Literature DB >> 22045777

Estimating distance during self-motion: a role for visual-vestibular interactions.

Kalpana Dokka1, Paul R MacNeilage, Gregory C DeAngelis, Dora E Angelaki.   

Abstract

A fundamental challenge for the visual system is to extract the 3D spatial structure of the environment. When an observer translates without moving the eyes, the retinal speed of a stationary object is related to its distance by a scale factor that depends on the velocity of the observer's self-motion. Here, we aim to test whether the brain uses vestibular cues to self-motion to estimate distance to stationary surfaces in the environment. This relationship was systematically probed using a two-alternative forced-choice task in which distance perceived from monocular image motion during passive body translation was compared to distance perceived from binocular disparity while subjects were stationary. We show that perceived distance from motion depended on both observer velocity and retinal speed. For a given head speed, slower retinal speeds led to the perception of farther distances. Likewise, for a given retinal speed, slower head speeds led to the perception of nearer distances. However, these relationships were weak in some subjects and absent in others, and distance estimated from self-motion and retinal image motion was substantially compressed relative to distance estimated from binocular disparity. Overall, our findings suggest that the combination of retinal image motion and vestibular signals related to head velocity can provide a rudimentary capacity for distance estimation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22045777      PMCID: PMC3702038          DOI: 10.1167/11.13.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  47 in total

1.  Estimator reliability and distance scaling in stereoscopic slant perception.

Authors:  B T Backus; M S Banks
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Heading representation in MST: sensory interactions and population encoding.

Authors:  William K Page; Charles J Duffy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Absolute distance perception during in-depth head movement: calibrating optic flow with extra-retinal information.

Authors:  Chin-Hwee Peh; Francesco Panerai; Jacques Droulez; Valérie Cornilleau-Pérès; Loong-Fah Cheong
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Eye movements provide the extra-retinal signal required for the perception of depth from motion parallax.

Authors:  Mark Nawrot
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Depth from motion parallax scales with eye movement gain.

Authors:  Mark Nawrot
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Coding of horizontal disparity and velocity by MT neurons in the alert macaque.

Authors:  Gregory C DeAngelis; Takanori Uka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Contribution of extraretinal signals to the scaling of object distance during self-motion.

Authors:  F Panerai; V Cornilleau-Pérès; J Droulez
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-07

8.  Motion parallax and absolute distance.

Authors:  S H Ferris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1972-10

9.  Accuracy of absolute visual distance and size estimation in space as a function of stereopsis and motion parallax.

Authors:  J W Dees
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-09

10.  A statistical explanation of visual space.

Authors:  Zhiyong Yang; Dale Purves
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  7 in total

1.  Perceptual scaling of visual and inertial cues: effects of field of view, image size, depth cues, and degree of freedom.

Authors:  B J Correia Grácio; J E Bos; M M van Paassen; M Mulder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Multisensory self-motion compensation during object trajectory judgments.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Paul R MacNeilage; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Psychophysical evidence for auditory motion parallax.

Authors:  Daria Genzel; Michael Schutte; W Owen Brimijoin; Paul R MacNeilage; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Bayesian comparison of explicit and implicit causal inference strategies in multisensory heading perception.

Authors:  Luigi Acerbi; Kalpana Dokka; Dora E Angelaki; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Systematic biases in human heading estimation.

Authors:  Luigi F Cuturi; Paul R MacNeilage
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Unilateral vestibular loss impairs external space representation.

Authors:  Liliane Borel; Christine Redon-Zouiteni; Pierre Cauvin; Michel Dumitrescu; Arnaud Devèze; Jacques Magnan; Patrick Péruch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Active vision in immersive, 360° real-world environments.

Authors:  Amanda J Haskins; Jeff Mentch; Thomas L Botch; Caroline E Robertson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.