Literature DB >> 15612274

General principles for risk assessment of living modified organisms: lessons from chemical risk assessment.

Ryan A Hill1, Cyrie Sendashonga.   

Abstract

Modern biotechnology has led to the development and use of Living Modified Organisms (LMOs) for agriculture and other purposes. Regulators at the national level are increasingly depending on risk assessment as a tool for assessing potential adverse effects of LMOs on the environment and human health. In addition, the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, an international agreement expected to enter into force in the near future, requires risk assessment as the basis for decision-making regarding import of some LMOs. While LMO risk assessment is relatively new, there are other risk assessment disciplines which have developed over longer time periods. The field of assessment of the environmental and human health risks of chemicals is particularly well developed, and is similar in application to LMO risk assessment. This paper aims to draw lessons for LMO risk assessment from the vast experience with chemical risk assessment. Seven general principles are outlined which should serve as a useful checklist to guide assessments of risks posed by LMOs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15612274     DOI: 10.1051/ebr:2003004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res        ISSN: 1635-7922


  13 in total

1.  A semi-quantitative approach to GMO risk-benefit analysis.

Authors:  E Jane Morris
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Planning environmental risk assessment for genetically modified crops: problem formulation for stress-tolerant crops.

Authors:  Thomas E Nickson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Towards a more open debate about values in decision-making on agricultural biotechnology.

Authors:  Yann Devos; Olivier Sanvido; Joyce Tait; Alan Raybould
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Using problem formulation to clarify the meaning of weight of evidence and biological relevance in environmental risk assessments for genetically modified crops.

Authors:  Alan Raybould; Karen Holt; Ian Kimber
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.074

5.  Problem formulation and phenotypic characterisation for the development of novel crops.

Authors:  Alan Raybould
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  Plant characterization of Roundup Ready 2 Yield ® soybean, MON 89788, for use in ecological risk assessment.

Authors:  Michael J Horak; Eric W Rosenbaum; Daniel L Kendrick; Bernard Sammons; Samuel L Phillips; Thomas E Nickson; Raymond C Dobert; Tim Perez
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.788

7.  Bt rice expressing Cry2Aa does not cause direct detrimental effects on larvae of Chrysoperla sinica.

Authors:  Yunhe Li; Yuanyuan Wang; Jörg Romeis; Qingsong Liu; Kejian Lin; Xiuping Chen; Yufa Peng
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Advancing environmental risk assessment for transgenic biofeedstock crops.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wolt
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 6.040

9.  Transgene x environment interactions in genetically modified wheat.

Authors:  Simon L Zeller; Olena Kalinina; Susanne Brunner; Beat Keller; Bernhard Schmid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Recommendations for the design of laboratory studies on non-target arthropods for risk assessment of genetically engineered plants.

Authors:  Jörg Romeis; Richard L Hellmich; Marco P Candolfi; Keri Carstens; Adinda De Schrijver; Angharad M R Gatehouse; Rod A Herman; Joseph E Huesing; Morven A McLean; Alan Raybould; Anthony M Shelton; Annabel Waggoner
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.788

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.