Literature DB >> 24078527

Functional acetabular component position with supine total hip replacement.

W Eilander1, S J Harris, H E Henkus, J P Cobb, T Hogervorst.   

Abstract

Orientation of the acetabular component influences wear, range of movement and the incidence of dislocation after total hip replacement (THR). During surgery, such orientation is often referenced to the anterior pelvic plane (APP), but APP inclination relative to the coronal plane (pelvic tilt) varies substantially between individuals. In contrast, the change in pelvic tilt from supine to standing (dPT) is small for nearly all individuals. Therefore, in THR performed with the patient supine and the patient's coronal plane parallel to the operating table, we propose that freehand placement of the acetabular component placement is reliable and reflects standing (functional) cup position. We examined this hypothesis in 56 hips in 56 patients (19 men) with a mean age of 61 years (29 to 80) using three-dimensional CT pelvic reconstructions and standing lateral pelvic radiographs. We found a low variability of acetabular component placement, with 46 implants (82%) placed within a combined range of 30° to 50° inclination and 5° to 25° anteversion. Changing from the supine to the standing position (analysed in 47 patients) was associated with an anteversion change < 10° in 45 patients (96%). dPT was < 10° in 41 patients (87%). In conclusion, supine THR appears to provide reliable freehand acetabular component placement. In most patients a small reclination of the pelvis going from supine to standing causes a small increase in anteversion of the acetabular component.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-CT; Acetabular component; Anterior approach; Cup; Cup placement; Hip; Pelvic tilt; Sacral slope; Supine; Total hip prosthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24078527     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B10.31446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  16 in total

1.  Pelvic tilt compensates for increased acetabular anteversion.

Authors:  Robert K Zahn; Sarah Grotjohann; Heiko Ramm; Stefan Zachow; Michael Putzier; Carsten Perka; Stephan Tohtz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Can combining femoral and acetabular morphology parameters improve the characterization of femoroacetabular impingement?

Authors:  Heinse W Bouma; Tom Hogervorst; Emmanuel Audenaert; Peter Krekel; Paulien M van Kampen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Analysis of acetabular orientation and femoral anteversion using images of three-dimensional reconstructed bone models.

Authors:  Jaeyeong Park; Jun-Young Kim; Hyun Deok Kim; Young Cheol Kim; Anna Seo; Minkyu Je; Jong Uk Mun; Bia Kim; Il Hyung Park; Shin-Yoon Kim
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Customized implants for acetabular Paprosky III defects may be positioned with high accuracy in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Markus Weber; Lena Witzmann; Jan Wieding; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz; Benjamin Craiovan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Accuracy of the modified Hardinge approach in acetabular positioning.

Authors:  Prateek Goyal; Adrian Lau; Richard McCalden; Matthew G Teeter; James L Howard; Brent A Lanting
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  A new method for intraoperative assessment of leg length, sizing and placement of the components in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Ioannis P Stathopoulos; Nicolaos Andrianopoulos; Dimitrios Paschaloglou; Kalliopi Lampropoulou-Adamidou; Maria Spetsaki; Ioannis K Tsarouchas
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-01-02

7.  The kinematic relationship between sitting and standing posture and pelvic inclination and its significance to cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew Stephens; Selin Munir; Siddarth Shah; William Lindsay Walter
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Cup positioning and its effect on polyethylene wear of vitamin E- and non-vitamin E-supplemented liners in total hip arthroplasty: radiographic outcome at 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Josef Baghdadi; Shareef Alkhateeb; Alexander Roth; Marcus Jäger
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Cup position alone does not predict risk of dislocation after hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christina I Esposito; Brian P Gladnick; Yuo-Yu Lee; Stephen Lyman; Timothy M Wright; David J Mayman; Douglas E Padgett
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  The distance between the femoral nerve and anterior acetabulum is significantly shorter in hip osteoarthritis than in non-osteoarthritis hip.

Authors:  Kensuke Yoshino; Shigeo Hagiwara; Junichi Nakamura; Takuro Horikoshi; Hajime Yokota; Kenji Shimokawa; Koji Matsumoto; Yuki Shiko; Yohei Kawasaki; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.