Literature DB >> 24077026

Effects of MRTI sampling characteristics on estimation of HIFU SAR and tissue thermal diffusivity.

C R Dillon1, N Todd, A Payne, D L Parker, D A Christensen, R B Roemer.   

Abstract

While the non-invasive and three-dimensional nature of magnetic-resonance temperature imaging (MRTI) makes it a valuable tool for high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatments, random and systematic errors in MRTI measurements may propagate into temperature-based parameter estimates used for pretreatment planning. This study assesses the MRTI effects of zero-mean Gaussian noise (SD = 0.0-2.0 °C), temporal sampling (tacq = 1.0-8.0 s), and spatial averaging (Res = 0.5-2.0 mm isotropic) on HIFU temperature measurements and temperature-based estimates of the amplitude and full width half maximum (FWHM) of the HIFU specific absorption rate and of tissue thermal diffusivity. The ultrasound beam used in simulations and ex vivo pork loin experiments has lateral and axial FWHM dimensions of 1.4 mm and 7.9 mm respectively. For spatial averaging simulations, beams with lateral FWHM varying from 1.2-2.2 mm are also assessed. Under noisy conditions, parameter estimates are improved by fitting to data from larger voxel regions. Varying the temporal sampling results in minimal changes in measured temperatures (<2% change) and parameter estimates (<5% change). For the HIFU beams studied, a spatial resolution of 1 × 1 × 3 mm(3) or smaller is required to keep errors in temperature and all estimated parameters less than 10%. By quantifying the errors associated with these sampling characteristics, this work provides researchers with appropriate MRTI conditions for obtaining estimates of parameters essential to pretreatment modeling of HIFU thermal therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24077026      PMCID: PMC3864578          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/20/7291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  24 in total

1.  Non-contact measurement of thermal diffusivity in tissue.

Authors:  S A Telenkov; J I Youn; D M Goodman; A J Welch; T E Milner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of boiling induced by high intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Tatiana D Khokhlova; Michael S Canney; Donghoon Lee; Kenneth I Marro; Lawrence A Crum; Vera A Khokhlova; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Noninvasive measurement of local thermal diffusivity using backscattered ultrasound and focused ultrasound heating.

Authors:  Ajay Anand; Peter J Kaczkowski
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Tissue thermal conductivity by magnetic resonance thermometry and focused ultrasound heating.

Authors:  Hai-Ling Margaret Cheng; Donald B Plewes
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Effects of heat conduction and sample size on ultrasonic absorption measurements.

Authors:  K J Parker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Noninvasive MRI thermometry with the proton resonance frequency (PRF) method: in vivo results in human muscle.

Authors:  J De Poorter; C De Wagter; Y De Deene; C Thomsen; F Ståhlberg; E Achten
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  The simultaneous measurement of thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity, and perfusion in small volumes of tissue.

Authors:  J W Valvano; J T Allen; H F Bowman
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Obtaining local SAR and blood perfusion data from temperature measurements: steady state and transient techniques compared.

Authors:  R B Roemer; A M Fletcher; T C Cetas
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  Engineering aspects of hyperthermia therapy.

Authors:  R B Roemer
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.590

10.  Estimation of thermal dose from MR thermometry during application of nonablative pulsed high intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Brian E O'Neill; Christof Karmonik; Elisabetta Sassaroli; King C Li
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  9 in total

1.  Model predictive filtering MR thermometry: Effects of model inaccuracies, k-space reduction factor, and temperature increase rate.

Authors:  Henrik Odéen; Nick Todd; Christopher Dillon; Allison Payne; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Magnetic resonance temperature imaging-based quantification of blood flow-related energy losses.

Authors:  Christopher Dillon; Robert Roemer; Allison Payne
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Sensitivity of tissue properties derived from MRgFUS temperature data to input errors and data inclusion criteria: ex vivo study in porcine muscle.

Authors:  Y C Shi; D L Parker; C R Dillon
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Development and validation of a MRgHIFU non-invasive tissue acoustic property estimation technique.

Authors:  Sara L Johnson; Christopher Dillon; Henrik Odéen; Dennis Parker; Douglas Christensen; Allison Payne
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.914

5.  Analytical estimation of ultrasound properties, thermal diffusivity, and perfusion using magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound temperature data.

Authors:  C R Dillon; G Borasi; A Payne
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  3D-specific absorption rate estimation from high-intensity focused ultrasound sonications using the Green's function heat kernel.

Authors:  Nicholas J Freeman; Henrik Odéen; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  The accuracy and precision of two non-invasive, magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound-based thermal diffusivity estimation methods.

Authors:  Christopher R Dillon; Allison Payne; Douglas A Christensen; Robert B Roemer
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.914

8.  MR thermometry for focused ultrasound monitoring utilizing model predictive filtering and ultrasound beam modeling.

Authors:  Henrik Odéen; Scott Almquist; Joshua de Bever; Douglas A Christensen; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  J Ther Ultrasound       Date:  2016-09-22

9.  Influence of Magnetic Nanoparticles on the Focused Ultrasound Hyperthermia.

Authors:  Katarzyna Kaczmarek; Tomasz Hornowski; Bernadeta Dobosz; Arkadiusz Józefczak
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.623

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.