Literature DB >> 20549506

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous insertion of 2.7 Fr tunnelled Broviac lines in neonates and small infants.

G S Arul1, H Livingstone, P Bromley, J Bennett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Insertion of permanent central venous access (Broviac line) can be a challenge in neonates especially when sites for peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) have been exhausted. The landmark technique (LT) has been well described for the percutaneous insertion of central lines in neonates but can be associated with significant complications including death. The use of the ultrasound-guided approach for temporary central line access has been reported but as yet there are no reports of the adaptation of the technique for Broviac line insertion in neonates.
METHOD: A prospective database records all procedures carried out by the vascular access team and any complications which occur; this database was reviewed from November 2004 to January 2008.
RESULTS: A consecutive series of 34 neonates underwent insertion of 36 Broviac lines using the ultrasound-guided percutaneous technique with a 2.7 Fr silastic line and a 3 Fr peel-apart sheath. Median gestational age was 34 weeks (range 24-40), chronological age was 102 days (14-209 days), weight 2.9 kg (0.63-4.1). Successful cannulation occurred in 100% of patients. There were no cases of arterial puncture or perioperative complications due to surgery.
CONCLUSION: The ultrasound-guided percutaneous approach for insertion of tunnelled permanent vascular access is safe in neonates with no surgical complications in our series. However, it is a technically demanding procedure to do in neonates and should not be attempted without significant prior experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20549506     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-010-2616-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  20 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound for central venous cannulation: economic evaluation of cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  N Calvert; D Hind; R McWilliams; A Davidson; C A Beverley; S M Thomas
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Technique for placement of a permanent home hyperalimentation catheter.

Authors:  D M Heimbach; T D Ivey
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1976-10

3.  Perforation of the heart by central venous catheters in infants: guidelines to diagnosis and management.

Authors:  G Bar-Joseph; A G Galvis
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Pericardial tamponade: complication of total parenteral nutrition.

Authors:  P B Kulkarni; R D Dorand; E M Simmons
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation in a very small preterm neonate.

Authors:  Andreas Machotta; Sabine Kerner; Claudia Höhne; Thoralf Kerner
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.556

6.  Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation in infants and children.

Authors:  P Asheim; U Mostad; P Aadahl
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.105

7.  Outcome of tunneled hemodialysis catheters placed via the right internal jugular vein by interventional radiologists.

Authors:  S O Trerotola; M S Johnson; V J Harris; H Shah; W T Ambrosius; M A McKusky; M A Kraus
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Ultrasound-guided percutaneous insertion of Hickman lines in children. Prospective study of 500 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  G Suren Arul; Nicola Lewis; Peter Bromley; James Bennett
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  A randomized trial of ultrasound image-based skin surface marking versus real-time ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein catheterization in infants.

Authors:  Koji Hosokawa; Nobuaki Shime; Yuko Kato; Satoru Hashimoto
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 10.  NICE guidelines for central venous catheterization in children. Is the evidence base sufficient?

Authors:  C R Grebenik; A Boyce; M E Sinclair; R D Evans; D G Mason; B Martin
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 9.166

View more
  4 in total

1.  Insertion of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates less than 1.5 kg using ultrasound guidance.

Authors:  Kevin N Johnson; Tina Thomas; Jason Grove; Marcus D Jarboe
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Patency of neck veins following ultrasound-guided percutaneous Hickman line insertion.

Authors:  R C Wragg; S Blundell; M Bader; B Sharif; J Bennett; I Jester; P Bromley; G S Arul
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Ultrasound-guided Central Line Insertion and Standard Peripherally Inserted Catheter Placement in Preterm Infants: Comparing Results from Prospective Study in a Single-center.

Authors:  Dany Antanios Al Hamod; Smart Zeidan; Ayah Al Bizri; Georges Baaklini; Yolla Nassif
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2016-05

4.  Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland: Safe vascular access 2016.

Authors:  A Bodenham Chair; S Babu; J Bennett; R Binks; P Fee; B Fox; A J Johnston; A A Klein; J A Langton; H Mclure; S Q M Tighe
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 6.955

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.