Benjamin Feiner; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Early experience with mesh excision for adverse outcomes after transvaginal mesh placement using prolapse kits.

Authors:  Beri Ridgeway; Mark D Walters; Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Matthew D Barber; Sarah E McAchran; Howard B Goldman; J Eric Jelovsek
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  The IUGA/ICS classification of complications of prosthesis and graft insertion: a comparative experience in incontinence and prolapse surgery.

Authors:  C Skala; K Renezeder; S Albrich; A Puhl; R M Laterza; G Naumann; H Koelbl
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Complications of vaginal mesh surgery.

Authors:  Christopher J Chermansky; J Christian Winters
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.309

6.  One-year objective and functional outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of vaginal mesh for prolapse.

Authors:  Andrew I Sokol; Cheryl B Iglesia; Bela I Kudish; Robert E Gutman; David Shveiky; Richard Bercik; Eric R Sokol
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors.

Authors:  E C Samuelsson; F T Victor; G Tibblin; K F Svärdsudd
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Trends in use of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Michele Jonsson Funk; Autumn L Edenfield; Virginia Pate; Anthony G Visco; Alison C Weidner; Jennifer M Wu
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Surgical excision of eroded mesh after prior abdominal sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Mary M T South; Raymond T Foster; George D Webster; Alison C Weidner; Cindy L Amundsen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Complications requiring reoperation following vaginal mesh kit procedures for prolapse.

Authors:  Rebecca U Margulies; Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; Dee E Fenner; Edward J McGuire; J Quentin Clemens; John O L Delancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  13 in total

1.  Clinical application of IUGA/ICS classification system for mesh erosion.

Authors:  Rebecca Posthuma Batalden; Milena M Weinstein; Caroline Foust-Wright; Marianna Alperin; May M Wakamatsu; Samantha J Pulliam
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  Vaginal native tissue repair versus transvaginal mesh repair for apical prolapse: how utilizing different methods of analysis affects the estimated trade-off between reoperation for mesh exposure/erosion and reoperation for recurrent prolapse.

Authors:  Alexis A Dieter; Marcella G Willis-Gray; Alison C Weidner; Anthony G Visco; Evan R Myers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Heterogeneity in post-intervention prolapse and urinary outcome reporting: a one-year review of the International Urogynecology Journal.

Authors:  Dobrochna Globerman; Magali Robert
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Functional outcomes of synthetic tape and mesh revision surgeries: a monocentric experience.

Authors:  Salima Ismail; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Christine Reus; Jérémy Cohen; Thomas Seisen; Véronique Phé
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  An international Urogynecological association (IUGA)/international continence society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for the assessment of sexual health of women with pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  Rebecca G Rogers; Rachel N Pauls; Ranee Thakar; Melanie Morin; Annette Kuhn; Eckhard Petri; Brigitte Fatton; Kristene Whitmore; Sheryl A Kingsberg; Joseph Lee
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Complications and re-operations after tension-free vaginal tape operation in women with stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Nikoline Buus Søgaard; Karin Glavind
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Joint position statement on the management of mesh-related complications for the FPMRS specialist.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 8.  Assessing the use of the IUGA/ICS classification system for prosthesis/graft complications in publications from 2011 to 2015.

Authors:  Emily English; Megan Solomon; Bertha Chen; Lisa Rogo-Gupta
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  T regulatory cells and TGF-β1: Predictors of the host response in mesh complications.

Authors:  Amanda M Artsen; Rui Liang; Leslie Meyn; Matthew Rytel; Stacy Palcsey; Steven D Abramowitch; Pamela A Moalli
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  Short term complications in mesh augmented vaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse are not higher when compared with native tissue repair.

Authors:  Sarah Kanji; Dante Pascali; Aisling A Clancy
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 1.932

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.