Literature DB >> 24072203

Patency of neck veins following ultrasound-guided percutaneous Hickman line insertion.

R C Wragg1, S Blundell, M Bader, B Sharif, J Bennett, I Jester, P Bromley, G S Arul.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Venous occlusion following permanent central venous catheter (CVC) insertion by open cutdown or the landmark percutaneous technique has been reported between up to 25 %. However, there are no published data on the equivalent rate following ultrasound-guided percutaneous CVC insertion. The purpose of this study was to document the rate of venous occlusion associated with ultrasound-guided percutaneous CVC insertion in children.
METHOD: From 1 April 2010 to 1 December 2011, all children having elective or emergency removal of a Hickman line by the vascular access team had a Doppler ultrasound of their neck veins. Only Hickman lines inserted by the ultrasound-guided percutaneous route were included. Internal jugular, innominate and subclavian veins were scanned and recorded as patent, reduced or absent.
RESULTS: We identified 100 consecutive children. Median age was 6 years (range 21 days to 16 years). Indication for insertion was chemotherapy (60), parenteral nutrition (15), blood products (12), renal replacement (3) and other indications (10). Three children had absent flow at the time of line removal (median age 4 months, range 3-6 months), with 2 out of 3 requiring removal for infection. The venous occlusion rate following ultrasound-guided insertion of CVC is 3 % in our study.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that (1) complete venous occlusion is associated with younger age and CVC infection. (2) In our study, the venous occlusion rate of 3 % is significantly lower than the published series of either open cutdown or the landmark technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24072203     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-013-3416-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  14 in total

1.  Central venous thrombosis: an early and frequent complication in cancer patients bearing long-term silastic catheter. A prospective study.

Authors:  M De Cicco; M Matovic; L Balestreri; G Panarello; D Fantin; S Morassut; V Testa
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 3.944

2.  A silicone rubber atrial catheter for prolonged parenteral alimentation.

Authors:  J W Broviac; J J Cole; B H Scribner
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1973-04

3.  Ultrasound-guided percutaneous insertion of 2.7 Fr tunnelled Broviac lines in neonates and small infants.

Authors:  G S Arul; H Livingstone; P Bromley; J Bennett
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-06-13       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement by surgical trainees: a safe procedure?

Authors:  Marijn Hameeteman; Aron S Bode; Arnoud G Peppelenbosch; Frank M van der Sande; Jan H M Tordoir
Journal:  J Vasc Access       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.283

5.  Shifting from open surgical cut down to ultrasound-guided percutaneous central venous catheterization in children: learning curve and related complications.

Authors:  S Avanzini; E Guida; M Conte; F Faranda; P Buffa; C Granata; E Castagnola; G Fratino; L Mameli; A Michelazzi; A Pini-Prato; G Mattioli; A C Molinari; E Lanino; V Jasonni
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Transcutaneously tunneled central venous lines in cancer patients: an analysis of device-related morbidity factors based on prospective data collection.

Authors:  R E Schwarz; D G Coit; J S Groeger
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Ultrasound-guided percutaneous insertion of Hickman lines in children. Prospective study of 500 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  G Suren Arul; Nicola Lewis; Peter Bromley; James Bennett
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Percutaneous placement of central venous catheters: comparing the anatomical landmark method with the radiologically guided technique for central venous catheterization through the internal jugular vein in emergent hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  M Koroglu; M Demir; B K Koroglu; M T Sezer; O Akhan; H Yildiz; L Yavuz; B Baykal; O Oyar
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 9.  NICE guidelines for central venous catheterization in children. Is the evidence base sufficient?

Authors:  C R Grebenik; A Boyce; M E Sinclair; R D Evans; D G Mason; B Martin
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  The risk factors in central venous catheter-related thrombosis.

Authors:  C Köksoy; A Kuzu; I Erden; A Akkaya
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1995-11
View more
  4 in total

1.  Unexpected tunnelled central venous access demise: a single institutional study from the UK.

Authors:  Georgina Bough; Nicholas J Lambert; Florin Djendov; Claire Jackson
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Risks of long-term port use in enzyme replacement therapy for lysosomal storage disorders.

Authors:  Christian J Hendriksz; Paul Harmatz; Roberto Giugliani; Jane Roberts; G Suren Arul
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab Rep       Date:  2018-03-07

3.  Factors affecting mechanical complications of central venous access devices in children.

Authors:  Jessica J Zhang; Ramesh M Nataraja; Amiria Lynch; Richard Barnes; Peter Ferguson; Maurizio Pacilli
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.003

4.  Hickman to central venous catheter: A case of difficult venous access in a child suffering from acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Arunangshu Chakraborty; Sanjit Agrawal; Taniya Datta; Suparna Mitra; Rakhi Khemka
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.