Literature DB >> 29411354

3D quantitative comparative analysis of long bone diaphysis variations in microanatomy and cross-sectional geometry.

Alexandra Houssaye1, Maxime Taverne1, Raphaël Cornette2.   

Abstract

Long bone inner structure and cross-sectional geometry display a strong functional signal, leading to convergences, and are widely analyzed in comparative anatomy at small and large taxonomic scales. Long bone microanatomical studies have essentially been conducted on transverse sections but also on a few longitudinal ones. Recent studies highlighted the interest in analyzing variations of the inner structure along the diaphysis using a qualitative as well as a quantitative approach. With the development of microtomography, it has become possible to study three-dimensional (3D) bone microanatomy and, in more detail, the form-function relationships of these features. This study focused on the selection of quantitative parameters to describe in detail the cross-sectional shape changes and distribution of the osseous tissue along the diaphysis. Two-dimensional (2D) virtual transverse sections were also performed in the two usual reference planes and results were compared with those obtained based on the whole diaphysis analysis. The sample consisted in 14 humeri and 14 femora of various mammalian taxa that are essentially terrestrial. Comparative quantitative analyses between different datasets made it possible to highlight the parameters that are strongly impacted by size and phylogeny and the redundant ones, and thus to estimate their relevance for use in form-function analyses. The analysis illustrated that results based on 2D transverse sections are similar for both sectional planes; thus if a strong bias exists when mixing sections from the two reference planes in the same analysis, it would not problematic to use either one plane or the other in comparative studies. However, this may no longer hold for taxa showing a much stronger variation in bone microstructure along the diaphysis. Finally, the analysis demonstrated the significant contribution of the parameters describing variations along the diaphysis, and thus the interest in performing 3D analyses; this should be even more fruitful for heterogeneous diaphyses. In addition, covariation analyses showed that there is a strong interest in removing the size effect to access the differences in the microstructure of the humerus and femur. This methodological study provides a reference for future quantitative analyses on long bone inner structure and should make it possible, through a detailed knowledge of each descriptive parameter, to better interpret results from the multivariate analyses associated with these studies. This will have direct implications for studies in vertebrate anatomy, but also in paleontology and anthropology.
© 2018 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D bone microanatomy; diaphysis; long bone; quantitative parameters

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29411354      PMCID: PMC5879956          DOI: 10.1111/joa.12783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  32 in total

Review 1.  How well are bones designed to resist fracture?

Authors:  John D Currey
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  Pattern and process in constructional morphology.

Authors:  Jorge Cubo
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 3.  The ImageJ ecosystem: An open platform for biomedical image analysis.

Authors:  Johannes Schindelin; Curtis T Rueden; Mark C Hiner; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 2.609

4.  Structure and composition of the Trinil femora: functional and taxonomic implications.

Authors:  Christopher B Ruff; Laurent Puymerail; Roberto Macchiarelli; Justin Sipla; Russell L Ciochon
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.895

5.  Adaptive Patterns in Aquatic Amniote Bone Microanatomy-More Complex than Previously Thought.

Authors:  Alexandra Houssaye; P Martin Sander; Nicole Klein
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 3.326

Review 6.  Phylogenetic signal in primate behaviour, ecology and life history.

Authors:  Jason M Kamilar; Natalie Cooper
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Long bone histology of sauropterygia from the lower Muschelkalk of the Germanic basin provides unexpected implications for phylogeny.

Authors:  Nicole Klein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Long bone articular and diaphyseal structure in old world monkeys and apes. I: locomotor effects.

Authors:  Christopher B Ruff
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.868

9.  Body Size Predicts Echolocation Call Peak Frequency Better than Gape Height in Vespertilionid Bats.

Authors:  Jeneni Thiagavel; Sharlene E Santana; John M Ratcliffe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Evolution of bone compactness in extant and extinct moles (Talpidae): exploring humeral microstructure in small fossorial mammals.

Authors:  Patricia S Meier; Constanze Bickelmann; Torsten M Scheyer; Daisuke Koyabu; Marcelo R Sánchez-Villagra
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  3 in total

1.  Functional Morphology and Morphological Diversification of Hind Limb Cross-Sectional Traits in Mustelid Mammals.

Authors:  P Parsi-Pour; B M Kilbourne
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2020-01-08

2.  What about limb long bone nutrient canal(s)? - a 3D investigation in mammals.

Authors:  Alexandra Houssaye; Jocerand Prévoteau
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Morphological diversification of biomechanical traits: mustelid locomotor specializations and the macroevolution of long bone cross-sectional morphology.

Authors:  Brandon M Kilbourne; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.260

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.