Literature DB >> 26429059

Retrospective Evaluation of Laparoscopic Versus Open Hartmann's Reversal: A Single-Institution Experience.

Shayna Brathwaite1, Maureen Kuhrt, Lianbo Yu, Mark Arnold, Syed Husain, Alan E Harzman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Restoration of intestinal continuity after Hartmann's procedure has significant associated morbidity. There has been a trend toward increasing utilization of laparoscopy in colorectal surgery, with improvements in short-term outcomes. This study evaluates our experience with laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure reversal.
METHODS: All patients who underwent laparoscopic and open reversal of Hartmann's procedure between 2007 and 2010 were reviewed. Demographics, length of stay, postoperative morbidity, and mortality were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: Nineteen patients underwent laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal and 62 underwent open reversal. There were no statistically significant differences in demographics, comorbidities, mean operative times, blood loss, reoperation, and readmission rates between the groups. The laparoscopic group had a shorter length of hospitalization (5.7 vs. 7.9 d, P<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's pouch is a safe and feasible alternative to the open reversal technique. Patients who undergo the laparoscopic technique have a shorter length of hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26429059      PMCID: PMC4815925          DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  14 in total

1.  Hartmann's reversal is associated with high postoperative adverse events.

Authors:  H Nail Aydin; Feza H Remzi; Paris P Tekkis; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 2.  Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M M Reza; J A Blasco; E Andradas; R Cantero; J Mayol
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Faek R Jamali; Asaad M Soweid; Hani Dimassi; Charles Bailey; Joel Leroy; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2008-08

4.  Complications of Hartmann takedown in a decade of preferred primary anastomosis.

Authors:  Ari Garber; Neil Hyman; Turner Osler
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Complication rates after Hartmann's reversal: open vs. laparoscopic approach.

Authors:  Christopher Haughn; Brian Ju; Miro Uchal; Jean Pierre Arnaud; James F Reed; Roberto Bergamaschi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Quality of life with a temporary stoma: ileostomy vs. colostomy.

Authors:  A W Gooszen; R H Geelkerken; J Hermans; M B Lagaay; H G Gooszen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Feasibility and morbidity of reversal of Hartmann's.

Authors:  S Banerjee; A J M Leather; J A Rennie; N Samano; J G Gonzalez; S Papagrigoriadis
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 8.  Conventional and laparoscopic reversal of the Hartmann procedure: a review of literature.

Authors:  Bryan Joost Marinus van de Wall; Werner A Draaisma; Esther S Schouten; Ivo A M J Broeders; Esther C J Consten
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Laparoscopic and open reversal of Hartmann's procedure--a comparative retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Haggi Mazeh; Alexander J Greenstein; Kristin Swedish; Scott Q Nguyen; Aaron Lipskar; Kaare J Weber; Edward H Chin; Celia M Divino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Reversal of Hartmann's procedure: effect of timing and technique on ease and safety.

Authors:  J O Keck; B T Collopy; P J Ryan; R Fink; J R Mackay; R J Woods
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  2 in total

1.  Conventional Versus Minimally Invasive Hartmann Takedown: A Meta-analysis of the Literature.

Authors:  Francesco Guerra; Diego Coletta; Celeste Del Basso; Giuseppe Giuliani; Alberto Patriti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Is laparoscopy a reliable alternative to laparotomy in Hartmann's reversal? An updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Chavrier; A Alves; B Menahem
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.781

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.