Literature DB >> 27385508

Sensitivity of tissue properties derived from MRgFUS temperature data to input errors and data inclusion criteria: ex vivo study in porcine muscle.

Y C Shi1, D L Parker, C R Dillon.   

Abstract

This study evaluates the sensitivity of two magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) thermal property estimation methods to errors in required inputs and different data inclusion criteria. Using ex vivo pork muscle MRgFUS data, sensitivities to required inputs are determined by introducing errors to ultrasound beam locations (r error  =  -2 to 2 mm) and time vectors (t error  =  -2.2 to 2.2 s). In addition, the sensitivity to user-defined data inclusion criteria is evaluated by choosing different spatial (r fit  =  1-10 mm) and temporal (t fit  =  8.8-61.6 s) regions for fitting. Beam location errors resulted in up to 50% change in property estimates with local minima occurring at r error  =  0 and estimate errors less than 10% when r error  <  0.5 mm. Errors in the time vector led to property estimate errors up to 40% and without local minimum, indicating the need to trigger ultrasound sonications with the MR image acquisition. Regarding the selection of data inclusion criteria, property estimates reached stable values (less than 5% change) when r fit  >  2.5  ×  FWHM, and were most accurate with the least variability for longer t fit. Guidelines provided by this study highlight the importance of identifying required inputs and choosing appropriate data inclusion criteria for robust and accurate thermal property estimation. Applying these guidelines will prevent the introduction of biases and avoidable errors when utilizing these property estimation techniques for MRgFUS thermal modeling applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27385508      PMCID: PMC4970232          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/15/N373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  16 in total

1.  The NMR phased array.

Authors:  P B Roemer; W A Edelstein; C E Hayes; S P Souza; O M Mueller
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging-based thermometry and thermal dosimetry during focused ultrasound thermal ablation.

Authors:  Nathan McDannold; Clare M Tempany; Fiona M Fennessy; Minna J So; Frank J Rybicki; Elizabeth A Stewart; Ferenc A Jolesz; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Non-invasive determination of tissue thermal parameters from high intensity focused ultrasound treatment monitored by volumetric MRI thermometry.

Authors:  Iulius Dragonu; Philippe Lourenço de Oliveira; Christophe Laurent; Charles Mougenot; Nicolas Grenier; Chrit T W Moonen; Bruno Quesson
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Tissue thermal conductivity by magnetic resonance thermometry and focused ultrasound heating.

Authors:  Hai-Ling Margaret Cheng; Donald B Plewes
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  A precise and fast temperature mapping using water proton chemical shift.

Authors:  Y Ishihara; A Calderon; H Watanabe; K Okamoto; Y Suzuki; K Kuroda; Y Suzuki
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Noninvasive MRI thermometry with the proton resonance frequency (PRF) method: in vivo results in human muscle.

Authors:  J De Poorter; C De Wagter; Y De Deene; C Thomsen; F Ståhlberg; E Achten
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  MR-guided focus ultrasound (MRgFUS) for symptomatic uterine fibroids: predictors of treatment success.

Authors:  Ronit Machtinger; Yael Inbar; Shlomo Cohen-Eylon; Dahlia Admon; Aviva Alagem-Mizrachi; Jaron Rabinovici
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  The effects of spatial sampling choices on MR temperature measurements.

Authors:  Nick Todd; Urvi Vyas; Josh de Bever; Allison Payne; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery--imaging predictors of success.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna M Lénárd; Nathan J McDannold; Fiona M Fennessy; Elizabeth A Stewart; Ferenc A Jolesz; Kullervo Hynynen; Clare M C Tempany
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Evaluation of a three-dimensional MR acoustic radiation force imaging pulse sequence using a novel unbalanced bipolar motion encoding gradient.

Authors:  Joshua T de Bever; Henrik Odéen; Nick Todd; Alexis I Farrer; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  2 in total

1.  3D-specific absorption rate estimation from high-intensity focused ultrasound sonications using the Green's function heat kernel.

Authors:  Nicholas J Freeman; Henrik Odéen; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  MR thermometry for focused ultrasound monitoring utilizing model predictive filtering and ultrasound beam modeling.

Authors:  Henrik Odéen; Scott Almquist; Joshua de Bever; Douglas A Christensen; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  J Ther Ultrasound       Date:  2016-09-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.