Frederic Carsten Schmeel1, Birgit Simon2, Julian Alexander Luetkens2, Frank Träber2, Carsten Meyer2, Leonard Christopher Schmeel2, Amir Sabet3,4, Samer Ezziddin3,4, Hans Heinz Schild2, Dariusch Reza Hadizadeh2. 1. Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische-Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany. Carsten.Schmeel@ukb.uni-bonn.de. 2. Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische-Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany. 3. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Rheinische-Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Saarland, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical potential of pretreatment apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) for therapy response and outcome prediction in patients with liver-predominant metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) undergoing radioembolization with 90Yttrium-microspheres (90Y-RE). METHODS: Forty-six consecutive patients with unresectable CRC liver metastases underwent standardized clinical DWI on a 1.5 T MR scanner prior to and 4-6 weeks after 90Y-RE. Pretreatment clinical parameters, ADC values derived from region-of-interest analysis, and the corresponding tumor sizes of three treated liver metastases per subject were recorded. Long-term tumor response to radioembolization was categorized into response (partial remission) and nonresponse (stable disease, progressive disease) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 (RECIST) 3 months after treatment. Associations between long-term tumor response and the clinical and imaging parameters were evaluated. The impact of pretreatment clinical and imaging parameters on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was further assessed by Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox-regression analyses. RESULTS: Nonresponders had higher hepatic tumor burden (p = 0.021) and lower ADC values than patients responding to 90Y-RE, both pretreatment (986 ± 215 vs. 1162 ± 178; p = 0.036) and posttreatment (1180 ± 350 vs. 1598 ± 225; p = 0.002). ADC values higher than 935 × 10-6 mm2 (5 vs. 3 months; p = 0.022) and hepatic tumor burden ≤25% (6 vs. 3 months; p = 0.014) were associated with longer median PFS, whereas ADC >935 × 10-6 mm2 (14 vs. 6 months; p = 0.02), hepatic tumor burden ≤25% (14 vs. 6 months; p = 0.048), size of the largest metastasis <4.7 cm (18 vs. 7 months; p = 0.024), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score <1 (8 vs. 5 months; p = 0.045) were associated with longer median OS. On multivariate analysis, ADC >935 × 10-6 mm2 and hepatic tumor burden ≤25% remained prognostic factors for PFS, and ADC >935 × 10-6 mm2 and size of the largest metastasis <4.7 cm were independent predictors of OS. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment ADC on DWI represents a valuable prognostic biomarker for predicting both the therapeutic efficacy and survival prognosis in CRC liver metastases treated by 90Y-RE, allowing risk stratification and potentially optimizing further treatment strategies.
PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical potential of pretreatment apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) for therapy response and outcome prediction in patients with liver-predominant metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) undergoing radioembolization with 90Yttrium-microspheres (90Y-RE). METHODS: Forty-six consecutive patients with unresectable CRC liver metastases underwent standardized clinical DWI on a 1.5 T MR scanner prior to and 4-6 weeks after 90Y-RE. Pretreatment clinical parameters, ADC values derived from region-of-interest analysis, and the corresponding tumor sizes of three treated liver metastases per subject were recorded. Long-term tumor response to radioembolization was categorized into response (partial remission) and nonresponse (stable disease, progressive disease) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 (RECIST) 3 months after treatment. Associations between long-term tumor response and the clinical and imaging parameters were evaluated. The impact of pretreatment clinical and imaging parameters on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was further assessed by Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox-regression analyses. RESULTS: Nonresponders had higher hepatic tumor burden (p = 0.021) and lower ADC values than patients responding to 90Y-RE, both pretreatment (986 ± 215 vs. 1162 ± 178; p = 0.036) and posttreatment (1180 ± 350 vs. 1598 ± 225; p = 0.002). ADC values higher than 935 × 10-6 mm2 (5 vs. 3 months; p = 0.022) and hepatic tumor burden ≤25% (6 vs. 3 months; p = 0.014) were associated with longer median PFS, whereas ADC >935 × 10-6 mm2 (14 vs. 6 months; p = 0.02), hepatic tumor burden ≤25% (14 vs. 6 months; p = 0.048), size of the largest metastasis <4.7 cm (18 vs. 7 months; p = 0.024), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score <1 (8 vs. 5 months; p = 0.045) were associated with longer median OS. On multivariate analysis, ADC >935 × 10-6 mm2 and hepatic tumor burden ≤25% remained prognostic factors for PFS, and ADC >935 × 10-6 mm2 and size of the largest metastasis <4.7 cm were independent predictors of OS. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment ADC on DWI represents a valuable prognostic biomarker for predicting both the therapeutic efficacy and survival prognosis in CRC liver metastases treated by 90Y-RE, allowing risk stratification and potentially optimizing further treatment strategies.
Authors: T F Jakobs; K J Paprottka; F Raeßler; F Strobl; S Lehner; H Ilhan; C G Trumm; W P Fendler; W Sommer; P M Paprottka Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-04-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Andrea M Abbott; Richard Kim; Sarah E Hoffe; Bulent Arslan; Ben Biebel; Junsung Choi; Ghassan El-Haddad; Bela Kis; Jennifer Sweeney; Kenneth L Meredith; Khaldoun Almhanna; Jonathan Strosberg; David Shibata; William J Fulp; Ravi Shridhar Journal: Clin Colorectal Cancer Date: 2015-02-16 Impact factor: 4.481
Authors: M A D Vente; M Wondergem; I van der Tweel; M A A J van den Bosch; B A Zonnenberg; M G E H Lam; A D van Het Schip; J F W Nijsen Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-11-07 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Ricarda Rühl; Max Seidensticker; Nils Peters; Konrad Mohnike; Jan Bornschein; Kerstin Schütte; Holger Amthauer; Peter Malfertheiner; Maciej Pech; Jens Ricke Journal: Dig Dis Date: 2009-06-22 Impact factor: 2.404
Authors: Linda Heijmen; Edwin E G W ter Voert; Wim J G Oyen; Cornelis J A Punt; Dick Johan van Spronsen; Arend Heerschap; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 3.240