Literature DB >> 16984315

Parametric and nonparametric FDR estimation revisited.

Baolin Wu1, Zhong Guan, Hongyu Zhao.   

Abstract

Nonparametric and parametric approaches have been proposed to estimate false discovery rate under the independent hypothesis testing assumption. The parametric approach has been shown to have better performance than the nonparametric approaches. In this article, we study the nonparametric approaches and quantify the underlying relations between parametric and nonparametric approaches. Our study reveals the conservative nature of the nonparametric approaches, and establishes the connections between the empirical Bayes method and p-value-based nonparametric methods. Based on our results, we advocate using the parametric approach, or directly modeling the test statistics using the empirical Bayes method.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16984315     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00531.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  11 in total

1.  Bias and variance reduction in estimating the proportion of true-null hypotheses.

Authors:  Yebin Cheng; Dexiang Gao; Tiejun Tong
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Estimating the Proportion of True Null Hypotheses Using the Pattern of Observed p-values.

Authors:  Tiejun Tong; Zeny Feng; Julia S Hilton; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 1.404

3.  A semiparametric Bayesian approach for estimating the gene expression distribution.

Authors:  Fei Zou; Hanwen Huang; Joseph G Ibrahim
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.051

4.  Interpretation of genomic data: questions and answers.

Authors:  Richard Simon
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.851

5.  Extreme value theory in analysis of differential expression in microarrays where either only up- or down-regulated genes are relevant or expected.

Authors:  Renata Ivanek; Yrjö T Gröhn; Martin T Wells; Sarita Raengpradub; Mark J Kazmierczak; Martin Wiedmann
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  The urine proteome for radiation biodosimetry: effect of total body vs. local kidney irradiation.

Authors:  Mukut Sharma; Brian D Halligan; Bassam T Wakim; Virginia J Savin; Eric P Cohen; John E Moulder
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  Parallel multiplicity and error discovery rate (EDR) in microarray experiments.

Authors:  Wayne Wenzhong Xu; Clay J Carter
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  A new test statistic based on shrunken sample variance for identifying differentially expressed genes in small microarray experiments.

Authors:  Akihiro Hirakawa; Yasunori Sato; Chikuma Hamada; Isao Yoshimura
Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights       Date:  2008-02-29

9.  Estimating the false discovery rate using mixed normal distribution for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.

Authors:  Akihiro Hirakawa; Yasunori Sato; Takashi Sozu; Chikuma Hamada; Isao Yoshimura
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2008-01-22

10.  Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures.

Authors:  Xin Lu; David L Perkins
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.