Literature DB >> 24079307

Unfalsifiability and mutual translatability of major modeling schemes for choice reaction time.

Matt Jones1, Ehtibar N Dzhafarov2.   

Abstract

[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 121(1) of Psychological Review (see record 2014-03591-005). The link to supplemental material was missing. All versions of this article have been corrected.] Much current research on speeded choice utilizes models in which the response is triggered by a stochastic process crossing a deterministic threshold. This article focuses on 2 such model classes, 1 based on continuous-time diffusion and the other on linear ballistic accumulation (LBA). Both models assume random variability in growth rates and in other model components across trials. We show that if the form of this variability is unconstrained, the models can exactly match any possible pattern of response probabilities and response time distributions. Thus, the explanatory or predictive content of these models is determined not by their structural assumptions but, rather, by distributional assumptions (e.g., Gaussian distributions) that are traditionally regarded as implementation details. Selective influence assumptions (i.e., which experimental manipulations affect which model parameters) are shown to have no restrictive effect, except for the theoretically questionable assumption that speed-accuracy instructions do not affect growth rates. The 2nd contribution of this article concerns translation of falsifiable models between universal modeling languages. Specifically, we translate the predictions of the diffusion and LBA models (with their parametric and selective influence assumptions intact) into the Grice modeling framework, in which accumulation processes are deterministic and thresholds are random variables. The Grice framework is also known to reproduce any possible pattern of response probabilities and times, and hence it can be used as a common language for comparing models. It is found that only a few simple properties of empirical data are necessary predictions of the diffusion and LBA models. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24079307     DOI: 10.1037/a0034190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  29 in total

1.  How to discriminate conclusively among different models of decision making?

Authors:  David Thura
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Modelling individual difference in visual categorization.

Authors:  Jianhong Shen; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2016-11-10

Review 3.  The diffusion model is not a deterministic growth model: comment on Jones and Dzhafarov (2014).

Authors:  Philip L Smith; Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Proximity model of perceived numerosity.

Authors:  Jüri Allik; Aire Raidvee
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Determining informative priors for cognitive models.

Authors:  Michael D Lee; Wolf Vanpaemel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

6.  On the Relation Between the (Censored) Shifted Wald and the Wiener Distribution as Measurement Models for Choice Response Times.

Authors:  Robert Miller; Stefan Scherbaum; Daniel W Heck; Thomas Goschke; Sören Enge
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-05-30

7.  A single trial analysis of EEG in recognition memory: Tracking the neural correlates of memory strength.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Per B Sederberg; Troy A Smith; Russ Childers
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Corticostriatal output gating during selection from working memory.

Authors:  Christopher H Chatham; Michael J Frank; David Badre
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Mads Lund Pedersen; Michael J Frank; Guido Biele
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

Review 10.  Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith; Scott D Brown; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.