Literature DB >> 2406602

Effects of electronic fetal-heart-rate monitoring, as compared with periodic auscultation, on the neurologic development of premature infants.

K K Shy1, D A Luthy, F C Bennett, M Whitfield, E B Larson, G van Belle, J P Hughes, J A Wilson, M A Stenchever.   

Abstract

In a multicenter, randomized clinical trial, we assessed the early neurologic development of 93 children born prematurely whose heart rates were monitored electronically during delivery and compared it with that of 96 children born prematurely whose heart rates were periodically monitored by auscultation. All the children were singletons with cephalic presentation, and all weighed less than or equal to 1750 g at birth. The mental and psychomotor indexes of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (standardized mean score +/- SD, 100 +/- 16) and a formal neurologic examination were administered at three follow-up visits (at 4, 8, and 18 months of age, corrected for gestational age). At 18 months, the mean mental-development scores in the groups receiving electronic fetal monitoring and periodic auscultation were 100.5 +/- 2.4 and 104.9 +/- 1.8, respectively (P greater than 0.1). The mean psychomotor-development scores in the two groups at 18 months were 94.0 +/- 2.4 and 98.3 +/- 1.8, respectively (P greater than 0.1). The incidence of cerebral palsy was higher in the electronically monitored group--20 percent as compared with 8 percent in the group that was monitored by auscultation (P less than 0.03). In the electronic-fetal-monitoring group (but not in the periodic-auscultation group), the risk of cerebral palsy increased with the duration of abnormal fetal-heart-rate patterns, as assessed by retrospective review (chi 2 trend = 12.71, P less than 0.001). The median time to delivery after the diagnosis of abnormal fetal-heart-rate patterns was 104 minutes with electronic fetal monitoring, as compared with 60 minutes with periodic auscultation. We conclude that as compared with a structured program of periodic auscultation, electronic fetal monitoring does not result in improved neurologic development in children born prematurely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2406602     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199003013220904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  15 in total

1.  Assessment of mother and fetus in labour. Article is not evidence based.

Authors:  O Olsen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-07

2.  Novel monoclonal antiendotoxin antibody therapy: efficacy at any price?

Authors:  W K Fant
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Fetal monitoring and neonatal resuscitation: what the anaesthetist should know.

Authors:  J Guay
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  The cesarean birth rate: influence of hospital teaching status.

Authors:  D M Oleske; G L Glandon; G J Giacomelli; S F Hohmann
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Defining reducible risk : Social dimensions of assessing birth technologies.

Authors:  S B Ruzek
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1993-12

Review 6.  Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Declan Devane; Gillian Ml Gyte; Anna Cuthbert
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-03

7.  A prospective cohort study of fetal heart rate monitoring: deceleration area is predictive of fetal acidemia.

Authors:  Alison G Cahill; Methodius G Tuuli; Molly J Stout; Julia D López; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Electronic fetal monitoring, cerebral palsy, and caesarean section: assumptions versus evidence.

Authors:  Karin B Nelson; Thomas P Sartwelle; Dwight J Rouse
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-12-01

9.  S1-Guideline on the Use of CTG During Pregnancy and Labor: Long version - AWMF Registry No. 015/036.

Authors: 
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.915

10.  Electronic fetal monitoring: a Canadian survey.

Authors:  B L Davies; P A Niday; C A Nimrod; E R Drake; A E Sprague; M J Trépanier
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.