Literature DB >> 24079607

Complications of Hartmann takedown in a decade of preferred primary anastomosis.

Ari Garber1, Neil Hyman2, Turner Osler1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary anastomosis with or without proximal diversion is increasingly applied to patients requiring urgent colectomy for complicated disease of the left colon. As such, the Hartmann procedure is now often restricted to patients who are unstable or otherwise poor candidates for primary anastomosis. We sought to define the complication rate of Hartmann takedown in a contemporary setting.
METHODS: Consecutive adult patients undergoing colostomy takedown with colorectal anastomosis at an academic teaching hospital from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2010, were included in the study. Complications were captured prospectively by a single trained nurse practitioner. Demographics, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, interval between Hartmann procedure and subsequent takedown, surgical indication, duration of surgery, surgeon volume and specialty, length of stay, and complications were recorded.
RESULTS: One hundred three patients underwent Hartmann reversal by 16 different surgeons; 7 of these surgeons performed 4 or fewer procedures during the study period. During the same time period, 334 patients underwent a Hartmann procedure at our institution. Seventy-seven of 104 patients (74%) had their index resection for complicated diverticulitis; an anastomotic leak was the second most common indication. The median age was 61 years (range 31 to 84 years), and the interval from Hartmann procedure to reversal ranged from 87 to 1,489 days. Only 8 patients (7.7%) had an ASA of 1. Thirty patients (29.1%) had postoperative complications, and 12 (11%) had 2 or more complications. There were 2 deaths and 4 anastomotic leaks, and 7 patients had inadvertent enterotomies. Only ASA status predicted postoperative complications (P = .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Hartmann takedown is a morbid operation with a substantial risk of inadvertent enterotomy and serious complications. Excluding cases referred from elsewhere, there were more than 5-fold the number of Hartmann procedures than takedowns performed during the study period. This suggests that Hartmann procedures are typically restricted to patients who are also poor candidates for takedown and that their colostomy is likely to be permanent.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomosis; Colostomy; Diverticulitis; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24079607     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  13 in total

1.  Conventional Versus Minimally Invasive Hartmann Takedown: A Meta-analysis of the Literature.

Authors:  Francesco Guerra; Diego Coletta; Celeste Del Basso; Giuseppe Giuliani; Alberto Patriti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic sigmoid resection without diversion in perforated diverticulitis.

Authors:  Nicolás H Dreifuss; Francisco Schlottmann; Jose M Piatti; Maximiliano E Bun; Nicolás A Rotholtz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Reversal of Hartmann's procedure: still a complicated operation.

Authors:  N Horesh; Y Rudnicki; Y Dreznik; A P Zbar; M Gutman; O Zmora; D Rosin
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Hartmann's reversal: factors affecting complications and outcomes.

Authors:  Stewart Whitney; Benjamin D Gross; Alex Mui; Sue Hahn; Blake Read; Joel Bauer
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Retrospective Evaluation of Laparoscopic Versus Open Hartmann's Reversal: A Single-Institution Experience.

Authors:  Shayna Brathwaite; Maureen Kuhrt; Lianbo Yu; Mark Arnold; Syed Husain; Alan E Harzman
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.719

6.  Second-look surgery following Hartmann's procedure for obstructive left-sided colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Naohito Beppu; Fumihiko Kimura; Nagahide Matsubara; Masashi Noda; Naohiro Tomita; Hidenori Yanagi; Naoki Yamanaka
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Disparities in colostomy reversal after Hartmann's procedure for diverticulitis.

Authors:  M C Turner; M D Talbott; C Reed; Z Sun; M L Cox; B Ezekian; K L Sherman; C R Mantyh; J Migaly
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 8.  Is laparoscopy a reliable alternative to laparotomy in Hartmann's reversal? An updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Chavrier; A Alves; B Menahem
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Is Diversion with Ileostomy Non-inferior to Hartmann Resection for Left-sided Colorectal Anastomotic Leak?

Authors:  Caitlin Stafford; Todd D Francone; Peter W Marcello; Patricia L Roberts; Rocco Ricciardi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Hartmann's procedure, reversal and rate of stoma-free survival.

Authors:  S Hallam; B S Mothe; Rmr Tirumulaju
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.