CONTEXT: Researchers studying work-life balance have examined policy development and implementation to create a family-friendly work environment from an individualistic perspective rather than from a cohort of employees working under the same supervisor. OBJECTIVE: To investigate what factors influence work-life balance within the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I clinical setting from the perspective of an athletic training staff. DESIGN: Qualitative study. SETTING: Web-based management system. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Eight athletic trainers (5 men, 3 women; age = 38 ± 7 years) in the NCAA Division I setting. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Participants responded to a series of questions by journaling their thoughts and experiences. We included data-source triangulation, multiple-analyst triangulation, and peer review to establish data credibility. We analyzed the data via a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the data. Family-oriented and supportive work environment was described as a workplace that fosters and encourages work-life balance through professionally and personally shared goals. Nonwork outlets included activities, such as exercise and personal hobbies, that provide time away from the role of the athletic trainer. Individualistic strategies reflected that although the athletic training staff must work together and support one another, each staff member must have his or her own personal strategies to manage personal and professional responsibilities. CONCLUSIONS: The foundation for a successful work environment in the NCAA Division I clinical setting potentially can center on the management style of the supervisor, especially one who promotes teamwork among his or her staff members. Although a family-friendly work environment is necessary for work-life balance, each member of the athletic training staff must have personal strategies in place to fully achieve a balance.
CONTEXT: Researchers studying work-life balance have examined policy development and implementation to create a family-friendly work environment from an individualistic perspective rather than from a cohort of employees working under the same supervisor. OBJECTIVE: To investigate what factors influence work-life balance within the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I clinical setting from the perspective of an athletic training staff. DESIGN: Qualitative study. SETTING: Web-based management system. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Eight athletic trainers (5 men, 3 women; age = 38 ± 7 years) in the NCAA Division I setting. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Participants responded to a series of questions by journaling their thoughts and experiences. We included data-source triangulation, multiple-analyst triangulation, and peer review to establish data credibility. We analyzed the data via a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the data. Family-oriented and supportive work environment was described as a workplace that fosters and encourages work-life balance through professionally and personally shared goals. Nonwork outlets included activities, such as exercise and personal hobbies, that provide time away from the role of the athletic trainer. Individualistic strategies reflected that although the athletic training staff must work together and support one another, each staff member must have his or her own personal strategies to manage personal and professional responsibilities. CONCLUSIONS: The foundation for a successful work environment in the NCAA Division I clinical setting potentially can center on the management style of the supervisor, especially one who promotes teamwork among his or her staff members. Although a family-friendly work environment is necessary for work-life balance, each member of the athletic training staff must have personal strategies in place to fully achieve a balance.
Authors: Stephanie M Mazerolle; Kerri E Gavin; William A Pitney; Douglas J Casa; Laura Burton Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2012 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Christine M Baugh; Zachary Y Kerr; Emily Kroshus; Bailey L Lanser; Tory R Lindley; William P Meehan Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2020-06-23 Impact factor: 2.860