Lei Tang1,2, Yi Sui2,3, Zheng Zhong2,3, Frederick C Damen2,4, Jian Li5, Lin Shen5, Yingshi Sun1, Xiaohong Joe Zhou2,3,4,6. 1. Department of Radiology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Beijing, China. 2. Center for MR Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 3. Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 5. Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Beijing, China. 6. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To demonstrate the clinical value of a non-Gaussian diffusion model using fractional order calculus (FROC) for early prediction of the response of gastrointestinal stromal tumor to second-line sunitinib targeted therapy. METHODS: Fifteen patients underwent sunitinib treatment after imatinib resistance. Diffusion-weighted imaging with multiple b-values was performed before treatment (baseline) and 2 weeks (for early prediction of response) after initiating sunitinib treatment. Conventional MRI images at 12 weeks were used to determine the good and poor responders according to the modified Choi criteria for MRI. Diffusion coefficient D, fractional order parameter β (which correlates to intravoxel tissue heterogeneity), and a microstructural quantity µ were calculated using the FROC model. The FROC parameters and the longest diameter of the lesion, as well as their changes after 2 weeks of treatment, were compared between the good and poor responders. Additionally, the pretreatment FROC parameters were individually combined with the change in D (ΔD) using a logistic regression model to evaluate response to sunitinib treatment with a receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Forty-two good-responding and 32 poor-responding lesions were identified. Significant differences were detected in pretreatment β (0.67 versus 0.74, P = 0.011) and ΔD (45.7% versus 12.4%, P = 0.001) between the two groups. The receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that ΔD had a significantly higher predictive power than the tumor size change (area under the curve: 0.725 versus 0.580; 0.95 confidence interval). When ΔD was combined with pretreatment β, the area under the curve improved to 0.843 with a predictive accuracy of 75.7% (56 of 74). CONCLUSIONS: The non-Gaussian FROC diffusion model showed clinical value in early prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumor response to second-line sunitinib targeted therapy. The pretreatment FROC parameter β can increase the predictive accuracy when combined with the change in diffusion coefficient during treatment. Magn Reson Med 79:1399-1406, 2018.
PURPOSE: To demonstrate the clinical value of a non-Gaussian diffusion model using fractional order calculus (FROC) for early prediction of the response of gastrointestinal stromal tumor to second-line sunitinib targeted therapy. METHODS: Fifteen patients underwent sunitinib treatment after imatinib resistance. Diffusion-weighted imaging with multiple b-values was performed before treatment (baseline) and 2 weeks (for early prediction of response) after initiating sunitinib treatment. Conventional MRI images at 12 weeks were used to determine the good and poor responders according to the modified Choi criteria for MRI. Diffusion coefficient D, fractional order parameter β (which correlates to intravoxel tissue heterogeneity), and a microstructural quantity µ were calculated using the FROC model. The FROC parameters and the longest diameter of the lesion, as well as their changes after 2 weeks of treatment, were compared between the good and poor responders. Additionally, the pretreatment FROC parameters were individually combined with the change in D (ΔD) using a logistic regression model to evaluate response to sunitinib treatment with a receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Forty-two good-responding and 32 poor-responding lesions were identified. Significant differences were detected in pretreatment β (0.67 versus 0.74, P = 0.011) and ΔD (45.7% versus 12.4%, P = 0.001) between the two groups. The receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that ΔD had a significantly higher predictive power than the tumor size change (area under the curve: 0.725 versus 0.580; 0.95 confidence interval). When ΔD was combined with pretreatment β, the area under the curve improved to 0.843 with a predictive accuracy of 75.7% (56 of 74). CONCLUSIONS: The non-Gaussian FROC diffusion model showed clinical value in early prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumor response to second-line sunitinib targeted therapy. The pretreatment FROC parameter β can increase the predictive accuracy when combined with the change in diffusion coefficient during treatment. Magn Reson Med 79:1399-1406, 2018.
Authors: Kevin M Bennett; Kathleen M Schmainda; Raoqiong Tong Bennett; Daniel B Rowe; Hanbing Lu; James S Hyde Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Chun Sing Wong; Nanjie Gong; Yiu-Ching Chu; Marina-Portia Anthony; Queenie Chan; Ho Fun Lee; Kent Man Chu; Pek-Lan Khong Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Zheng Zhong; Douglas Merkitch; M Muge Karaman; Jiaxuan Zhang; Yi Sui; Jennifer G Goldman; Xiaohong Joe Zhou Journal: Radiology Date: 2019-02-19 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jiaxuan Zhang; Terri E Weaver; Zheng Zhong; Robyn A Nisi; Kelly R Martin; Alana D Steffen; M Muge Karaman; Xiaohong Joe Zhou Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2018-09-29 Impact factor: 3.492