Literature DB >> 24062317

Multisensory self-motion compensation during object trajectory judgments.

Kalpana Dokka1, Paul R MacNeilage2, Gregory C DeAngelis3, Dora E Angelaki1.   

Abstract

Judging object trajectory during self-motion is a fundamental ability for mobile organisms interacting with their environment. This fundamental ability requires the nervous system to compensate for the visual consequences of self-motion in order to make accurate judgments, but the mechanisms of this compensation are poorly understood. We comprehensively examined both the accuracy and precision of observers' ability to judge object trajectory in the world when self-motion was defined by vestibular, visual, or combined visual-vestibular cues. Without decision feedback, subjects demonstrated no compensation for self-motion that was defined solely by vestibular cues, partial compensation (47%) for visually defined self-motion, and significantly greater compensation (58%) during combined visual-vestibular self-motion. With decision feedback, subjects learned to accurately judge object trajectory in the world, and this generalized to novel self-motion speeds. Across conditions, greater compensation for self-motion was associated with decreased precision of object trajectory judgments, indicating that self-motion compensation comes at the cost of reduced discriminability. Our findings suggest that the brain can flexibly represent object trajectory relative to either the observer or the world, but a world-centered representation comes at the cost of decreased precision due to the inclusion of noisy self-motion signals.
© The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  flow parsing; object motion; optic flow; self-motion; vestibular

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24062317      PMCID: PMC4318529          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  52 in total

1.  Smooth eye movements and spatial localisation.

Authors:  E Brenner; J B Smeets; A V van den Berg
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Smooth anticipatory eye movements alter the memorized position of flashed targets.

Authors:  Gunnar Blohm; Marcus Missal; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  A model that integrates eye velocity commands to keep track of smooth eye displacements.

Authors:  Gunnar Blohm; Lance M Optican; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Visual and nonvisual contributions to three-dimensional heading selectivity in the medial superior temporal area.

Authors:  Yong Gu; Paul V Watkins; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A theory of phenomenal geometry and its applications.

Authors:  W C Gogel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-08

6.  The role of suggested size in distance responses.

Authors:  W C Gogel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-08

7.  Analysis of the perception of motion concomitant with a lateral motion of the head.

Authors:  W C Gogel
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-09

8.  Estimating heading during real and simulated eye movements.

Authors:  M S Banks; S M Ehrlich; B T Backus; J A Crowell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Estimating distance during self-motion: a role for visual-vestibular interactions.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Paul R MacNeilage; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Multi-sensory weights depend on contextual noise in reference frame transformations.

Authors:  Jessica Katherine Burns; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  18 in total

1.  Causal inference accounts for heading perception in the presence of object motion.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Hyeshin Park; Michael Jansen; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A Neural Model of MST and MT Explains Perceived Object Motion during Self-Motion.

Authors:  Oliver W Layton; Brett R Fajen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A simple approach to ignoring irrelevant variables by population decoding based on multisensory neurons.

Authors:  HyungGoo R Kim; Xaq Pitkow; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Dissociation of Self-Motion and Object Motion by Linear Population Decoding That Approximates Marginalization.

Authors:  Ryo Sasaki; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Perception of object motion during self-motion: Correlated biases in judgments of heading direction and object motion.

Authors:  Xing Xing; Jeffrey A Saunders
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.004

6.  A neural mechanism for detecting object motion during self-motion.

Authors:  HyungGoo R Kim; Dora E Angelaki; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 7.  Resolving the active versus passive conundrum for head direction cells.

Authors:  M E Shinder; J S Taube
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Multisensory Integration of Visual and Vestibular Signals Improves Heading Discrimination in the Presence of a Moving Object.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Eye Movements in Darkness Modulate Self-Motion Perception.

Authors:  Ivar Adrianus H Clemens; Luc P J Selen; Antonella Pomante; Paul R MacNeilage; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-01-25

10.  Accuracy and Tuning of Flow Parsing for Visual Perception of Object Motion During Self-Motion.

Authors:  Diederick C Niehorster; Li Li
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.