Literature DB >> 24061923

Principal component analysis: a method for determining the essential dynamics of proteins.

Charles C David1, Donald J Jacobs.   

Abstract

It has become commonplace to employ principal component analysis to reveal the most important motions in proteins. This method is more commonly known by its acronym, PCA. While most popular molecular dynamics packages inevitably provide PCA tools to analyze protein trajectories, researchers often make inferences of their results without having insight into how to make interpretations, and they are often unaware of limitations and generalizations of such analysis. Here we review best practices for applying standard PCA, describe useful variants, discuss why one may wish to make comparison studies, and describe a set of metrics that make comparisons possible. In practice, one will be forced to make inferences about the essential dynamics of a protein without having the desired amount of samples. Therefore, considerable time is spent on describing how to judge the significance of results, highlighting pitfalls. The topic of PCA is reviewed from the perspective of many practpan class="Chemical">ical considerations, and useful recipes are provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24061923      PMCID: PMC4676806          DOI: 10.1007/978-1-62703-658-0_11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  28 in total

1.  Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model.

Authors:  A R Atilgan; S R Durell; R L Jernigan; M C Demirel; O Keskin; I Bahar
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Conformational change of proteins arising from normal mode calculations.

Authors:  F Tama; Y H Sanejouand
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  2001-01

3.  On the convergence of the conformational coordinates basis set obtained by the essential dynamics analysis of proteins' molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  A Amadei; M A Ceruso; A Di Nola
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-09-01

Review 4.  Collective protein dynamics in relation to function.

Authors:  H J Berendsen; S Hayward
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.809

5.  Large Amplitude Elastic Motions in Proteins from a Single-Parameter, Atomic Analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1996-08-26       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications.

Authors:  A Hyvärinen; E Oja
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2000 May-Jun

7.  Convergence of sampling in protein simulations.

Authors:  Berk Hess
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2002-03-01

8.  Protein flexibility predictions using graph theory.

Authors:  D J Jacobs; A J Rader; L A Kuhn; M F Thorpe
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-08-01

Review 9.  Investigating protein dynamics in collective coordinate space.

Authors:  A Kitao; N Go
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.809

10.  Normal mode analysis of macromolecular motions in a database framework: developing mode concentration as a useful classifying statistic.

Authors:  W G Krebs; Vadim Alexandrov; Cyrus A Wilson; Nathaniel Echols; Haiyuan Yu; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-09-01
View more
  159 in total

1.  Cooperativity and allostery in aquaporin 0 regulation by Ca2.

Authors:  J Alfredo Freites; Karin L Németh-Cahalan; James E Hall; Douglas J Tobias
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.747

2.  Structural and binding insights into HIV-1 protease and P2-ligand interactions through molecular dynamics simulations, binding free energy and principal component analysis.

Authors:  Konda Reddy Karnati; Yixuan Wang
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.518

3.  Activated nanoscale actin-binding domain motion in the catenin-cadherin complex revealed by neutron spin echo spectroscopy.

Authors:  Bela Farago; Iain D Nicholl; Shen Wang; Xiaolin Cheng; David J E Callaway; Zimei Bu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  3D quantitative comparative analysis of long bone diaphysis variations in microanatomy and cross-sectional geometry.

Authors:  Alexandra Houssaye; Maxime Taverne; Raphaël Cornette
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Molecular dynamics characterization of the SAMHD1 Aicardi-Goutières Arg145Gln mutant: structural determinants for the impaired tetramerization.

Authors:  Francesca Cardamone; Mattia Falconi; Alessandro Desideri
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  In silico assessment of new progesterone receptor inhibitors using molecular dynamics: a new insight into breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Vahid Zarezade; Marzie Abolghasemi; Fakher Rahim; Ali Veisi; Mohammad Behbahani
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  A molecular dynamics simulation study decodes the early stage of the disassembly process abolishing the human SAMHD1 function.

Authors:  Francesca Cardamone; Federico Iacovelli; Giovanni Chillemi; Mattia Falconi; Alessandro Desideri
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Molecular determinants of Ebola nucleocapsid stability from molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Chaoyi Xu; Nidhi Katyal; Tanya Nesterova; Juan R Perilla
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  The solution structure of the complement deregulator FHR5 reveals a compact dimer and provides new insights into CFHR5 nephropathy.

Authors:  Nilufar Kadkhodayi-Kholghi; Jayesh S Bhatt; Jayesh Gor; Lindsay C McDermott; Daniel P Gale; Stephen J Perkins
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Early Events in the Amyloid Formation of the A546T Mutant of Transforming Growth Factor β-Induced Protein in Corneal Dystrophies Compared to the Nonfibrillating R555W and R555Q Mutants.

Authors:  Heidi Koldsø; Ole Juul Andersen; Camilla Lund Nikolajsen; Carsten Scavenius; Charlotte S Sørensen; Jarl Underhaug; Kasper Runager; Niels Chr Nielsen; Jan J Enghild; Birgit Schiøtt
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.