INTRODUCTION: Malnutrition adversely affects clinical outcome of hospitalized patients. This observational prospective study was done to assess the prevalence of malnutrition and its grade among patients admitted in a mixed intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care hospital in order to help devise a comprehensive nutrition program for the malnourished. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 500 sequential patients admitted to the ICU were screened on admission over a year period for malnutrition using the Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment (SGNA) score. Distribution of the degree of malnutrition according to co-morbidities was also documented. RESULTS: Of the total, 198 (39.6%) patients were malnourished, including one patient qualifying as severely malnourished; 68% patients were male, however, there was no statistically significant difference between nutrition status between sexes. Hypertension, diabetes, and cancer were the three most commonly encountered co-morbidities among the malnourished. A total of 86% of all cancer patients admitted were malnourished against only 12% of trauma patients. CONCLUSION: This study showed that almost two-fifth of the patients admitted were malnourished in this tertiary care hospital and that there is an urgent need to develop a comprehensive nutritional care program in many such Indian ICUs.
INTRODUCTION:Malnutrition adversely affects clinical outcome of hospitalized patients. This observational prospective study was done to assess the prevalence of malnutrition and its grade among patients admitted in a mixed intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care hospital in order to help devise a comprehensive nutrition program for the malnourished. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 500 sequential patients admitted to the ICU were screened on admission over a year period for malnutrition using the Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment (SGNA) score. Distribution of the degree of malnutrition according to co-morbidities was also documented. RESULTS: Of the total, 198 (39.6%) patients were malnourished, including one patient qualifying as severely malnourished; 68% patients were male, however, there was no statistically significant difference between nutrition status between sexes. Hypertension, diabetes, and cancer were the three most commonly encountered co-morbidities among the malnourished. A total of 86% of all cancerpatients admitted were malnourished against only 12% of traumapatients. CONCLUSION: This study showed that almost two-fifth of the patients admitted were malnourished in this tertiary care hospital and that there is an urgent need to develop a comprehensive nutritional care program in many such Indian ICUs.
Entities:
Keywords:
Indian intensive care unit; malnutrition; subjective global nutritional assessment
Advancement in the field of medicine has increased the chances of survival of patients with a variety of diseases that were considered incurable earlier. This possibility also has greatly increased the number of patients seeking admission to the intensive care units (ICUs) of the hospitals. The prevalence of malnutrition is high in ICU patients. Patients being treated in ICU are considered as malnourished when their endogenous and exogenous supply of calories is not sufficient to meet their metabolic requirement. The prevalence of malnutrition has been estimated to be as high as 50% among acutely hospitalized adults, depending on the definition employed and the population assessed.[123] Malnutrition is consistently associated with adverse clinical outcomes, including increased morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay as well as reduced quality of life.[45]Various diseases commonly found in ICU patients cause stress on the body and bring about changes in substrate metabolism, thus leading to the deficiency of various nutrients. The incidence of malnutrition is significant in critical particularly in high-risk patients.[6] It is essential to identify malnourished patients and also patients at increased risk of malnutrition in order to devise a comprehensive nutrition care program. Nutrition societies across the world recommend nutrition screening tools to assess malnutrition in hospitalized patients, such as the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNS) tool.[7]The present study assessed the prevalence of malnutrition in patients hospitalized in ICU as the first step in devising a comprehensive nutritional care program.
Materials and Methods
Throughout the year, a sequential sample of 500 patients regardless of gender, ethnicity, or reason for hospitalization, who were admitted to a mixed ICU of a tertiary care hospital were included in the study. As part of routine screening, patients were screened for nutrition status by Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment (SGNA) score. On the basis of the features of history and physical examination, investigator identified an SGA rank, which indicated the patient's nutritional status. These categories included rating from 1 to 7 (well nourished = 6 or 7, mean continuous improvement; moderately malnourished = 3, 4, or 5, means no clear sign of normal status; and severely malnourished = 1 or 2, means significant physical sign of malnutrition).[8]The SGNA score was calculated based on the medical history and physical examination of individual patient. The history was focused on 5 variables, namely, weight change/loss in previous 6 months and 2 weeks, change in dietary intake, presence of gastrointestinal symptoms, and change in functional capacity and co-morbidity, while physical examination was focused on decreased fat store/loss of subcutaneous fat and signs of muscle wasting.
Anthropometric measurements
The following parameters data were captured: Height, weight, and body mass index.
Clinical evaluation
Patients were evaluated for obvious signs and symptoms of malnutrition.
Statistical methods
Simple statistical principles of average and mean were employed in this study. A sample of 500 was considered sufficient to estimate the prevalence of malnutrition status and devise a comprehensive nutrition program at the hospital.
Results
The distribution of 500 ICU admitted patients according to nutritional status and age is presented in Table 1. The mean age of the population between male and female population were similar. There was only one severely malnourished male patient of age 45 years in the study. In the study, mean age of females was 60.03 (±12.18) years and that of males was 58.64 (±16.08) years.
Table 1
Distribution of ICU patients according to nutrition status and age
Distribution of ICU patients according to nutrition status and ageThe distribution of 500 ICU admitted patients according to nutritional status and gender is presented in Table 2. Around two-thirds of the patient population (68%) was males. Overall, nourishment status was similar between males and females in the present study.
Table 2
Distribution of ICU patients according to nutrition status and sex
Distribution of ICU patients according to nutrition status and sexTable 3 summarizes the results of SGNA according to nutrition status and co-morbidity. The moderately nourished patients ranged from 15% (trauma) to 86% (cancer) and well-nourished patients ranged from 12% (cancer) to 85% (trauma) among various co-morbidities. Hypertension was the most widely seen co-morbidity among the study patients (N = 140). About equal number of hypertensivepatients were distributed according to SGNA scoring (52% well-nourished and 48% moderately malnourished). Malnourishment was highest among cancerpatients; 86% of these patients were moderately malnourished and 2% were severely malnourished). The SGNA scoring was similar for patients with co-morbidities such as hypothyroid, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and chronic liver disease (CLD).
Table 3
Distribution of ICU patients according to overall nutrition status and co-morbidity
Distribution of ICU patients according to overall nutrition status and co-morbidityTable 4 summarizes the results of SGNA according to sex, nutrition status, and co-morbidity. No gender specific pattern in the distribution of malnutrition among various co-morbidities was seen in the study, except that most traumapatients were males. All male patients (100%) with CLD were moderately malnourished (N = 7). Around 77% male cancerpatients were moderately malnourished and 21% female cancerpatients were moderately malnourished, while equal numbers of male and female patients (50%) were well nourished. The only patient who was severely malnourished was a male cancerpatient.
Table 4
Distribution of ICU patients according to gender, nutrition status and co-morbidity
Distribution of ICU patients according to gender, nutrition status and co-morbidityFigures 1 and 2 show SGNA status of ICU admitted well-nourished and moderately nourished patients. Most (85%) of the traumapatients were well nourished. Most (86%) of the cancerpatients were moderately malnourished.
Figure 1
ICU admitted co-morbid patients according to SGNA status (well nourished)
Figure 2
ICU admitted co-morbid patients according to SGNA status (moderately malnourished)
ICU admitted co-morbid patients according to SGNA status (well nourished)ICU admitted co-morbid patients according to SGNA status (moderately malnourished)
Discussion
The present single-center screen of nutrition status among hospitalized patients in ICU estimated malnutrition risk. In our study, male patients outnumbered females in ICU admissions. Among the co-morbidities, malnutrition risk was highest among cancerpatients, followed by CKD, CLD, and hypothyroidism. Various studies have estimated that about 30-50% of critically illpatients have clinical evidence of malnutrition.[9101112] These studies have also reported that the nourishment status of ICU patients generally deteriorates during the stay at the hospital, possibly due to inadequate nutritional supplementation.Our results are consistent with previous reports. In the study by Morais et al., patients were around 60 years old, with non-significant differences regarding gender and surgical/trauma category vs. medical cases.[13] In our study, older patients were more malnourished than younger patients and gender was not an influential factor among malnourished patients.Malnutrition among hospitalized adults is a global problem.[14] In addition to its devastating effects on patients, malnutrition impacts significantly on the healthcare system. Malnourished patients have higher complication rates (including infections and organ failure), slower recovery, and higher rates of psychosocial difficulties. The present survey quantifies the problem of malnutrition in hospitalized ICU patients in this part of the world and represents the first step toward developing a comprehensive nutrition care plan.
Conclusion
It is extremely important to identify at-risk population and institute early nutritional intervention to prevent its devastating effects on the patients and the possible impact on healthcare system. Our study quantified the problem of malnutrition in hospitalized patients in the ICU.In our study, about 40% of ICU patients are malnourished. The comorbid conditions identified as at-risk included cancer, CLD, COPD, and CKD. Considering that the nourishment status of hospitalized patients generally deteriorates during the stay at the hospital, possibly due to inadequate nutritional supplementation, this prevalence is substantial. There is an urgent need to develop a comprehensive nutrition care plan.
Authors: E Cereda; L Lucchin; C Pedrolli; A D'Amicis; M G Gentile; N C Battistini; M A Fusco; A Palmo; M Muscaritoli Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-05-26 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Alvaro A C Morais; Joel Faintuch; Eliana B Caser; Daniel S Costa; Bruno A Pazolini; Ary C Oliveira Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2011-03-03 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: A S Detsky; J R McLaughlin; J P Baker; N Johnston; S Whittaker; R A Mendelson; K N Jeejeebhoy Journal: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr Date: 1987 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: J Edington; J Boorman; E R Durrant; A Perkins; C V Giffin; R James; J M Thomson; J C Oldroyd; J C Smith; A D Torrance; V Blackshaw; S Green; C J Hill; C Berry; C McKenzie; N Vicca; J E Ward; S J Coles Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Reinhard Imoberdorf; Remy Meier; Peter Krebs; Paul J Hangartner; Bernhard Hess; Max Stäubli; Daniel Wegmann; Maya Rühlin; Peter E Ballmer Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2009-07-01 Impact factor: 7.324