Literature DB >> 24057602

Bt rice expressing Cry2Aa does not cause direct detrimental effects on larvae of Chrysoperla sinica.

Yunhe Li1, Yuanyuan Wang, Jörg Romeis, Qingsong Liu, Kejian Lin, Xiuping Chen, Yufa Peng.   

Abstract

To assess the potential effects of Cry2Aa-expressing insect-resistant Bt rice on Chrysoperla sinica larvae, we conducted two tritrophic bioassays using a non-target (Laodelphax striatellus) and a target herbivore (Chilo suppressalis) as prey. None of the tested life-table parameters of C. sinica did differ when fed with L. striatellus nymphs reared on either Bt or control rice plants. Similarly, C. sinica larval survival and development were not affected when fed C. suppressalis larvae that were reared on Cry2Aa-contained artificial diet compared to those fed control diet. However, the 7-day larval weight was significantly decreased in the Bt treatment and none of the C. sinica larvae developed to the adult stage. To clarify whether the observed effects were due to the direct toxicity of Cry2Aa or prey-quality mediated, we conducted a dietary exposure assay in which the toxicity of Cry2Aa to C. sinica larvae was tested. Potassium arsenate (PA) was included as a positive control. None of the tested life-table parameters of C. sinica was adversely affected when fed Cry2Aa at 500 μg/ml sucrose solution. In contrast, C. sinica larvae were adversely affected by feeding on sucrose solution containing PA. In the feeding assays, exposure of C. sinica larvae to Cry2Aa was confirmed by ELISA. Our results demonstrate that C. sinica larvae are not sensitive to Cry2Aa at concentrations exceeding the levels that the larvae may encounter in Bt rice fields. Consequently the detrimental effects observed in the tritrophic studies using Bt rice-fed C. suppressalis as prey can be attributed to the decreased prey quality due to the sensitivity of C. suppressalis larvae to Cry2Aa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24057602     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-013-1127-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  25 in total

Review 1.  General principles for risk assessment of living modified organisms: lessons from chemical risk assessment.

Authors:  Ryan A Hill; Cyrie Sendashonga
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun

2.  Assessment of risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops to nontarget arthropods.

Authors:  Jörg Romeis; Detlef Bartsch; Franz Bigler; Marco P Candolfi; Marco M C Gielkens; Susan E Hartley; Richard L Hellmich; Joseph E Huesing; Paul C Jepson; Raymond Layton; Hector Quemada; Alan Raybould; Robyn I Rose; Joachim Schiemann; Mark K Sears; Anthony M Shelton; Jeremy Sweet; Zigfridas Vaituzis; Jeffrey D Wolt
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Setting the record straight: a rebuttal to an erroneous analysis on transgenic insecticidal crops and natural enemies.

Authors:  Anthony M Shelton; Steven E Naranjo; Jörg Romeis; Richard L Hellmich; Jeffrey D Wolt; Brian A Federici; Ramon Albajes; Franz Bigler; Elisabeth P J Burgess; Galen P Dively; Angharad M R Gatehouse; Louise A Malone; Richard Roush; Mark Sears; Frantisek Sehnal
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Global impact of biotech crops: environmental effects 1996-2009.

Authors:  Graham Brookes; Peter Barfoot
Journal:  GM Crops       Date:  2011 Jan-Mar

Review 5.  Deriving criteria to select arthropod species for laboratory tests to assess the ecological risks from cultivating arthropod-resistant genetically engineered crops.

Authors:  Jörg Romeis; Alan Raybould; Franz Bigler; Marco P Candolfi; Richard L Hellmich; Joseph E Huesing; Anthony M Shelton
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 7.086

6.  Development of an early-tier laboratory bioassay for assessing the impact of orally-active insecticidal compounds on larvae of Coccinella septempunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae).

Authors:  Fernando Alvarez-Alfageme; Zoltan Pálinkás; Franz Bigler; Jörg Romeis
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.377

7.  Insect resistant rice generated by introduction of a modified delta-endotoxin gene of Bacillus thuringiensis.

Authors:  H Fujimoto; K Itoh; M Yamamoto; J Kyozuka; K Shimamoto
Journal:  Biotechnology (N Y)       Date:  1993-10

8.  Bacillus thuringiensis toxin (Cry1Ab) has no direct effect on larvae of the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae).

Authors:  Jörg Romeis; Anna Dutton; Franz Bigler
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2004 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 2.354

9.  A comprehensive assessment of the effects of Bt cotton on Coleomegilla maculata demonstrates no detrimental effects by Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab.

Authors:  Yunhe Li; Jörg Romeis; Ping Wang; Yufa Peng; Anthony M Shelton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Consumption of Bt maize pollen expressing Cry1Ab or Cry3Bb1 does not harm adult green Lacewings, Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae).

Authors:  Yunhe Li; Michael Meissle; Jörg Romeis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  Bt rice does not disrupt the host-searching behavior of the parasitoid Cotesia chilonis.

Authors:  Qingsong Liu; Jörg Romeis; Huilin Yu; Yongjun Zhang; Yunhe Li; Yufa Peng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Consumption of Bt rice pollen containing Cry1C or Cry2A does not pose a risk to Propylea japonica (Thunberg) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae).

Authors:  Yunhe Li; Xiaojie Zhang; Xiuping Chen; Jörg Romeis; Xinming Yin; Yufa Peng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Bt rice expressing Cry2Aa does not harm Cyrtorhinus lividipennis, a main predator of the nontarget herbivore Nilapavarta lugens.

Authors:  Yu Han; Jiarong Meng; Jie Chen; Wanlun Cai; Yu Wang; Jing Zhao; Yueping He; Yanni Feng; Hongxia Hua
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Assessing the effects of Cry1C rice and Cry2A rice to Pseudogonatopus flavifemur, a parasitoid of rice planthoppers.

Authors:  Jun-Ce Tian; Jörg Romeis; Kai Liu; Fa-Cheng Zhang; Xu-Song Zheng; Hong-Xing Xu; Gui-Hua Chen; Xiao-Chan He; Zhong-Xian Lu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Transcriptomic response of wolf spider, Pardosa pseudoannulata, to transgenic rice expressing Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab protein.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Yuande Peng; Kaifu Xiao; Baoyang Wei; Jilin Hu; Zhi Wang; Qisheng Song; Xuguo Zhou
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.563

6.  Transgenic Cry1Ac cotton does not affect the development and fecundity of Chrysoperla carnea.

Authors:  Ruifeng Ding; Deying Ma; Ahtam Uwais; Dongmei Wang; Jian Liu; Yao Xu; Haobin Li; Haiqiang Li; Hongsheng Pan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Bacillus thuringiensis Maize Expressing a Fusion Gene Cry1Ab/Cry1AcZM Does Not Harm Valued Pollen Feeders.

Authors:  Xiaowei Xie; Zhifu Cui; Yanan Wang; Yuanyuan Wang; Fengqin Cao; Jörg Romeis; Yufa Peng; Yunhe Li
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 4.546

8.  Consumption of Bt rice pollen containing Cry1C or Cry2A protein poses a low to negligible risk to the silkworm Bombyx mori (Lepidoptera: Bombyxidae).

Authors:  Yan Yang; Yue Liu; Fengqin Cao; Xiuping Chen; Lisheng Cheng; Jörg Romeis; Yunhe Li; Yufa Peng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The end of a myth-Bt (Cry1Ab) maize does not harm green lacewings.

Authors:  Jörg Romeis; Michael Meissle; Steven E Naranjo; Yunhe Li; Franz Bigler
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Toxicological and biochemical analyses demonstrate no toxic effect of Cry1C and Cry2A to Folsomia candida.

Authors:  Yan Yang; Xiuping Chen; Lisheng Cheng; Fengqin Cao; Jörg Romeis; Yunhe Li; Yufa Peng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.