Literature DB >> 24070700

Prediction of paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation by computed tomography: value of aortic valve and annular calcification.

Gudrun Feuchtner1, Fabian Plank, Thomas Bartel, Silvana Mueller, Jonathon Leipsic, Thomas Schachner, Ludwig Müller, Guy Friedrich, Andrea Klauser, Michael Grimm, Nikolaos Bonaros.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to quantify and characterize aortic valve leaflet and aortic annular calcification with computed tomography angiography (CTA) and to define whether they predict paravalvular regurgitation (PAR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
METHODS: In all, 94 patients (aged 83.6 years) with severe aortic stenosis underwent CTA. Annular calcification was measured in two planes and defined as "protruding" (depth greater than length), "round," or "adherent" (length less than depth) for the right, left, and noncoronary annulus. Leaflet calcification severity and asymmetry were scored. Transthoracic echocardiography graduation of PAR severity was performed after the procedure (0.5 scale).
RESULTS: Thirty-two percent of patients had no or trivial PAR (grade less than 1) and 68% had mild to severe PAR (≥ 1 [mild 45.7%, moderate 20.2%, moderate to severe 2.1%]). The size of annular calcium was higher in patients with moderate to severe PAR greater than 1 (p = 0.015, p = 0.007, and p = 0.004) and predictive (c = 0.67, 0.71, and 0.711) for noncoronary, left, and total annular calcium size, respectively. Increasing PAR severity was correlated with increasing total calcium size (r = 0.422, p < 0.001). Protruding annular calcification greater than 4 mm (p = 0.02) was more frequently found in moderate to severe PAR greater than 1, and predictive (c = 0.7). Adherent calcium greater than 4 mm did not predict PAR greater than 1 and PAR of 1 or less. There was no association of leaflet calcium severity and asymmetry with PAR severity.
CONCLUSIONS: Protruding annular calcium greater than 4 mm predicts moderate to severe PAR after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Increasing annular calcium size is another predictor, whereas adherent calcium has a "sealing" effect.
Copyright © 2013 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  35

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24070700     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.06.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  10 in total

Review 1.  Paravalvular regurgitation following transcutaneous aortic valve replacement: predictors and clinical significance.

Authors:  Rebecca T Hahn; Susheel Kodali; Philippe Généreux; Martin Leon
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Impact of aortic valve calcification severity on device success after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Jeremy Larroche; Loïc Panh; Thibault Lhermusier; Vincent Bataille; Marie-Agnès Marachet; Thomas Chollet; Antoine Petermann; Frederic Bouisset; Nicolas Boudou; Bertrand Marcheix; Hervé Rousseau; Michel Galinier; Didier Carrié; Olivier Lairez; Yoan Lavie-Badie
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Predictors of paravalvular regurgitation and permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVR with a next-generation self-expanding device.

Authors:  Victor Mauri; Florian Deuschl; Thomas Frohn; Niklas Schofer; Matthias Linder; Elmar Kuhn; Andreas Schaefer; Volker Rudolph; Navid Madershahian; Lenard Conradi; Tanja K Rudolph; Ulrich Schäfer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Effect of Eccentric Calcification of an Aortic Valve on the Implant Depth of a Venus-A Prosthesis During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Lanlan Li; Yang Liu; Ping Jin; Jiayou Tang; Linhe Lu; Guangyu Zhu; Chennian Xu; Yanyan Ma; Jian Yang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Imaging of cardiac valves by computed tomography.

Authors:  Gudrun Feuchtner
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2013-12-29

Review 6.  MRI evaluation prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI): When to acquire and how to interpret.

Authors:  Abhishek Chaturvedi; Susan K Hobbs; Fred S Ling; Apeksha Chaturvedi; Peter Knight
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-02-25

Review 7.  Patient selection for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A combined clinical and multimodality imaging approach.

Authors:  Rosangela Cocchia; Antonello D'Andrea; Marianna Conte; Massimo Cavallaro; Lucia Riegler; Rodolfo Citro; Cesare Sirignano; Massimo Imbriaco; Maurizio Cappelli; Giovanni Gregorio; Raffaele Calabrò; Eduardo Bossone
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-26

Review 8.  Biomechanics of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implant.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh; Pierluigi Nappi; Antonio Fiore
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-04

9.  Hemodynamic comparison of transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra versus SAPIEN 3: The HomoSAPIEN registry.

Authors:  Noriaki Moriyama; Heidi Lehtola; Hirokazu Miyashita; Jarkko Piuhola; Matti Niemelä; Mika Laine
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Impact of device landing zone calcification patterns on paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with different next-generation devices.

Authors:  Victor Mauri; Thomas Frohn; Florian Deuschl; Kawa Mohemed; Kathrin Kuhr; Andreas Reimann; Maria Isabel Körber; Niklas Schofer; Matti Adam; Kai Friedrichs; Elmar W Kuhn; Smita Scholtz; Volker Rudolph; Thorsten C W Wahlers; Stephan Baldus; Navid Mader; Ulrich Schäfer; Tanja K Rudolph
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.