Literature DB >> 27966103

The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in reinforcement learning.

Mads Lund Pedersen1,2, Michael J Frank3, Guido Biele4,5.   

Abstract

Current reinforcement-learning models often assume simplified decision processes that do not fully reflect the dynamic complexities of choice processes. Conversely, sequential-sampling models of decision making account for both choice accuracy and response time, but assume that decisions are based on static decision values. To combine these two computational models of decision making and learning, we implemented reinforcement-learning models in which the drift diffusion model describes the choice process, thereby capturing both within- and across-trial dynamics. To exemplify the utility of this approach, we quantitatively fit data from a common reinforcement-learning paradigm using hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation, and compared model variants to determine whether they could capture the effects of stimulant medication in adult patients with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The model with the best relative fit provided a good description of the learning process, choices, and response times. A parameter recovery experiment showed that the hierarchical Bayesian modeling approach enabled accurate estimation of the model parameters. The model approach described here, using simultaneous estimation of reinforcement-learning and drift diffusion model parameters, shows promise for revealing new insights into the cognitive and neural mechanisms of learning and decision making, as well as the alteration of such processes in clinical groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian modeling; Decision making; Mathematical models; Reinforcement learning

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27966103      PMCID: PMC5487295          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1199-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  74 in total

1.  Transformation of stimulus value signals into motor commands during simple choice.

Authors:  Todd A Hare; Wolfram Schultz; Colin F Camerer; John P O'Doherty; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Feedback-driven trial-by-trial learning in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Marjorie Solomon; Michael J Frank; J Daniel Ragland; Anne C Smith; Tara A Niendam; Tyler A Lesh; David S Grayson; Jonathan S Beck; John C Matter; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 3.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 4.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Using diffusion models to understand clinical disorders.

Authors:  Corey N White; Roger Ratcliff; Michael W Vasey; Gail McKoon
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.223

6.  Opponent actor learning (OpAL): modeling interactive effects of striatal dopamine on reinforcement learning and choice incentive.

Authors:  Anne G E Collins; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  M N Shadlen; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  The ubiquity of model-based reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Bradley B Doll; Dylan A Simon; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  A default Bayesian hypothesis test for correlations and partial correlations.

Authors:  Ruud Wetzels; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

10.  Evidence Accumulation and Choice Maintenance Are Dissociated in Human Perceptual Decision Making.

Authors:  Mads Lund Pedersen; Tor Endestad; Guido Biele
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  52 in total

1.  Modeling the interaction of numerosity and perceptual variables with the diffusion model.

Authors:  Inhan Kang; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Value-Based Choice, Contingency Learning, and Suicidal Behavior in Mid- and Late-Life Depression.

Authors:  Alexandre Y Dombrovski; Michael N Hallquist; Vanessa M Brown; Jonathan Wilson; Katalin Szanto
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Combining error-driven models of associative learning with evidence accumulation models of decision-making.

Authors:  David K Sewell; Hayley K Jach; Russell J Boag; Christina A Van Heer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

4.  Catecholaminergic challenge uncovers distinct Pavlovian and instrumental mechanisms of motivated (in)action.

Authors:  Jennifer C Swart; Monja I Froböse; Jennifer L Cook; Dirk Em Geurts; Michael J Frank; Roshan Cools; Hanneke Em den Ouden
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Uncertainty in learning, choice, and visual fixation.

Authors:  Hrvoje Stojić; Jacob L Orquin; Peter Dayan; Raymond J Dolan; Maarten Speekenbrink
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Dopaminergic Modulation of Human Intertemporal Choice: A Diffusion Model Analysis Using the D2-Receptor Antagonist Haloperidol.

Authors:  Ben Wagner; Mareike Clos; Tobias Sommer; Jan Peters
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Internal and external sources of variability in perceptual decision-making.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Chelsea Voskuilen; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Errors in Action Timing and Inhibition Facilitate Learning by Tuning Distinct Mechanisms in the Underlying Decision Process.

Authors:  Kyle Dunovan; Timothy Verstynen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Where perception meets belief updating: Computational evidence for slower updating of visual expectations in anxious individuals.

Authors:  Jonathon R Howlett; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.839

10.  Pure correlates of exploration and exploitation in the human brain.

Authors:  Tommy C Blanchard; Samuel J Gershman
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.