Literature DB >> 28317063

Prognostic value of pretreatment diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for outcome prediction of colorectal cancer liver metastases undergoing 90Y-microsphere radioembolization.

Frederic Carsten Schmeel1, Birgit Simon2, Julian Alexander Luetkens2, Frank Träber2, Carsten Meyer2, Leonard Christopher Schmeel2, Amir Sabet3,4, Samer Ezziddin3,4, Hans Heinz Schild2, Dariusch Reza Hadizadeh2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical potential of pretreatment apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) for therapy response and outcome prediction in patients with liver-predominant metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) undergoing radioembolization with 90Yttrium-microspheres (90Y-RE).
METHODS: Forty-six consecutive patients with unresectable CRC liver metastases underwent standardized clinical DWI on a 1.5 T MR scanner prior to and 4-6 weeks after 90Y-RE. Pretreatment clinical parameters, ADC values derived from region-of-interest analysis, and the corresponding tumor sizes of three treated liver metastases per subject were recorded. Long-term tumor response to radioembolization was categorized into response (partial remission) and nonresponse (stable disease, progressive disease) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 (RECIST) 3 months after treatment. Associations between long-term tumor response and the clinical and imaging parameters were evaluated. The impact of pretreatment clinical and imaging parameters on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was further assessed by Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox-regression analyses.
RESULTS: Nonresponders had higher hepatic tumor burden (p = 0.021) and lower ADC values than patients responding to 90Y-RE, both pretreatment (986 ± 215 vs. 1162 ± 178; p = 0.036) and posttreatment (1180 ± 350 vs. 1598 ± 225; p = 0.002). ADC values higher than 935 × 10-6 mm2 (5 vs. 3 months; p = 0.022) and hepatic tumor burden ≤25% (6 vs. 3 months; p = 0.014) were associated with longer median PFS, whereas ADC >935 × 10-6 mm2 (14 vs. 6 months; p = 0.02), hepatic tumor burden ≤25% (14 vs. 6 months; p = 0.048), size of the largest metastasis <4.7 cm (18 vs. 7 months; p = 0.024), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score <1 (8 vs. 5 months; p = 0.045) were associated with longer median OS. On multivariate analysis, ADC >935 × 10-6 mm2 and hepatic tumor burden ≤25% remained prognostic factors for PFS, and ADC >935 × 10-6 mm2 and size of the largest metastasis <4.7 cm were independent predictors of OS.
CONCLUSION: Pretreatment ADC on DWI represents a valuable prognostic biomarker for predicting both the therapeutic efficacy and survival prognosis in CRC liver metastases treated by 90Y-RE, allowing risk stratification and potentially optimizing further treatment strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apparent diffusion coefficient; Colorectal cancer; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Interventional oncology; MRI; Radioembolization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28317063     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-017-2395-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  36 in total

1.  Treatment response evaluation using the mean apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Cem Onal; Gurcan Erbay; Ozan C Guler
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Robust evidence for long-term survival with 90Y radioembolization in chemorefractory liver-predominant metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  T F Jakobs; K J Paprottka; F Raeßler; F Strobl; S Lehner; H Ilhan; C G Trumm; W P Fendler; W Sommer; P M Paprottka
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and its application to cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Charles-Edwards; Nandita M deSouza
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 3.909

4.  Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging.

Authors:  D Le Bihan; E Breton; D Lallemand; M L Aubin; J Vignaud; M Laval-Jeantet
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Role of diffusion-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient and correlation with hepatobiliary phase findings in the differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma from dysplastic nodules in cirrhotic liver.

Authors:  Riccardo Inchingolo; Anna Maria De Gaetano; Davide Curione; Marzia Ciresa; Luca Miele; Maurizio Pompili; Fabio Maria Vecchio; Felice Giuliante; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Pattern of tumour growth of the primary colon cancer predicts long-term outcome after resection of liver metastases.

Authors:  Lidewij Spelt; Agata Sasor; Daniel Ansari; Roland Andersson
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Outcomes of Therasphere Radioembolization for Colorectal Metastases.

Authors:  Andrea M Abbott; Richard Kim; Sarah E Hoffe; Bulent Arslan; Ben Biebel; Junsung Choi; Ghassan El-Haddad; Bela Kis; Jennifer Sweeney; Kenneth L Meredith; Khaldoun Almhanna; Jonathan Strosberg; David Shibata; William J Fulp; Ravi Shridhar
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 4.481

8.  Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization for the treatment of liver malignancies: a structured meta-analysis.

Authors:  M A D Vente; M Wondergem; I van der Tweel; M A A J van den Bosch; B A Zonnenberg; M G E H Lam; A D van Het Schip; J F W Nijsen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Hepatocellular carcinoma and liver cirrhosis: assessment of the liver function after Yttrium-90 radioembolization with resin microspheres or after CT-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Ricarda Rühl; Max Seidensticker; Nils Peters; Konrad Mohnike; Jan Bornschein; Kerstin Schütte; Holger Amthauer; Peter Malfertheiner; Maciej Pech; Jens Ricke
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 2.404

10.  Multimodality imaging to predict response to systemic treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Linda Heijmen; Edwin E G W ter Voert; Wim J G Oyen; Cornelis J A Punt; Dick Johan van Spronsen; Arend Heerschap; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Baseline 3D-ADC outperforms 2D-ADC in predicting response to treatment in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Daniel Fadaei Fouladi; Manijeh Zarghampour; Pallavi Pandey; Ankur Pandey; Farnaz Najmi Varzaneh; Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh; Pegah Khoshpouri; Ihab R Kamel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Quantitative diffusion MRI of the abdomen and pelvis.

Authors:  Diego Hernando; Yuxin Zhang; Ali Pirasteh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 4.506

Review 3.  Updates on Imaging of Liver Tumors.

Authors:  Arya Haj-Mirzaian; Ana Kadivar; Ihab R Kamel; Atif Zaheer
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 4.  Radioembolization of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes.

Authors:  F Edward Boas; Lisa Bodei; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  [Computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging of the liver : How, why, what for?]

Authors:  G H Pöhler; K I Ringe
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison and correlation with dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Vincent Lai; Victor Ho Fun Lee; Ka On Lam; Bingsheng Huang; Queenie Chan; Pek Lan Khong
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.