PURPOSE: Genome-scale clinical sequencing is being adopted more broadly in medical practice. The National Institutes of Health developed the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) program to guide implementation and dissemination of best practices for the integration of sequencing into clinical care. This study describes and compares the state of the art of incorporating whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing results into the electronic health record, including approaches to decision support across the six current CSER sites. METHODS: The CSER Medical Record Working Group collaboratively developed and completed an in-depth survey to assess the communication of genome-scale data into the electronic health record. We summarized commonalities and divergent approaches. RESULTS: Despite common sequencing platform (Illumina) adoptions, there is a great diversity of approaches to annotation tools and workflow, as well as to report generation. At all sites, reports are human-readable structured documents available as passive decision support in the electronic health record. Active decision support is in early implementation at two sites. CONCLUSION: The parallel efforts across CSER sites in the creation of systems for report generation and integration of reports into the electronic health record, as well as the lack of standardized approaches to interfacing with variant databases to create active clinical decision support, create opportunities for cross-site and vendor collaborations.
PURPOSE: Genome-scale clinical sequencing is being adopted more broadly in medical practice. The National Institutes of Health developed the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) program to guide implementation and dissemination of best practices for the integration of sequencing into clinical care. This study describes and compares the state of the art of incorporating whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing results into the electronic health record, including approaches to decision support across the six current CSER sites. METHODS: The CSER Medical Record Working Group collaboratively developed and completed an in-depth survey to assess the communication of genome-scale data into the electronic health record. We summarized commonalities and divergent approaches. RESULTS: Despite common sequencing platform (Illumina) adoptions, there is a great diversity of approaches to annotation tools and workflow, as well as to report generation. At all sites, reports are human-readable structured documents available as passive decision support in the electronic health record. Active decision support is in early implementation at two sites. CONCLUSION: The parallel efforts across CSER sites in the creation of systems for report generation and integration of reports into the electronic health record, as well as the lack of standardized approaches to interfacing with variant databases to create active clinical decision support, create opportunities for cross-site and vendor collaborations.
Authors: Vikrant G Deshmukh; Mark A Hoffman; Catherine Arnoldi; Bruce E Bray; Joyce A Mitchell Journal: Methods Inf Med Date: 2009-03-31 Impact factor: 2.176
Authors: J K Hicks; K R Crews; J M Hoffman; N M Kornegay; M R Wilkinson; R Lorier; A Stoddard; W Yang; C Smith; C A Fernandez; S J Cross; C Haidar; D K Baker; S C Howard; W E Evans; U Broeckel; M V Relling Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2012-09-19 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Daniel R Masys; Gail P Jarvik; Neil F Abernethy; Nicholas R Anderson; George J Papanicolaou; Dina N Paltoo; Mark A Hoffman; Isaac S Kohane; Howard P Levy Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2011-12-27 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Catherine A McCarty; Rex L Chisholm; Christopher G Chute; Iftikhar J Kullo; Gail P Jarvik; Eric B Larson; Rongling Li; Daniel R Masys; Marylyn D Ritchie; Dan M Roden; Jeffery P Struewing; Wendy A Wolf Journal: BMC Med Genomics Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 3.063
Authors: Casey Lynnette Overby; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch; James I Hoath; Ira J Kalet; David L Veenstra Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Samuel J Aronson; Eugene H Clark; Matthew Varugheese; Samantha Baxter; Lawrence J Babb; Heidi L Rehm Journal: Genet Med Date: 2012-04-05 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Jonathan S Berg; Laura M Amendola; Christine Eng; Eliezer Van Allen; Stacy W Gray; Nikhil Wagle; Heidi L Rehm; Elizabeth T DeChene; Matthew C Dulik; Fuki M Hisama; Wylie Burke; Nancy B Spinner; Levi Garraway; Robert C Green; Sharon Plon; James P Evans; Gail P Jarvik Journal: Genet Med Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Anya E R Prince; John M Conley; Arlene M Davis; Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz; R Jean Cadigan Journal: J Law Med Ethics Date: 2015 Impact factor: 1.718
Authors: Casey L Overby; Luke V Rasmussen; Andrea Hartzler; John J Connolly; Josh F Peterson; RoseMary E Hedberg; Robert R Freimuth; Brian H Shirts; Joshua C Denny; Eric B Larson; Christopher G Chute; Gail P Jarvik; James D Ralston; Alan R Shuldiner; Justin Starren; Iftikhar J Kullo; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch; Marc S Williams Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2014-11-14
Authors: Brian H Shirts; Joseph S Salama; Samuel J Aronson; Wendy K Chung; Stacy W Gray; Lucia A Hindorff; Gail P Jarvik; Sharon E Plon; Elena M Stoffel; Peter Z Tarczy-Hornoch; Eliezer M Van Allen; Karen E Weck; Christopher G Chute; Robert R Freimuth; Robert W Grundmeier; Andrea L Hartzler; Rongling Li; Peggy L Peissig; Josh F Peterson; Luke V Rasmussen; Justin B Starren; Marc S Williams; Casey L Overby Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2015-07-03 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Michael O Dorschner; Laura M Amendola; Brian H Shirts; Lesli Kiedrowski; Joseph Salama; Adam S Gordon; Stephanie M Fullerton; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch; Peter H Byers; Gail P Jarvik Journal: Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 3.908
Authors: Luke V Rasmussen; Casey L Overby; John Connolly; Christopher G Chute; Joshua C Denny; Robert Freimuth; Andrea L Hartzler; Ingrid A Holm; Shannon Manzi; Jyotishman Pathak; Peggy L Peissig; Maureen Smith; Marc S Williams; Brian H Shirts; Elena M Stoffel; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch; Carolyn R Rohrer Vitek; Wendy A Wolf; Justin Starren Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 2.342