OBJECTIVES: To evaluate diffusion-weighted MRI with acquisition of three b-values and calculation of fractioned ADCs for response evaluation of neuroendocrine liver metastases undergoing selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT). METHODS: Ten consecutive patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases underwent MRI before and following SIRT. Diffusion-weighted imaging included acquisition of the b-values 0, 50 and 800 s/mm(2) and calculation of ADC(50,800), ADC(0,50) and ADC(0,800) maps. According to therapy response, lesions were categorised into group A [≥20% reduction of the longest diameter (LD) in comparison to baseline MRI] and group B (<20% reduction of the LD). RESULTS: Twelve out of 31 metastases were categorised as group A and 19 out of 31 metastases were categorised as group B. Pretherapeutic values of ADC(0,800) and ADC(50,800) did not differ significantly between the two groups; however, ADC(0,50) was 32% lower in group A (P = 0.049). ADC(0,800) and ADC(50,800) increased significantly after therapy in both groups, however, group differences were not statistically significant. Conversely, the increase in ADC(0,50) was about a factor of 7 larger in group A than in group B (P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the ADC(0,50) is a promising biomarker for response assessment of neuroendocrine liver metastases following SIRT. KEY POINTS: • Diffusion-weighted MRI offers new information about neuroendocrine hepatic metastases. • Evaluation of perfusion and diffusion components requires fractioned apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs). • Perfusion effects represented by ADC (0.50) can be observed in neuroendocrine metastases. • Pretherapeutic ADC (0.50) was significantly lower in metastases with a response ≥20%. • Such biomarkers may help evaluate liver metastases in patients undergoing therapy.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate diffusion-weighted MRI with acquisition of three b-values and calculation of fractioned ADCs for response evaluation of neuroendocrine liver metastases undergoing selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT). METHODS: Ten consecutive patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases underwent MRI before and following SIRT. Diffusion-weighted imaging included acquisition of the b-values 0, 50 and 800 s/mm(2) and calculation of ADC(50,800), ADC(0,50) and ADC(0,800) maps. According to therapy response, lesions were categorised into group A [≥20% reduction of the longest diameter (LD) in comparison to baseline MRI] and group B (<20% reduction of the LD). RESULTS: Twelve out of 31 metastases were categorised as group A and 19 out of 31 metastases were categorised as group B. Pretherapeutic values of ADC(0,800) and ADC(50,800) did not differ significantly between the two groups; however, ADC(0,50) was 32% lower in group A (P = 0.049). ADC(0,800) and ADC(50,800) increased significantly after therapy in both groups, however, group differences were not statistically significant. Conversely, the increase in ADC(0,50) was about a factor of 7 larger in group A than in group B (P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the ADC(0,50) is a promising biomarker for response assessment of neuroendocrine liver metastases following SIRT. KEY POINTS: • Diffusion-weighted MRI offers new information about neuroendocrine hepatic metastases. • Evaluation of perfusion and diffusion components requires fractioned apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs). • Perfusion effects represented by ADC (0.50) can be observed in neuroendocrine metastases. • Pretherapeutic ADC (0.50) was significantly lower in metastases with a response ≥20%. • Such biomarkers may help evaluate liver metastases in patients undergoing therapy.
Authors: Eleni Liapi; Jean-Francois Geschwind; Josephina A Vossen; Manon Buijs; Christos S Georgiades; David A Bluemke; Ihab R Kamel Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Terence P F Gade; Ian M Buchanan; Matthew W Motley; Yousef Mazaheri; William M Spees; Jason A Koutcher Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-01-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Frederic Carsten Schmeel; Birgit Simon; Julian Alexander Luetkens; Frank Träber; Carsten Meyer; Leonard Christopher Schmeel; Amir Sabet; Samer Ezziddin; Hans Heinz Schild; Dariusch Reza Hadizadeh Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2017-03-19 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Lei Tang; Yi Sui; Zheng Zhong; Frederick C Damen; Jian Li; Lin Shen; Yingshi Sun; Xiaohong Joe Zhou Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-06-22 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Vincent Vandecaveye; Raphaëla C Dresen; Elin Pauwels; Sofie Van Binnebeek; Ragna Vanslembrouck; Kristof Baete; Felix M Mottaghy; Paul M Clement; Kristiaan Nackaerts; Eric Van Cutsem; Chris Verslype; Frederik De Keyzer; Christophe M Deroose Journal: Radiol Imaging Cancer Date: 2022-05
Authors: Claus C Pieper; Alois M Sprinkart; Carsten Meyer; Roy König; Hans H Schild; Guido M Kukuk; Petra Mürtz Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 1.889