Literature DB >> 27456311

Patterns of Internet Use by Pregnant Women, and Reliability of Pregnancy-Related Searches.

Deepa Maheswari Narasimhulu1, Scarlett Karakash2, Jeremy Weedon3, Howard Minkoff2.   

Abstract

Objective To assess patterns of e-health use in pregnancy in an underserved racially diverse inner-city population, and to assess the accuracy of pregnancy-related information obtained from the Internet. Methods A cross sectional study of 503 pregnant/postpartum women belonging to an underserved racially diverse inner-city population who completed a survey regarding e-health use. To assess accuracy, four independent expert-reviewers rated the first 10 webpages on Google searches for each of five questions based upon those in ACOG bulletins. Results 70.8 % of pregnant/postpartum women belonging to an underserved racially diverse inner-city population were e-health users. E-health users were younger (mean age 29.4 vs. 31.2, P = 0.009), more likely to be nulliparous (50.3 vs. 21.3 %, P < 0.001), have English as their primary language (62.3 vs. 49.1 %, P = 0.014) and have a college/graduate education (78 vs. 26.6 %, P < 0.001). While 60 % of these women said e-health influenced decision making, only 71.3 % of them discussed their searches with their provider. Expert reviewers determined that the online information was fairly accurate (mean score: +1.48 to +4.33 on a scale of -5 to +5) but not uniformly accurate, and there was at least one webpage with inaccurate information for every question. Conclusions for practice Pregnant women frequently use e-health resources but do not routinely share their findings with their providers. Most, but not all, information obtained is accurate. Therefore it is important for providers to discuss their patients' use, and help to guide them to reliable information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  E-health; Internet; Pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27456311     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-016-2075-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  12 in total

Review 1.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach; John Powell; Oliver Kuss; Eun-Ryoung Sa
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Information contained in miscarriage-related websites and the predictive value of website scoring systems.

Authors:  J Christopher R Hardwick; Fiona M MacKenzie
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2003-01-10       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Internet use in pregnancy informs women's decision making: a web-based survey.

Authors:  Briege M Lagan; Marlene Sinclair; W George Kernohan
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.689

4.  Pregnant women's use of the internet in relation to their pregnancy in Izmir, Turkey.

Authors:  Oya Kavlak; Senay Ünsal Atan; Duygu Güleç; Ruşen Oztürk; Nurten Atay
Journal:  Inform Health Soc Care       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 2.439

5.  A descriptive study of the use of the Internet by women seeking pregnancy-related information.

Authors:  Margareta Larsson
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 2.372

6.  Pregnancy e-health: a multicenter Italian cross-sectional study on Internet use and decision-making among pregnant women.

Authors:  Fabrizio Bert; Maria Rosaria Gualano; Silvio Brusaferro; Elisabetta De Vito; Chiara de Waure; Giuseppe La Torre; Lamberto Manzoli; Gabriele Messina; Tullia Todros; Maria Valeria Torregrossa; Roberta Siliquini
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Describing the use of the internet for health, physical activity, and nutrition information in pregnant women.

Authors:  Jennifer Huberty; Danae Dinkel; Michael W Beets; Jason Coleman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-10

8.  Internet use by Chinese women seeking pregnancy-related information.

Authors:  Ling-ling Gao; Margareta Larsson; Shu-yuan Luo
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 2.372

9.  Racial and ethnic disparities in internet use for seeking health information among young women.

Authors:  Tabassum H Laz; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2012-11-06

10.  Sources of information used by women during pregnancy to meet their information needs.

Authors:  Heather A Grimes; Della A Forster; Michelle S Newton
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 2.372

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  The effect of the Internet on decision-making during pregnancy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ayşe Taştekin Ouyaba; Selma İnfal Kesim
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Communication Technology Use and Preferences for Pregnant Women and Their Caregivers.

Authors:  Megan Shroder; Shilo H Anders; Marian Dorst; Gretchen P Jackson
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

3.  Continuing Education Module-Information Needs and Information-Seeking Processes of Low-Income Pregnant Women in Relation to Digital Maternity Education Resources.

Authors:  Adriana Arcia; Samantha Stonbraker; Eva Rose Asaan Warner
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2019-07-01

4.  Physical Activity in Pregnancy: Beliefs, Benefits, and Information-Seeking Practices of Pregnant Women in South Africa.

Authors:  Uchenna Benedine Okafor; Daniel Ter Goon
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-04-09

5.  Content Quality of YouTube Videos About Gestational Diabetes: Systematic Evaluation.

Authors:  Eleanor M Birch; Karolina Leziak; Jenise Jackson; Emma Dahl; Charlotte M Niznik; Lynn M Yee
Journal:  JMIR Diabetes       Date:  2022-04-07

6.  Time to Push: Use of Gestational Age in the Electronic Health Record to Support Delivery of Relevant Prenatal Education Content.

Authors:  Adriana Arcia
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2017-04-20

Review 7.  eHealth as the Next-Generation Perinatal Care: An Overview of the Literature.

Authors:  Josephus Fm van den Heuvel; T Katrien Groenhof; Jan Hw Veerbeek; Wouter W van Solinge; A Titia Lely; Arie Franx; Mireille N Bekker
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Sources of information used by women during pregnancy and the perceived quality.

Authors:  Maaike Vogels-Broeke; Darie Daemers; Luc Budé; Raymond de Vries; Marianne Nieuwenhuijze
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 9.  The Rise of Pregnancy Apps and the Implications for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Women: Narrative Review.

Authors:  Jo-Anne Patricia Hughson; J Oliver Daly; Robyn Woodward-Kron; John Hajek; David Story
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.773

10.  Pregnancy and health in the age of the Internet: A content analysis of online "birth club" forums.

Authors:  Anna Wexler; Anahita Davoudi; Davy Weissenbacher; Rebekah Choi; Karen O'Connor; Holly Cummings; Graciela Gonzalez-Hernandez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.