Literature DB >> 24072794

Hawkmoth flight stability in turbulent vortex streets.

Victor Manuel Ortega-Jimenez1, Jeremy S M Greeter, Rajat Mittal, Tyson L Hedrick.   

Abstract

Shedding of vortices is a common phenomenon in the atmosphere over a wide range of spatial and temporal scales. However, it is unclear how these vortices of varying scales affect the flight performance of flying animals. In order to examine these interactions, we trained seven hawkmoths (Manduca sexta) (wingspan ~9 cm) to fly and feed in a wind tunnel under steady flow (controls) and in the von Kármán vortex street of vertically oriented cylinders (two different cylinders with diameters of 10 and 5 cm) at speeds of 0.5, 1 and 2 m s(-1). Cylinders were placed at distances of 5, 25 and 100 cm upstream of the moths. Moths exhibited large amplitude yaw oscillations coupled with modest oscillations in roll and pitch, and slight increases in wingbeat frequency when flying in both the near (recirculating) and middle (vortex dominated) wake regions. Wingbeat amplitude did not vary among treatments, except at 1 m s(-1) for the large cylinder. Yaw and roll oscillations were synchronized with the vortex shedding frequencies in moths flying in the wake of the large cylinder at all speeds. In contrast, yaw and pitch were synchronized with the shedding frequency of small vortices at speeds ≤1 m s(-1). Oscillations in body orientation were also substantially smaller in the small cylinder treatment when compared with the large cylinder, regardless of temporal or non-dimensional spatial scale. Moths flying in steady conditions reached a higher air speed than those flying into cylinder wakes. In general, flight effects produced by the cylinder wakes were qualitatively similar among the recirculating and vortex-dominated wake regions; the magnitude of those effects, however, declined gradually with downstream distance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Manduca sexta; stability; turbulence; unsteady flows; von Kármán vortex; wind tunnel

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24072794     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.089672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  17 in total

1.  Nectar vs. pollen loading affects the tradeoff between flight stability and maneuverability in bumblebees.

Authors:  Andrew M Mountcastle; Sridhar Ravi; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Controlling roll perturbations in fruit flies.

Authors:  Tsevi Beatus; John M Guckenheimer; Itai Cohen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Into turbulent air: size-dependent effects of von Kármán vortex streets on hummingbird flight kinematics and energetics.

Authors:  Victor M Ortega-Jimenez; Nir Sapir; Marta Wolf; Evan A Variano; Robert Dudley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Into rude air: hummingbird flight performance in variable aerial environments.

Authors:  V M Ortega-Jimenez; M Badger; H Wang; R Dudley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flapping-wing flight.

Authors:  Wei Shyy; Chang-Kwon Kang; Pakpong Chirarattananon; Sridhar Ravi; Hao Liu
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.704

6.  Adaptive control of turbulence intensity is accelerated by frugal flow sampling.

Authors:  Daniel B Quinn; Yous van Halder; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Limitations of rotational manoeuvrability in insects and hummingbirds: evaluating the effects of neuro-biomechanical delays and muscle mechanical power.

Authors:  Pan Liu; Bo Cheng
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Wind drives temporal variation in pollinator visitation in a fragmented tropical forest.

Authors:  James D Crall; Julia Brokaw; Susan F Gagliardi; Chase D Mendenhall; Naomi E Pierce; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Foraging in an unsteady world: bumblebee flight performance in field-realistic turbulence.

Authors:  J D Crall; J J Chang; R L Oppenheimer; S A Combes
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

10.  Living in a trash can: turbulent convective flows impair Drosophila flight performance.

Authors:  Victor Manuel Ortega-Jiménez; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.